ron975 said:
Tonitonichopchop said:
I believe it's a combination of two factors. One being that hackers have realized how awful Sony is with security, and two being that people are pissed with their actions in suing Geohot.
I agree. I think that the moment Anonymous announced the DDOS attacks, the other Hackers started working.
DDoS attacks aren't hacking dawg. A DDoS attack in no way means that Sony is easy to hack, just that their servers aren't good at taking the heavy stress of thousands upon thousands of instant requests. DDoS is about as far from hacking as something considered an attack online can get. If I was hacker, I wouldn't think that all because Sony could be hit by a DDoS attack successfully meant that their server sucked. With the two not being related in the least, it would be a fairly ridiculous assumption.
In not wanting to read through the past few pages in their entirety; for those saying Sony deserved it, they didn't and don't. Sony may have fucked up, but you need to learn where to place the blame. It would have never been an issue had the hackers not made it a point to steal the information. As it stands, nothing has happened in over a month in regards to the information, so it's debatable whether the people actually got all useful information, or if they are just scared of trying to use it.
What people also need to realize is that
nobody is unhackable. Praise Microsoft all you want, but at any time, a hacker could easily make it a point to bring the company to its knees. There are always people that know where the holes are, and how to exploit them to the maximum. Ignorance, as fun as it is, is stupid to rely on time and time again. If you want to say getting hacked means you have bad security,
then you better tell the US government to create some unstoppable security with the Pentagon being breached by hackers more than once.