i didn't say that, don't twist what i saidYou convinved me, women should have unlimited free abortions
i didn't say that, don't twist what i saidYou convinved me, women should have unlimited free abortions
so you're against it? what are you? some kinda women hater? Middle ages calledi didn't say that, don't twist what i said
Ugh you're annoying. Not gonna bother answering you anymore. It was you who said women can't be sexually liberated while men can be, not meso you're against it? what are you? some kinda women hater? Middle ages called
Ugh you're annoying. Not gonna bother answering you anymore. It was you who said women can't be sexually liberated while men can be, not me
your comment wich was '''' how many % of abortions are even by rape victims, and how many of trash-tier women who just F*ck everything? Abortion isn't the problem, it's our society, the hookup culture and sexual liberation of women ''''dear friend, I was talking about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_revolution not about a "sexual liberation of men."
your comment wich was '''' how many % of abortions are even by rape victims, and how many of trash-tier women who just F*ck everything? Abortion isn't the problem, it's our society, the hookup culture and sexual liberation of women ''''
wich i responded to so in your eyes it is okay for a man to be sexually liberated but it ain't for a woman ? You clearly said that women being sexually liberated are the problem.
Then you should have used different wording for your original statement since what you commented first doesn't line up with what you just said now. I'm guessing it is because you don't know English that well and used the wrong wording. If that is the case then forgot what i said since i took it in a different manner and it probably wasn't your intention of stating that since well bad wording i guess.please think of the whole sentence. it's the hookup culture, our society which promotes promiscuity AND the sexual liberation of women which all made it so women can be as irresponsible as can be.
At the end of the day, a woman decides if they have sex with some man or not and how.
If you date some girl she's not going to get pregnant unless she makes a conscious decision to have sex with you. it's thatsimple
And don't come with the rape argument that's such a fragment of the actual abortions.
If done sufficiently early, it's not murder. It's not a life yet, just a lump of flesh. Nothing has formed yet that could be considered a person, it has no thoughts, no feelings, no senses.So we're seeing a lot of press coverage over the entire abortion issue lately due to some states outlawing the practice. I see no problem with this. I mean, if you're protesting to protect a tree why not protect a human life? If you are having sexual relationships then your are usually taking the risk of becoming pregnant. Not ready to be a parent - keep your pants on. Of course, there is the minority of people who are impregnated against their own will. Rape sucks, but murder is murder. Rape usually doesn't result in the baby being mis-figured or deformed (which is the case if someone in your immediate gene pool - which happens in even less of the situations). So is the murder justified in these cases? I don't think murder can be justified. Murder is murder. However, I do see Trump's point of view saying that Alabama's Law (which outlaws abortion in all cases except when a mother's life is in danger). It's a lose-lose situation in that case and I'm not a women nor have ever been in the position where if I give birth I might die so I can't really assume to tell anyone else anything about that. Just something inside of me tells me that killing babies is not right.
I know that the majority of abortions don't fit into the minority categories so I'm relieved that there will be less overall needless death, but if democrats really cared about only the minority then why is it allowable to cry about the majority of the popular vote in our last election? It's not supposed to be the Governments job to tell a mother what do to with her baby, but since we accept the Governments decisions that regulate most of our lives already I don't see any harm in saving a life. If money is an issue then society shouldn't abandon the kid (which is what the parent shouldn't do to begin with - the parents decided to have sex and should raise the child).
We already fail children in so many ways, but at least give them a fighting chance! Murder is murder. I'm glad these laws are being passed.
Here is what our President said about the issue ...
lack of religion does not breed chaos in matters of morality. i usually find the opposite to be true. when you put people above the dogma, you're more likely to find solutions that benefit people.I'm not so sure I agree with that. In the absence of order, chaos reigns. I mean sure, if we remove religion it may stop both sides being bitterly entrenched but then it wouldn't be much of a debate with everyone being pro choice. There would be nothing left to discuss.
Seems as though it would be logical to accept one's responsibility when you make a mistake and decide it's time to stop sleeping around, settle down and raise the life you helped bring into this world.
Then, in the event you aren't capable of providing for the child, there are many sterile yet loving people out there (who have the financial means) yearning for that child.
Are you an incel?how many % of abortions are even by rape victims, and how many of trash-tier women who just F*ck everything? Abortion isn't the problem, it's our society, the hookup culture and sexual liberation of women
That's an inane and defensive response that basically confirms his questionare you a furry?
You broach a deep subject concerning morality. Where does morality come from? Some say morality has it's roots in religion but they are in error.lack of religion does not breed chaos in matters of morality. i usually find the opposite to be true. when you put people above the dogma, you're more likely to find solutions that benefit people.
also, why is sleeping around a bad thing? that's another religous axiom that was created back before we really knew how stuff worked and incorrect knowledge created bad rules. it helped them create lineages and ownership, because that's how their world worked. our world works differently.
continual consent, do it safe, communicate effeciently and often, and minimize dogma and assumptions. not having sex has no inherent moral value. having sex has no inherent moral value. it's only what you personally feel about it. which is 100% valid, free to change, and you do you. but you can't tell other people how they should feel about it.
sex isn't a bad thing and shouldn't be considered a crime that needs punishing. before or after marriage, it's the same thing. i think that singular bad idea really holds back some folks from actually having the actual discussion at hand.
Why Cots why? I really wasn't ready for the abortion issue to be discussed.
First of all, if, each time a woman chose to abort, she died as a result, the number of abortions would significantly decrease. Also it would eliminate debate.
Also, to address those who refer to the unwanted life as a virus, parasite, blob of cells or crotch goblin.
Would your opinion be the same if the topic was an endangered species such as the the northern white rhinoceros? As with all endangered species on our world, scientists, activists and average citizens alike are concerned for them and rightly so. We want to fight as hard as we can to keep them from becoming extinct.
Even though humans are nowhere near extinction and many on the left would bring the overpopulation argument, although the white rhino is important, each and every human life is vastly more important.
Even we do not dare to categorize a white rhino pregnancy as a parasite or weed so then we should not do the same with a human. Humans have infinitely more potential. Humans have higher cognitive functions and more advanced reasoning. Humans drive trucks, operate advanced technologies and create cures for deadly disease.
Do you see any of the animals on the endangered list driving trucks?
Also if your pro abortion stances had merit and your views became law of the land many years ago, then many of you potentially may have been aborted and you would never have existed to engage in this debate or for that matter, ever have signed up at the temp. Many of the positive things that you each contribute to society may have been lost if your mothers were as steadfastly in favor of abortion. Just consider all of the programmers, coders, designers, engineers, mathematicians and other intelligent people who may never have been born because they weren't given that chance.
Many have argued that we have no right to tell a woman what she can do with her body but by that same token, the unborn life should be given the same respect and consideration.
How do we know that baby is not going to grow up to solve world hunger or cure all disease? Who are we to interfere?
One last point I wish to make. It boils down to responsibility. Those in favor of abortion, do not wish to be held accountable for their irresponsible actions. Yes, yes I know the whole rape, incest and unplanned pregnancy in wedlock arguments but those account for only a tiny portion of world wide pregnancies. As others have mentioned in this thread keep your legs closed and keep your pants zipped but if and when that fails, be prepared to accept your responsibility. A baby is one of the consequences of not being responsible and the only person you have to blame is yourself and your partner. But people want to step out and play and be promiscuous and then take the easy way out. Instead of being a responsible adult they become pro choice.