Spiderman reboot anyone?

Rasas

Banned!
Banned
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Messages
643
Trophies
0
XP
142
Country
United States
Ya, I guess the change in origin ruins it for a lot of people.

Honestly with the way they rewrite things and the death of Gwen's father the captain I don't think it is that good with all things considered. Plus the Lizard's lab in the sewers just doesn't make that much sense to me somewhat. Maybe as said above the origin change ruins it and the information about his Peter's parents was always something I felt the films mentioned to little of but since Conner knew them well enough some information is given and the things given near the start.

Also not killing off the Lizard in the end just seemed strange. I guess I'm use to the a super villain dying at the end of Spider-Man movies. I guess the learning of secret identities so quickly by Gwen and Conners and some other stuff just make it seem like a sequel will be extremely poor.
 

Icealote

My Winter...
Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
609
Trophies
1
Location
Sydney
XP
1,291
Country
Australia
Wait what? So where's MJ in this one and why is there a Gwen Stacy? Is this of those other origins? I'm quite confused.
So I'm guessing this is the one that relates to that Marvel cartoon version that used to be on TV? With those machine web shooters?
Cause if it is, I prefer that. I never liked the Toby McGuire one. His face pissed me off to much and ruined what I liked about Spiderman.
I miss that wise crack remarks Spiderman's known for.
 
S

SixSenseEagle

Guest
1.Gwen stacy was spiderman first love Mj was his second idek how she got into the whole spiderman scene

2. i will miss the orginal spiderman movies 1,2, and 3 toby was good character but he played peter parker to much, watch all the 3 movies, and you see he was supposed to play as spideman not peter parker the whole main role, the only time spiderman came out was when the bad main villains came out there wasn"t really no robbers but only 2, throughout the whole spiderman movie i think.

3.now the amazing spiderman i seen car robbery seen and i like that better just for the fact because he was using cheezy lines and fighting crime like the regular spiderman should be. the trailer is awesome all three of them i can't wait to watch the movie in theater cause i know its gonna be epic and this time there using spiderman for the main role :D .

Ps.heres the car scene
 

BlueStar

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2006
Messages
4,092
Trophies
1
Location
UK
XP
711
Country
I don't understand why they need to reboot this again so soon. Are they really so out of idea that they can't make more than three Siderman films without going "OK, back to the start again"? Or, you know, do the origin of another hero? Or, God for bid, make a movie that's not based on a comic or a book or an old film or a theme park ride?
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
3
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,389
Country
United States
I remember reading that Toby McGuire requested to play Peter Parker again in this reboot.... I lol'd hard.

Toby McGuire did a good job as Spiderman, at least in the first two, the third one was just a clusterfuck of bad ideas. He was able to portray a Spiderman who was torn with regret, vengeance, and duty, which seems more than this bottle-of-hair-gel we've got here.
 

Icealote

My Winter...
Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
609
Trophies
1
Location
Sydney
XP
1,291
Country
Australia
I remember reading that Toby McGuire requested to play Peter Parker again in this reboot.... I lol'd hard.

Toby McGuire did a good job as Spiderman, at least in the first two, the third one was just a clusterfuck of bad ideas. He was able to portray a Spiderman who was torn with regret, vengeance, and duty, which seems more than this bottle-of-hair-gel we've got here.

For me it felt much more he could never grow past the part when Uncle Ben died. He didn't bring Spiderman or Peter Parker to justice in my eyes. I can't say much for the new guy as I'm patiently waiting for the movie to be released to see if he does it any better (or worse for that matter).
 

jalaneme

Female Gamer
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
6,270
Trophies
1
Location
London
Website
www.youtube.com
XP
704
Country
just seen that car scene, and there is too much cgi (even his spidey suit is cgi lol), the colour of spiderman's eyes is not black, it's white in Tobey Maguire's movies and he yaps too much.
 

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,734
Country
United States
Hmm who talks more Spiderman or Deadpool? Either way I've always found Spiderman talkative. Most of the time its just sarcasm.

Spider-Man makes quips and jokes as he fights his enemies, often to bolster his own confidence and to distract the enemies he's facing. Still, it's generally restrained.

Deadpool blabbers and rants endlessly even when out of combat. He's called "The Merc With a Mouth" for a reason.
 

Arnold Schwarzen

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
786
Trophies
1
Age
77
Website
gov.ca.gov
XP
323
Country
United States
I will be seeing this on the 4th in 3D at my local theater, cannot wait! As a fan of the (latter era) 616 universe comics I believe this version of Peter Parker/Spidey is already more accurate if I'm to judge by what I've seen so far. Although I think Tobey's Parker is a little more accurate to the character in the way older issues (mostly in appearance). The web slinging looks really amazing like it was brought out of the panels. Everything else looks great and I'll just say I look forward to the whole package.
 

Hyro-Sama

I'm from the fucking future.
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
4,330
Trophies
2
Age
30
Location
After Earth
XP
3,613
Country
I just saw Spiderman. It was alright. A bit depressing IMO. If a sequel is made then that will perform better. Similar to the current Batman trilogy.
 

adamshinoda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
300
Trophies
1
Age
31
Location
Ha Noi
Website
Visit site
XP
347
Country
"In a scene during the end credits, the now-imprisoned Connors speaks with a mysterious man who turns out to be Lord Voldemort."

LOL Wikipedia is full of funny guys.
 

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,734
Country
United States
I just saw Spiderman. It was alright. A bit depressing IMO. If a sequel is made then that will perform better. Similar to the current Batman trilogy.

Is the whole plot focused around a gas that turns people into Island of Doctor Moreau-style animal-human hybrids? Not going to lie, that sounds mighty silly.

EDIT: Also, this review just came in...

uYjw0.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

Hadrian

Literally as TIGHT as a gnats chuff.
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
16,991
Trophies
3
Age
43
XP
5,054
Country
United States
Saw this last night with low expectations. I have to say it was pretty damn great.

Personally I thought the tone of the whole movie with spot on, a lot more humour than I expected and it's done very nicely. Despite the hair, Andrew Garfield is pretty damn brilliant for the role as both Spider-Man & Peter Parker, it was good to have Spidey wisecracking and being a jerk to the criminals. The only thing that was hard to believe was how a chap like him didn't get female attention any sooner! Regardless of if someone is shy around girls, the pretty guys will get the pretty girls coming to them anyway...but whatever its a film about a man getting powers of a Spider and then fighting a scientist who morphs into a lizard so best ignore that! The acting is pretty damn good, I think everyone played their roles well. I'm a little sad that one of the characters died as he would have been good for future films...also that Stan Lee cameo is the best cameo he has done.

The action sequences were something I was worried about going into this movie but they were nicely done but I felt that maybe Spidey was too good as a fighter considering he was only just bitten. The drama side was done very well too, the previous comment about it being "depressing" is a bit much, I didn't feel it was whatsoever and when we did get a Parker crying scene it wasn't overly drawn out and it wasn't too long before we got to some action/humour.

Currently I'd rate it higher than the other Spidey films, I think they did things just right whereas the original trilogy had problems with the drama side and I felt that Maguire was decent enough Parker but not a good Spider-Man. What this film does well is show that with a mask on Peter, like a lot of shy people, comes out of his shell when people can't see the real person. In the previous films for me Maguire played both characters pretty much the same and that is why I feel the new movie is better. There were some minor flaws here and there but then its rare that films get to be perfect.

Safe to say I'm happy with Sony continuing to do the movies instead of Marvel and while before I thought it was an unnecessary reboot once I have seen the film I feel it was the right choice.


Is the whole plot focused around a gas that turns people into Island of Doctor Moreau-style animal-human hybrids? Not going to lie, that sounds mighty silly.
Not really, there is gas at some point that turns some into lizard/human hybrid but its a minor part.
 

Arnold Schwarzen

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
786
Trophies
1
Age
77
Website
gov.ca.gov
XP
323
Country
United States
Copy pasta-ing short opinion from my own Facebook (with minor edits):

I thought the film was amazing! I would think that if you love Spider-Man comics you'd definitely be pleased. The only books I read are of the original Marvel 616 universe (read just a bit of the 60's and 70's ones, some 80's but mostly 90's to current) and I can tell you Spidey is very accurate to his comic book self. This is a big thing I've always wanted to see on the big screen and I'm very happy to see it accomplished. Thank God! The web swinging is awesome and really believable, puts the scenes in the Raimi films to shame. Also iconic poses throughout. That being said I loved the film as a whole and the only thing I dislike is having to wait for more :P
 

Hadrian

Literally as TIGHT as a gnats chuff.
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
16,991
Trophies
3
Age
43
XP
5,054
Country
United States
Copy pasta-ing short opinion from my own Facebook (with minor edits):

I thought the film was amazing! I would think that if you love Spider-Man comics you'd definitely be pleased. The only books I read are of the original Marvel 616 universe (read just a bit of the 60's and 70's ones, some 80's but mostly 90's to current) and I can tell you Spidey is very accurate to his comic book self. This is a big thing I've always wanted to see on the big screen and I'm very happy to see it accomplished. Thank God! The web swinging is awesome and really believable, puts the scenes in the Raimi films to shame. Also iconic poses throughout. That being said I loved the film as a whole and the only thing I dislike is having to wait for more :P
With the webslinging and how Peter gets to do it is just perfect in this film. In the comics its hard to believe that a kid can make all of these just on his own and with his basic allowance. The original trilogy did the "Peter makes the webs biologically" thing which I guess makes sense but not really true to the comics, this film though I think they got it spot on.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    They used half and gave it back
    +2
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @BigOnYa, I had an idea for a thread on the retro games forum about old games and crt/scanlines filters and stuff but idk how to express the body text or idk
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    dunno if you undestand what I mean
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    The Simpson's already did that...
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I have an idea for a new lord of the rings series
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Simpson's did it...
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Elon as frodo
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    The Twitter/X hat determines your fate. (oh wait, wrong movie)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    You must never wear the blue check mark
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I wonder how many Broncos fans cellphones Kelsy's brother will smash today.
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    he's
  • Faust03 @ Faust03:
    twitter is a very toxic website
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Nuh uh
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    An underrated opinion: While Bluesky as a platform is better than Twitter, Bluesky's userbase won't be better than Twitter as people are saying because everyone from the non-bootleg site are moving to the bootleg one expecting for themselves to change with their attitude, but that never works like that.
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    I will say though: Bluesky as a micro-blogging site? Needs a bit more oomph and I would officially like it better than Twiter. Can't even post gifs on that site, like what the fuck?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Diarrhea is toxic
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Can you post milfs though?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gilfs
    +2
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Kilfs. (Ken knows)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gay
    +1
  • NinStar @ NinStar:
    fake and gay
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Fake news is hot
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Fake news is hot