FenrirWolf said:I'm downloading it just to see what's inside.
Okay, I'm digging through this and trying to dice the ginormous readme into digestible portions and I haven't found anything that would work on a 4.0 LU64 wii. There's the typical IOS35 downgrading applications, but nothing we haven't seen before.
needs moar cboot2 and less pointless downgrading
There's also a collection of tools for patching ISOs: Generic Wii Patcher, Trucha Signer, and Wii Game Language Patcher. Of the three I've only heard of Trucha Patcher and isn't that thing really old?
WiiPower said:If it really contains IOS35 downgrade, it's not just stupid, it's dangerous to follow that guide on a LU64+ Wii. Generic Wii Patcher is for patching .dol files, it's able to patch 001, 002 and video modes. And Trucha Signer is similar to WiiScrubber, it allows to open and manipulate .isos.
Mark McDonut said:People should just make packs of the links to the stickies in this forum.
Actually that's not a bad idea and is pretty brick-safe.
Emphasis by me. (The rationale here is likely that giving it as a WAD eliminates anti-scam screens. As a wad, you'd never know this was freeware if Hit-man Mack tried to sell it. Remember Homebreware?)Bootmii Website said:All rights reserved. You may not sell or redistribute this software.
QUOTE said:There is currently only one way to install cIOS on LU64, and that's using cboot2 under Bootmii as an IOS i believe. Even with that method you need at least rev11 ("LU64 fix") of cIOS for it to even run on the new consoles. The latest i see in the pack is rev8. The oldest is cios_fix, which goes way back.
Wait..... I'm confused. In order to use cboot2, you need a vulnerable boot1. But LU64's wouldn't have a vulnerable boot1 since they're newer.
Also, doesn't cIOS rev12+ work on LU64's?
Emphasis by me. (The rationale here is likely that giving it as a WAD eliminates anti-scam screens. As a wad, you'd never know this was freeware if Hit-man Mack tried to sell it. Remember Homebreware?)QUOTE said:To top it all off, he is violating HBC's license by giving it out as a WAD. If you visit http://bootmii.org/download where you can download the newest Hackmii installer, you see this at the bottom:
Bootmii WebsiteAll rights reserved. You may not sell or redistribute this software.
GamerZFX said:HitmanMack HAS STATED ON A PRIVATE TRACKER THAT:
Anyone who reads english can just look past this kit after reading through the GBATemp section, the Assassin Kit contains only about 3 to 4 outdated softwares, which are the ones that allow your different region Wii games from around the world to function properly. The GBATemp people still have 002 issues because they never saw or followed my Stealth Kit which is part of the Assasssin Kit, Those outdated softwares make almost all worldwide game's compatible to any 3.2 firmware Wii from around the world. There are 8 bad comments on GBATemp about this kit, and about 5 bad comments on WeHackWii, those who don't bother to try things out for themselves are stuck making smart comments, living in the past, looking for solutions, and not being a benefit to anyone.
It's as simple as this, I cannot compare to Waninkoko, but I can use various software to find solutions. Waninkoko is still implementing 002 fixes into his newly created software for example --> http://www.teknoconsolas.es/blog/waninkoko...om-ios38-rev-13
There it states that rev13 does this "Implementado nuevo sistema anti error 002", anyone who knows spanish clearly knows it says "Implemented a new system for anti-error 002", my Stealth Kit, which is implemented in the Assassin Kit has overcomed this issue "COMPLETELY" a while ago. The point is I have hundreds of Wii Users "WORLDWIDE" that can vouch for my work, and the full functionality of any of my kits. 13 ignorant comments around the internet cannot encompass for those who are satisfied, and know the reality of the functionality of my work. I am also not a noob, and I know what I am talking about, especialy when I am capable of helping everyone resolve their issues with Wii modding. Those who criticize wrongfully are the ones who have been living under a rock, and do not know my work.
I hate them too, but figured i'd point the legal issues out as well. They could always simply put a message at the bottom of the home-menu in the HBC itself: "This software is free. If you paid for it, you've been scammed." That'd be much less intrusive than these installer screens, and could allow for redistribution, since the HBC can't be edited w/o source. We saw how well the installer method worked.s3phir0th115 said:QUOTE said:There is currently only one way to install cIOS on LU64, and that's using cboot2 under Bootmii as an IOS i believe. Even with that method you need at least rev11 ("LU64 fix") of cIOS for it to even run on the new consoles. The latest i see in the pack is rev8. The oldest is cios_fix, which goes way back.
Wait..... I'm confused. In order to use cboot2, you need a vulnerable boot1. But LU64's wouldn't have a vulnerable boot1 since they're newer.
Also, doesn't cIOS rev12+ work on LU64's?
You're correct. I forgot that cboot2 won't run on an LU64. Hence the reason i put "i think" since i wasn't quite sure. I bothered to look it up only after i posted. (really need to stop doing that!) I had thought it just used the bootmii IOS. Anyway, doesn't IOS16 still run on a 3.4 version LU64? Anyone know? I haven't modded any of these LU64s successfully (other than one that was one of those early "hackable LU64" ones). Usually can't get the old IOS35 to run on them. Does what my friend's did - hang at the WM 1.4 under IOS35 part.
Only really spent time on the LU64 that my friend tried this pack on. Otherwise, all the 64's i've seen were either unmodded, chipped, or bricked. I am no expert on the LU64s, since i don't own one myself. (Got an LU31 here)
Yes cIOS rev12+ supposedly will run on LU64, hence the "at least" rev 11. Could have said "rev11+". You might need to install the LU64 fix rev11 first though then update it.
Emphasis by me. (The rationale here is likely that giving it as a WAD eliminates anti-scam screens. As a wad, you'd never know this was freeware if Hit-man Mack tried to sell it. Remember Homebreware?)s3phir0th115 said:All rights reserved. You may not sell or redistribute this software.QUOTE said:To top it all off, he is violating HBC's license by giving it out as a WAD. If you visit http://bootmii.org/download where you can download the newest Hackmii installer, you see this at the bottom:
Bootmii Website
I can't really blame them. The screen annoys the shit out of me. I see it every time I go to the site and download it, I don't need to see it every time I install it.
Even if they have had trouble with scammers and what not, I think this pisses off the end user more than it frustrates scammers. After all, if they made it a wad that obviously shows that putting those screens won't do anything but piss off end users, as it's clear that scammers can just make wads and eliminate the annoyance.
I thought that cboot2 could run under BootMii IOS and that several people were able to install the LU64 fix with that method...? Or did I miss something?techboy said:Anyway, doesn't IOS16 still run on a 3.4 version LU64? Anyone know?
Yes it does.
To my knowledge it is the only exception to the rule that "LU64+ Wiis can't run older IOS versions".
QUOTE(techboy @ Jun 12 2009, 02:52 PM) You're correct. I forgot that cboot2 won't run on an LU64.
GamerZFX said:HitmanMack HAS STATED ON A PRIVATE TRACKER THAT:
Anyone who reads english can just look past this kit after reading through the GBATemp section, the Assassin Kit contains only about 3 to 4 outdated softwares, which are the ones that allow your different region Wii games from around the world to function properly. The GBATemp people still have 002 issues because they never saw or followed my Stealth Kit which is part of the Assasssin Kit, Those outdated softwares make almost all worldwide game's compatible to any 3.2 firmware Wii from around the world. There are 8 bad comments on GBATemp about this kit, and about 5 bad comments on WeHackWii, those who don't bother to try things out for themselves are stuck making smart comments, living in the past, looking for solutions, and not being a benefit to anyone.
It's as simple as this, I cannot compare to Waninkoko, but I can use various software to find solutions. Waninkoko is still implementing 002 fixes into his newly created software for example --> http://www.teknoconsolas.es/blog/waninkoko...om-ios38-rev-13
There it states that rev13 does this "Implementado nuevo sistema anti error 002", anyone who knows spanish clearly knows it says "Implemented a new system for anti-error 002", my Stealth Kit, which is implemented in the Assassin Kit has overcomed this issue "COMPLETELY" a while ago. The point is I have hundreds of Wii Users "WORLDWIDE" that can vouch for my work, and the full functionality of any of my kits. 13 ignorant comments around the internet cannot encompass for those who are satisfied, and know the reality of the functionality of my work. I am also not a noob, and I know what I am talking about, especialy when I am capable of helping everyone resolve their issues with Wii modding. Those who criticize wrongfully are the ones who have been living under a rock, and do not know my work.
QUOTE said:I thought that cboot2 could run under BootMii IOS and that several people were able to install the LU64 fix with that method...? Or did I miss something?