The Apple iPad

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vidboy10
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 13,959
  • Replies Replies 130
I read about this earlier today and I thought it was a joke at first. I don't know what to say... O_o

I'll just stick to my iPhone 3GS for now.
smile.gif
 
I knew it. This looks interesting especially at this pricepoint.

On the other hand, why the hell didn't he have Mac OS X or something similar to that run on it? It's like an iPhone on a big screen.
 
I would love this technology but I will have to wait for a cheaper alternatives when Asus will make one of this baby. This is the start same with iPhone.

When the iPhone was released, many phone company released their own touchscreen phones. Before, touchscreen phones are crap but now they're amazing thanks to iPhone
 
Urza said:
Seraph said:
Urza said:
Seraph said:
And? First one: that's my opinion for me. Second: I commented on what my tablet has, never did I say the iPad's was going to be worse. Third: I never said what that 1GHz processor meant for me or anyone else, just that it was only 1GHz.
lecture.gif

Whether or not you actually said it doesn't change the fact that it was clearly implied.
lecture.gif


That's true, but that only applies to the processor statement. The implication would then be my opinion, which in my opinion that processor most likely isn't what I want.
Fair enough.


QUOTE
The chip was made by ARM. The same company that makes the iPhone/HTC/Nintendo DS processors. "Apple designed" could mean anything. Most likely, I think it is a variation on another chip that ARM produces with some tweaks that apple wanted. Thus making it Apple designed.
"ARM" is the name of the architecture, which other companies can license from the company who owns the rights to make their own chips based off of.

Where did you see ARM mentioned?

http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/01/27/...-month-standby/

ARM is not an architecture, as far as I know, they just name their chips after the company. It is a chip manufacture, I personally have stock in this company. The name of the company is ARM Holdings.
 
Urza said:
Dookieman said:
ARM is not an architecture. It is a chip manufacture, I personally have stock in this company. The name of the company is ARM Holdings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture

WikipediaThe ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC) instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by ARM Holdings.

Either way, its named after the company that makes the chip. So we were both right.
 
Dookieman said:
Urza said:
Dookieman said:
ARM is not an architecture. It is a chip manufacture, I personally have stock in this company. The name of the company is ARM Holdings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture

WikipediaThe ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC) instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by ARM Holdings.

Either way, its named after the company that makes the chip. So we were both right.
No.

You said the chip was made by ARM (Holdings), which is incorrect. The architecture was designed by them and possibly parts of it were licensed for the chip in the iPad, but that is not the same thing.

In addition, still haven't seen any evidence showing that the chip indeed is based on the ARM arch.
 
godsakes said:
i don't own any apple products as i'm not into my music nor mobiles gadgets - but i have to say i am interested in the ipad for casual internet browsing & ebook reading around the house (assuming it's well implemented). if it came with a stand it would be useful as a picture frame for displaying my photos (i do have one of those picture frames but the image quality is naff)

the music/video playback would be side bonuses

like this?
accessories_20100127.jpg


Also, I'd want it... but I wouldn't pay that much for it.... I think I wouldn't use it that much, not enough to pay that amount of money at least.

If I was rich though, I'd love this!!
 
FLAME WAR!!!!!!! That's the only reason I came, to watch those hilarious fireworks!
biggrin.gif


Looks overpriced (expected) and still not what I want. First question that popped into mind when I saw this at lunch at school:

But, can it play Crysis?!?//1/2
 
Urza said:
Dookieman said:
Urza said:
Dookieman said:
ARM is not an architecture. It is a chip manufacture, I personally have stock in this company. The name of the company is ARM Holdings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture

WikipediaThe ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC) instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by ARM Holdings.

Either way, its named after the company that makes the chip. So we were both right.
No.

You said the chip was made by ARM (Holdings), which is incorrect. The architecture was designed by them and possibly parts of it were licensed for the chip in the iPad, but that is not the same thing.

In addition, still haven't seen any evidence showing that the chip indeed is based on the ARM arch.
"Why? It’s largely because one of the most expensive components — the processor — is a custom-made, in-house Apple (AAPL) 1GHz chip called the A4. In April 2008, Apple bought a chip company called PA Semiconductor, which according to Forbes at the time was “known for its design of sophisticated, low-power chips.” Forbes also said this was a “blow for chip-maker Intel,” which had been trying to sell Apple on its low-power Atom chips."

"PA Semi, like most chip-makers, licensed much of its intellectual property (in the form of chip designs) from ARM Holdings, a small British semiconductor design company that provides the building blocks to companies like TI (TXN), Qualcomm (QCOM) and now Apple. In fact, ARM’s general manager of IP, Simon Segars, told me last year that they sell their famously efficient chip designs to “almost every semiconductor company… in one way or another,” many of whom are still paying royalties after licensing fees."

http://industry.bnet.com/technology/100049...y-arm-all-over/

There, evidence that it is ARM technology.
 
Dookieman said:
"Why? It’s largely because one of the most expensive components — the processor — is a custom-made, in-house Apple (AAPL) 1GHz chip called the A4. In April 2008, Apple bought a chip company called PA Semiconductor, which according to Forbes at the time was “known for its design of sophisticated, low-power chips.” Forbes also said this was a “blow for chip-maker Intel,” which had been trying to sell Apple on its low-power Atom chips."

"PA Semi, like most chip-makers, licensed much of its intellectual property (in the form of chip designs) from ARM Holdings, a small British semiconductor design company that provides the building blocks to companies like TI (TXN), Qualcomm (QCOM) and now Apple. In fact, ARM’s general manager of IP, Simon Segars, told me last year that they sell their famously efficient chip designs to “almost every semiconductor company… in one way or another,” many of whom are still paying royalties after licensing fees."

http://industry.bnet.com/technology/100049...y-arm-all-over/

There, evidence that it is ARM technology.
Pretty shaky logic there.

Apple released another ARM device a little of a year after acquiring PA Semiconductor (the 3GS).

In fact, last July they acquired another company, Imagination Technologies, which specialized in producing system-on-a-chips.

You shouldn't blindly believe everything that random bloggers tell you.
 
Stupid idea. Who wants a giant iPod Touch? Unless you've got the money, this is going to be a fail. Lately, the smaller and more high tech a gadget is, the better.

I don't see this doing too well in the market. Then again, they're Apple. Rich people will always be buying their products.
 
shaunj66 said:
A tablet without multi tasking? Are you kidding me?
The ignorant always focused on this aspect of MobileOSX, when it was never really true.

Without going into that though, pretty sure this iPad will support the same background daemons that MobileOSX currently does for AppStore applications (in addition to those built into stock apps like Mail and MusicPlayer).
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum