To be fair, Rogero does not have a website like Rebug so it is an unfair comparison. I don't believe you are "spitting" on Rogero, but pointing out Rebug's log details and providing your interpretations of Rogero's practices of releasing multiple CFW versions doesn't make the comparison "factual."Thanks for the warm welcomes @Magsor.
That being said, I haven't spitted on any CFW, all I'm doing is stating facts.
I agree. I didn't opt for Rogero CFW because I drew his name out of a hat. In all honesty, Rogero's multiple versions of CFW releases was one of the reasons that I went with it. I never interpreted the multiple versions of the same CFW as fail/patch/update, but instead saw it as the works of an active participant of the scene.I don't have anything against Rogero and he has done a lot for the PS3 scene and I thank him for that and he has my respect and gratitude,
Again, I agree. But consider those of us already on Rogero 4.xx.... Switching to Rebug from Rogero is quasi-dangerous by your own point of view, no?He always rushes and releases his CFW as if it's a race and it's always full of bugs when he first releases it and he has to update it multiple times to fix them. This is not good because it's bad for people to keep flashing their firmware. This is a firmware, not an app which would be very easy to update and there would be no harm in updating it as many times as you want.
Nah, I think people should think twice about updating to the latest and greatest CFW. I've been sitting on Rogero 4.30 v2.05 and have no plans on updating to Roger 4.40; these aren't "service packs."I believe he should take his time to test his CFW properly and only release it when it's ready (which is what Rebug do) instead of releasing it and updating it multiple times. There was actually no point in releasing an incomplete 4.40 CFW now because everything still works on 4.30 CFW including PSN and latest games.