Homebrew DSi CFW Section?

[bbking67]

Maybe its time to have a DSi CFW section like we do for 3DS...

Really looking forward to some DSi CFW action. I'd love to be able to unlock a bit more horsepower for emulation and homebrew... running DSiWare and DSi enhanced games would also be nice.

 

[iAqua]

Maybe its time to have a DSi CFW section like we do for 3DS...

Really looking forward to some DSi CFW action. I'd love to be able to unlock a bit more horsepower for emulation and homebrew... running DSiWare and DSi enhanced games would also be nice.

This has been brought up multiple times, and I agree completely with you, but it seems the staff are very fickle with making new sections, +1.

 

[ThisIsDaAccount]

I'm sure we'll get one when HiyaCFW is released.

 

[GhostLatte]

It's funny how the Xbox One gets a hacking section from only a PoC exploit, but a subsection can not even be made for the DSi despite a confirmed CFW that will be released soon and general interest in hacking the DSi improving.

 

[CatmanFan]

It's funny how the Xbox One gets a hacking section from only a PoC exploit, but a subsection can not even be made for the DSi despite a confirmed CFW that will be released soon and general interest in hacking the DSi improving.

The source is already on Github by the way, and it can be compiled into a .nds file, but it needs RocketLauncher to work. RocketLauncher isn't even out yet.

 

[GhostLatte]

The source is already on Github by the way, and it can be compiled into a .nds file, but it needs RocketLauncher to work. RocketLauncher isn't even out yet.

What does that have to do with anything?

 

[lAkdaOpeKA]

It's now 2018, EUR and JAP DSi consoles can be easily modded too, new DSi Mode homebrews are being released, there really needs to be a separate section

 

[SCOTT0852]

Please check the timestamps next time.

 

[lAkdaOpeKA]

View attachment 141700
Please check the timestamps next time.

Yes I know, I'm not blind...

 

[AmandaRose]

Yes I know, I'm not blind...

Yes so it is against gbatemp.net rules to post in a dead thread. Any thread that has not been posted in for 6 months or more is a dead thread. So do you now see the problem lol.

 

[lAkdaOpeKA]

Yes so it is against gbatemp.net rules to post in a dead thread. Any thread that has not been posted in for 6 months or more is a dead thread. So do you now see the problem lol.

Mine was just a simple observation, the alternative was making another thread regarding the matter which would've been worse imo

 

[The Catboy]

Yes so it is against gbatemp.net rules to post in a dead thread. Any thread that has not been posted in for 6 months or more is a dead thread. So do you now see the problem lol.

It's also heavily frowned upon to make a new thread when a thread already exist that fills that void.
Since a CFW now exist for the DSi, this thread already fills the void that nullifies the need for a new thread. Basically @zacchi4k did the right thing by bumping this thread over making a new one because there's no reason to make a new one with this one already existing.
Side note, there needs to be a DSi CFW section now that one actually exist.

 

[lAkdaOpeKA]

Yes so it is against gbatemp.net rules to post in a dead thread. Any thread that has not been posted in for 6 months or more is a dead thread. So do you now see the problem lol.

Also the rules only have a "Avoid bumping (reviving) old or new topics; they'll be replied to when they're replied to." paragraphs, which I'm pretty sure refers to people asking a question, not getting answers and bumping the thread in order to make it more visible. Nowhere in the rules there's a finite amount of time after something is considered necrobumping, in fact, nowhere in the rules necrobumping is mentioned either.
Furthermore, I've found this thread where a supervisor says that "There are cases where necrobumping is preferred or justified" (pretty much what @Lilith Valentine said too)

 

[Sha8q]

-