Team-Xecuter is yet again, expanding their SX Family line-up!

Now adding a FREE app for Android owners to easy launch their SX OS, check out all the official PR details below:

Another day, another update. This time it is a neat little app for Android users.

If you want an easy way to use SX OS and have trouble understanding how to select the payload, then SX Tools is for you. No need to download the SX loader payload and manually select it from the app.

Quick instructions:

1. Install the apk to an OTG capable android phone.
2. Connect the Switch to the phone.
3. On the first use, the app will ask for permission to "use USB device" when the Switch is connected. Check the "Use by default..." and press "OK"
4. SX OS will boot now.

That's it. You don't even need to open the app to use it. Just install it and connect the Switch. Even when the phone is locked, it will work.

--< Team-Xecuter - Rocking the Switch in 2018 and beyond! >--

To download the new SX TOOLS app, please check out the official SX Family portal: --> https://sx.xecuter.com

Source: MaxConsole

 

[ItsKipz]

They didn't, this IS the app. It even says "we" (as in "Team Xecuter") in the README: https://github.com/annson24/SXTools#todo

https://gbatemp.net/threads/nxloade...ader-to-have-sxoss-payload-as-default.509732/

not made by them at all

 

[Brawl345]

https://gbatemp.net/threads/nxloade...ader-to-have-sxoss-payload-as-default.509732/

not made by them at all

Wow... looks like you are right, sorry then!

EDIT: They could've also asked the developer to use the app... we might have to wait for a statement from the dev.

 

[Foxi4]

So why not use nxloader... At least you can see nxloaders source code.

Wouldn't ever run, given TXs shady past with bricking code. My Android is more valuable to me than my switch.

Edit: source seemingly exists, but still don't really see the point.

Its legally required. Welcome to the law, it is pedantic

I'm familiar with the law. The license is right there, in plain sight. It's not hidden in any way. You're absolutely being pedantic and I'm not sure why. With SX OS I could see a big problem - they haven't listed any of their sources. Here they do, but the community is dead-set on hating the team, which is fine, but you can at the very list admit that they're not concealing the origin of their source code. I'm sure they'll add the license to the pre-compiled binary if enough people whine about it, but I doubt that would satisfy the community. You're literally getting hung up on a technicality, as far as I'm concerned they're listing their source.

 

[ItsKipz]

I'm familiar with the law. The license is right there, in plain sight. It's not hidden in any way. You're absolutely being pedantic and I'm not sure why. With SX OS I could see a big problem - they haven't listed any of their sources. Here they do, but the community is dead-set on hating the team, which is fine, but you can at the very list admit that they're not concealing the origin of their source code. I'm sure they'll add the license to the pre-compiled binary if enough people whine about it, but I doubt that would satisfy the community. You're literally getting hung up on a technicality, as far as I'm concerned they're listing their source.

That's just not even true - they stole an open source project and uploaded it on their site with 0 credit or license given.

 

[kumikochan]

I'm familiar with the law. The license is right there, in plain sight. It's not hidden in any way. You're absolutely being pedantic and I'm not sure why. With SX OS I could see a big problem - they haven't listed any of their sources. Here they do, but the community is dead-set on hating the team, which is fine, but you can at the very list admit that they're not concealing the origin of their source code. I'm sure they'll add the license to the pre-compiled binary if enough people whine about it, but I doubt that would satisfy the community. You're literally getting hung up on a technicality, as far as I'm concerned they're listing their source.

Where are they doing that ? Seeing the GitHub is not theirs or in any way related to team xecuter

 

[NeoSlyde]

I'm familiar with the law. The license is right there, in plain sight. It's not hidden in any way. You're absolutely being pedantic and I'm not sure why. With SX OS I could see a big problem - they haven't listed any of their sources. Here they do, but the community is dead-set on hating the team, which is fine, but you can at the very list admit that they're not concealing the origin of their source code. I'm sure they'll add the license to the pre-compiled binary if enough people whine about it, but I doubt that would satisfy the community. You're literally getting hung up on a technicality, as far as I'm concerned they're listing their source.

Couldn’t agree more.

 

[MisterCandy]

Please tell me this is a joke. That can't be real

 

[ItsKipz]

Couldn’t agree more.

Be honest, how much is TX paying you for this?

 

[Draxzelex]

Please tell me this is a joke. That can't be real

It's just as much a joke as the one you did when you made an account just to make that one post.

 

[kumikochan]

Be honest, how much is TX paying you for this?

He's always damage controlling. You never see him until l somebody starts talking shit about xecuter and then he suddenly pops up damage controlling

 

[Foxi4]

That's just not even true - they stole an open source project and uploaded it on their site with 0 credit or license given.

Where are they doing that ? Seeing the GitHub is not theirs or in any way related to team xecuter

I was under the impression that this Github account belongs to one of the Xecuter members, am I incorrect? If that's the case then I retract my comment.

 

[ItsKipz]

He's always damage controlling. You never see him until l somebody starts talking shit about xecuter and then he suddenly pops up damage controlling

Probably the alt of a TX member then, or a really well paid "PR Manager".

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I was under the impression that this Github account belongs to one of the Xecuter members, am I incorrect? If that's the case then I retract my comment.

The SXTools project is a fork of NXLoader made by someone completely unrelated to TX.

 

[kumikochan]

I was under the impression that this Github account belongs to one of the Xecuter members, am I incorrect? If that's the case then I retract my comment.

No it's not one of their members. I thought so 2 at the beginning but it isn't related to them at all seeing that guy released that app almost 2 months ago

 

[Foxi4]

No it's not one of their members. I thought so 2 at the beginning but it isn't related to them at all seeing that guy released that app almost 2 months ago

That's fair. In that case yeah, they obviously stole the app, that's my bad.

 

[MisterCandy]

It's just as much a joke as the one you did when you made an account just to make that one post.

I don't use gbatemp so I just created this account now. Hopefully I remember my password so I can yell at tx for why tf they are doing that if they do something like that again (which they will)

 

[NeoSlyde]

That's fair. In that case yeah, they obviously stole the app, that's my bad.

Why not ask the creator?
Maybe they’ve made an agreement

 

[Ev1l0rd]

I'm familiar with the law. The license is right there, in plain sight. It's not hidden in any way. You're absolutely being pedantic and I'm not sure why. With SX OS I could see a big problem - they haven't listed any of their sources. Here they do, but the community is dead-set on hating the team, which is fine, but you can at the very list admit that they're not concealing the origin of their source code. I'm sure they'll add the license to the pre-compiled binary if enough people whine about it, but I doubt that would satisfy the community. You're literally getting hung up on a technicality, as far as I'm concerned they're listing their source.

Its still required. It's the only thing I'm hung up by at the moment (although my argument about why not use nxloader still stands, especially since in this case they don't even hide it).

They use nxloader, which is under the MIT license, which means they need to put the MIT license of nxloader along with the binaries on their site.

If they add that, I have no direct quarrel, although I do find it personally a little despicable they're putting other people's work as their own, but that's neither here or there for the bigger issue with them, as well as me failing to see the point as it's literally a reskin of an existing tool that does the job more than well.

 

[jakkal]

Wow tx you're ripping off people's shit with no care in this world lolol

All they did was change the damn app icon. This is disgraceful

 

[Foxi4]

Its still required. It's the only thing I'm hung up by at the moment (although my argument about why not use nxloader still stands, especially since in this case they don't even hide it).

They use nxloader, which is under the MIT license, which means they need to put the MIT license of nxloader along with the binaries on their site.

If they add that, I have no direct quarrel, although I do find it personally a little despicable they're putting other people's work as their own, but that's neither here or there for the bigger issue with them, as well as me failing to see the point as it's literally a reskin of an existing tool that does the job more than well.

As it turns out, it's not actually their Github, it's a homebrew fork that was lifted as a pre-compiled APK which I was unaware of at the time, so the whole debacle is irrelevant now.

Why not ask the creator?
Maybe they’ve made an agreement

The onus is on TE to supply the source of their code.

 

[Ev1l0rd]

As it turns out, it's not actually their Github, it's actually a homebrew app that was lifted as a pre-compiled APK which I was unaware of at the time, so the whole debacle is irrelevant now.

Debacle is still relevant, especially now that this has come to light. They need to add the MIT license to their site, if they do that, at least legally they're in the clear.

Of course, morally it's absolutely trash knowing this and it's probably the most outright proof that TX is harmful to the scene.