FireFox 5.0 Final released

Satangel

BEAST
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
10,307
Trophies
1
Age
31
Location
Bruges, Belgium
XP
1,550
Country
Belgium
The changes are a lot less than with the 3.6 to 4.0 jump, but this is mainly because they decided to greatly shorten their release schedule.

Download it here.

Changes:

Improved HTML 5 and CSS3 support
Improved overall performance
Firefox 5.0 Web apps
A Do-Not-Track option
smileipb2.png
 

Nimbus

sudo /usr/bin make-me-a-coffee --nosugar --cream=1
Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
913
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Probably being lazy.
Website
Visit site
XP
321
Country
GODDAYMN!
yay.gif


HELLYEAH!
grog.gif


I've been using this sucka since it was in it's infancy stages of Beta, nice to see it got released so far ahead of schedule. Hope it works, Aurora was it's codename If I remember correctly, and it in beta was more stable than FF 4.0 was entirely, at least for me

Is totally going to be updating when he gets to college today.

Oh and for the record, I've tested these extensions on the FF 5 beta (Aurora) and they work fine without any issues

NoScript
Easy Youtube Video Downloader
Youtube to MP3
Personas
Download Statusbar

By the way, doesn't FF5 no longer use Xulrunner on Linux. If it doesn't thank god, Xulrunner was more of a problem for me than anything else, either that or it's working properly now.
 

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
Oh wow! It's finally faster than IE9. But it won't last. In a few updates it will be over bloated again, just like how 2.5+ did.
 

Nimbus

sudo /usr/bin make-me-a-coffee --nosugar --cream=1
Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
913
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Probably being lazy.
Website
Visit site
XP
321
Country
chartube12 said:
Oh wow! It's finally faster than IE9. But it won't last. In a few updates it will be over bloated again, just like how 2.5+ did.


wtf.gif
What are you talking about, Internet Exploder 9 has always been slower than everything else! Hell Internet Exploder has always been slower than anything no matter what release it's been at.

Don't make me start a Browser War here....JK I never would do such a thing, no I'd reserve that for the EoF!
evil.gif
 

shakirmoledina

Legend
Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
6,613
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
Dar es Salaam
Website
vfootball.co.nf
XP
830
Country
Tanzania
5? i am still stuck on 3 and i love it (though i also use 4 on another computer)
i think the delay form 3 to 4 has made them decide to release 5 probably bcz some important features were reserved from 4 to be put on 5
amazing actually
 

Wizerzak

Because I'm a potato!
Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
2,784
Trophies
1
Age
27
Location
United Kingdom
XP
883
Country
Nimbus said:
chartube12 said:
Oh wow! It's finally faster than IE9. But it won't last. In a few updates it will be over bloated again, just like how 2.5+ did.


wtf.gif
What are you talking about, Internet Exploder 9 has always been slower than everything else! Hell Internet Exploder has always been slower than anything no matter what release it's been at.

Don't make me start a Browser War here....JK I never would do such a thing, no I'd reserve that for the EoF!
evil.gif

have you tried ie9. It's actually pretty good. Personal speed test i did just now between Firefox (Aurora, 6.0a2) and IE9 - (both on second start up):

Firefox: 4.5 seconds
IE9: 2 seconds
 

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
Personally I have never had a problem with IE since 8 came out. But had a few problems with FF from 2.5 til 3.4. I only started using FF again because FaceBook purposely blocks certain features unless ur on ff. Having 2 or more great browsers is a good idea anyways, in case one or 2 get targeted by hackers.
 

Ryupower

Brood
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
2,984
Trophies
1
Website
techmantis.net
XP
2,423
Country
United States
google toolbar work with firefox 5 BUT you may need this (it may let other plugins work as well as it for testing addons, to see if they work on the firefox you are using)

till there an official update to Google toolbar
 

s4mid4re

 
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
1,669
Trophies
0
Website
v4.gbatemp.net
XP
267
Country
United States
Wizerzak said:
Nimbus said:
chartube12 said:
Oh wow! It's finally faster than IE9. But it won't last. In a few updates it will be over bloated again, just like how 2.5+ did.


wtf.gif
What are you talking about, Internet Exploder 9 has always been slower than everything else! Hell Internet Exploder has always been slower than anything no matter what release it's been at.

Don't make me start a Browser War here....JK I never would do such a thing, no I'd reserve that for the EoF!
evil.gif

have you tried ie9. It's actually pretty good. Personal speed test i did just now between Firefox (Aurora, 6.0a2) and IE9 - (both on second start up):

Firefox: 4.5 seconds
IE9: 2 seconds
start-up time/performance is greatly affected by add-ons. I don't know how controlled your test is, but have you disabled add-ons?

but I do agree that ie9 is much better than previous releases.
 

RupeeClock

Colors 3D Snivy!
Member
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
6,498
Trophies
1
Age
34
Website
Visit site
XP
2,990
Country
Seems to be working fine, no outward appearances are different but I may notice things performing better now, I guess.

Incidentally, Firefox 5 still fails the Acid3 test, it scores a 97/100
Which is funny because I recall Firefox 4 getting a 98, maybe.
 

Wizerzak

Because I'm a potato!
Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
2,784
Trophies
1
Age
27
Location
United Kingdom
XP
883
Country
s4mid4re said:
Wizerzak said:
Nimbus said:
chartube12 said:
Oh wow! It's finally faster than IE9. But it won't last. In a few updates it will be over bloated again, just like how 2.5+ did.


wtf.gif
What are you talking about, Internet Exploder 9 has always been slower than everything else! Hell Internet Exploder has always been slower than anything no matter what release it's been at.

Don't make me start a Browser War here....JK I never would do such a thing, no I'd reserve that for the EoF!
evil.gif

have you tried ie9. It's actually pretty good. Personal speed test i did just now between Firefox (Aurora, 6.0a2) and IE9 - (both on second start up):

Firefox: 4.5 seconds
IE9: 2 seconds
start-up time/performance is greatly affected by add-ons. I don't know how controlled your test is, but have you disabled add-ons?

but I do agree that ie9 is much better than previous releases.

nope, no add ons, complete vanilla install on both. In fact, if anything, IE9 has more to load as i'm signed in with my google account on that one (custom background etc.)
 

Nathan Drake

Obligations fulfilled, now I depart.
Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
6,192
Trophies
0
XP
2,707
Country
Internet Explorer has always been substantially slower for me. I do mean substantially. It could take a full minute to get the browser to a point where I could even type, closer to two minutes before I could navigate. Every other browser I've ever installed has been faster.

Pretty cool that FF5 is already out. It would be no surprise if add-on compatibility was still pretty great, if not exactly the same as for FF4. It isn't like FF3 to FF4. They didn't change nearly as many core aspects for this version.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    @SylverReZ that reminds me that my friend sells CRTs he gets cheap or free for hundreds of dollars. people are dumb
    +1
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    And is incredibly annoying.
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    man I just washed my shoes and they look exactly the same as before I washed them :|
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    luckily they didn't fall apart
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    Some CRTs are very much worth the price
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    i used to go out to the recycling center every couple weeks and look at the crts and other electronics people would drop off. Usually screens were broken or severely scratched from being tossed around. Did find a good one here and there, but never anything like a 1080i widescreen crt.
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    Or a good contition 40" Sony Trini that weighs 300 lbs. lol
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    Literally 300 lbs. lolol
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I have a few of those boat anchors in my basement I tried giving away but no one wanted them, So anyone close to Columbus, Ohio area that wants them, (26", 2x 19") please come get, for free.
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    Dont know anyone wants those smaller ones. Most are after larger sizes and the kinda top of the line models
  • RedColoredStars @ RedColoredStars:
    Motion handling and input lag on those things destroy plasmas, led, oled
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    I had some really nice CRTs I should've kept
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    now I have all lcd
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    one in particular I regret getting rid of oh well :|
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    the Sonys and stuff I don't care about
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    and used LCD are hard to sell I can imagine.. not worth much
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    @SylverReZ where do u lurk
  • a_username_that_isnt_cool @ a_username_that_isnt_cool:
    Is it piracy if it was released for free? Not in my opinion, but I also think it's not piracy if buying it isn't owning it, and it's not piracy if you can't buy it from the original creators anymore.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Free release can have loopholes where they still make money through ads
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    sigh
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @a_username_that_isnt_cool, could you change your username?
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    i guess not...
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    yawn
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: yawn