Some people are smarter than others and try to help themWhy do some people have more than 10 posts in this thread passive aggressively acting like Nintendo's lawyers intern?
Why do you care so much?
Some people are smarter than others and try to help themWhy do some people have more than 10 posts in this thread passive aggressively acting like Nintendo's lawyers intern?
Why do you care so much?
No it doesn't. Especially with the MEME ban being abolished it was stated in the highest court in Europe that it is perfectly fine to do so for parody and other uses that doesn't claim you as the user. According to what you're saying, reaction videos, reviews, Jezus even me posting a picture in front of a Mario cardboard would be deemed illegal. It doesn't work that way
If ToS are not valid and EULAs too, you would not have any right to use their serviceToS not valid in some countries, EULAs are just paper information without legal ramifications and people are generally not nice in here
Correct! This is why the EULAs and ToS are generalized and not applicable everywhere. Case closed!If ToS are not valid and EULAs too, you would not have any right to use their service
the thing is Nintendo does take down a lot of videos they shouldn't. I kept uploading a video showing how bad the framerate was in the Wii U version when it launched and Nintendo kept taking it down so I kept uploading it. I agree with you that they have some right regarding some videos but not all and they do take a lot of videos down that they shouldn't. Like when Angry Joe uploaded some Nintendo game reviews and Nintendo kept taking it down is not legal for them to do soReaction videos are certainly illegal as they aren't deemed transformative. Just adding yourself reacting to a video that someone else made is more than enough grounds for the person to issue a content claim on the video. Reviews are different since they add more than enough content to make the video transformative. You posing front of a picture of Mario, again, adds enough new content to be deemed transformative. a Parody video? Well it depends on how it's done. If it just shows footage of a game with someone talking behind it then no, it's not enough to be deemed transformative and Nintendo would have more than enough of a claim to have the video taken down. When it comes to "fair use" the law isn't clear enough, there's a lot of grey area that can, and IS, abused on both sides. And yeah, it IS how it works because of how much of a grey area Fair Use is, especially when it comes to videogames
Ok. Thanks that you admit being wrong all the time. Don't you feel stupid right now? You should!Correct! This is why the EULAs and ToS are generalized and not applicable everywhere. Case closed!
the thing is Nintendo does take down a lot of videos they shouldn't. I kept uploading a video showing how bad the framerate was in the Wii U version when it launched and Nintendo kept taking it down so I kept uploading it.
I was talking over it. No sound was used from the video footage itself. It's the same when angry joe tried to review botw and other Nintendo games but Nintendo kept taking down the videoAnd were you JUST showing game footage and nothing else?
Not hard but impossibleEven with the salt it is hard
I was talking over it. No sound was used from the video footage itself
*pat pat* https://itpolitik.blogspot.com/2011/12/vad-ar-eula-och-hur-man-ingar-ett-avtal.html - Oh look, I got another source with even more sources! Yaaaay! Stop embarrasing yourself. I've asked again for YOU to provide counter arguments. Since you don't your arguments are null and void.Ok. Thanks that you admit being wrong all the time. Don't you feel stup8d right now? You should!
It is, it was literally a minute and seeing I was talking about the framerate drops and showing it it is informative. How do you explain then Angry joe constantly getting his videos taken down by Nintendo when he tries to review Nintendo games ?But the footage itself also counts. And since the only thing you did was add your voice the it isn't deemed transformative enough so of course Nintendo took it down
It is, it was literally a minute and seeing I was talking about the framerate drops and showing it it is informative. How do you explain then Angry joe constantly getting his videos taken down by Nintendo when he tries to review Nintendo games ?
lol. What does it say?*pat pat* https://itpolitik.blogspot.com/2011/12/vad-ar-eula-och-hur-man-ingar-ett-avtal.html - Oh look, I got another source with even more sources!
A counter argument is only neccessary if have a valid argument, but you don't. Almost everything you say is just wrong. Even the Super Moderator told you that. Maybe you should just shut up?I've asked again for YOU to provide counter arguments.
I never questioned that. If the EULA is invalid, you don't have any right at all to access their service. Why would you think that you magically get this right when you are banned?In Sweden and many other countries you have to SIGN IT for a EULA or ToS to be valid.
Because they're giving them earnings to them and sold their soul to corporate Nintendo hence why I don't watch them.And how do you explain other reviewers such as, for example,PeanutButterGaming or ProJared not getting their videos taken down when they do the EXACT SAME THING as Joe does? It all comes down to technicalities because the fair use law is super subjective, vague and an extremely large grey area
Because they're giving them earnings to them and sold their soul to corporate Nintendo hence why I don't watch them
*pat pat* https://itpolitik.blogspot.com/2011/12/vad-ar-eula-och-hur-man-ingar-ett-avtal.html - Oh look, I got another source with even more sources! Yaaaay! Stop embarrasing yourself. I've asked again for YOU to provide counter arguments. Since you don't your arguments are null and void.
In Sweden and many other countries you have to SIGN IT for a EULA or ToS to be valid. An "I agree" box means jack since minors, people that have no understanding of the context etc. can agree to something. In Sweden only State and Counties can make "legal jargon" agreements.
Some people in this topic have magic-8-balls and a glass ball to see the future. Or have a 20 year law degree and such to know everything. My advise, ignore them. Commenting without having it tried out is utterly useless.