Software Versioning

  • Thread starter Thread starter onlypuppy7
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 1,824
  • Replies Replies 9
  • Likes Likes 1
I would just flip a coin.

All I would suggest is be consistent and avoid too many decimals if it’s expected to be said regularly e.g. 3.1.4.1
 
  • Like
Reactions: Minox
Thank you.
You're welcome. For me it all just comes down to how much support the program is going to have after release - long term is always :

major. Minor. Bugfix. (3.4.2)

Short term :

Major. Minor (3.4)

For one offs they usually just get code names - could really be anything and really depends on the program so if it was something related to the program... I just like hearing people saying things like "I'm having a problem with Donkey... Capybara was much more stable"
 
You're welcome. For me it all just comes down to how much support the program is going to have after release - long term is always :

major. Minor. Bugfix. (3.4.2)

Short term :

Major. Minor (3.4)

For one offs they usually just get code names - could really be anything and really depends on the program so if it was something related to the program... I just like hearing people saying things like "I'm having a problem with Donkey... Capybara was much more stable"
It's long term, and I also want to use x.x.x
 
For me it's important to have the less ammount of digits possible, it's easier to remember which version is which.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum