despite chatting with muslims *right here*, muslims who *disapprove* of ISIS, directly debunking your hypothesis that "the evil muslims" are everywhere.
You don't appear to understand my hypothesis, just because some muslims disapprove of ISIS doesn't directly debunk anything.
You definitely are not responsible for the actions of other people, no matter how big of a hyperbole you use. Group responsibility is a totalitarian idea that has no place in contemporary society, if my neighbour kills someone, I'm not an accomplice just because I live in the same building.
No, but you are an accomplice if you agree with him and cheer him on.
Mosques are getting burned down, people are getting killed in reprisal attacks
I don't condone Mosques being burned down, I think anyone responsible should be found and held accountable. However a lot of liberal Muslims do use these isolated occurrences to justify what the terrorists do (as it appears do you).
and the fear of refugees is at an all-time high, and all that is happening in civilized, western countries - they're pretty persecuted. Nobody wants to ban jewish immigration as far as I know.
They aren't persecuted at all. A lot of muslims have congregated in areas because they only want to live with other Muslims, they don't want to integrate and so they don't. They want to look different (which isn't the right way to get a job) and so they don't get a job. That isn't persecution. We've been pretty tolerant for a long time, providing interpreters so that people aren't forced to learn English etc. Apparently it was all in vain as a lot of them secretly (and others not so secretly) still hate us anyway.
I can't speak for the US but in Europe the fear of immigrants is more about the financial impact as we have free health care and unemployment benefits. So if you turn up with your family you will get housed. We just don't want to pay for people to live, just because they are fleeing from ISIS but they then get upset because the west wants to bomb ISIS out of existence.
Good quote that I agree with, but I'm not sure I like the context it's being used in. Your whole argument is giving me strong 1984 vibes.
Whether you like the context or what vibes it's giving you is irrelevant. We have all been conditioned a certain way, which obviously isn't paying off and your feelings are a reaction to that.
It's a mock-religion - they say they've picked Satan as a role model because he was "truly free", but we all know the reason was more immature than that - they just wanted to piss off Christians. "Look at us, we're more than Atheists - we're SATANISTS!" - real mature.
That sounds like pretty much every religion to me.
I didn't say you were, the "You" was anyone reading.
That comparison is extreme to say the least. Having the same religion as someone doesn't mean being associated with that person.
Having the same religion absolutely associates you with other people of that religion. Humans like to label things, including ourselves. If you say you are a vegetarian then I would assume you don't eat meat. If you belong to an organisation that says it's members are better than others and it's ok to murder them, then I would expect all members to have the same view.
There are many christian murderes, it doesn't mean you condone murder if you're christian.
The ten commandments are pretty clear on that, but when a Christian commits a murder in the name of Christianity then Christians do condemn it.
With Charlie Hebdo the Muslim reaction appeared to be "well the victims did draw some pictures".
European countries like UK, France and Russia has kind of had a very shitty attitude with many countries in the world for some centuries now.
In the past yes, there were Muslim invasions of other countries too. You can't use that to justify killing someone today.
As an example, France and the UK have tried so many times to stop my country, Brazil, from growing its own industry that we only stopped being a rural country because World War II happened and we had the opportunity to grow our industry without european intervention. You might think I am exaggerating, but I kid you not. One of my country's president actually received a written threat from France demanding him to halt his plans for investing in our industry.
I would like to see evidence of this. UK politicians blame the EU for lots of things, quite often it's completely fabricated.
Guys I am a good debater in this.. If you are an atheist and want a good debate with a believer like me please quote me!
because its too many pages i don't wanna go through all pages replying to you guys
Well God said himself he put in mankind a feeling giving them theres a GOD
How can you have a good debate with an atheist if you are going to use an argument that requires you to believe in god?
My answer to that is "God didn't say anything because he didn't exist". Just because you have a feeling that god exists and someone wrote that god says he put a feeling in mankind, that doesn't prove anything.
All through the centuries people "worship" stars moon planets ETC everyone on earth is religious. God made us like that
You might be an atheist but there is something that you worship or believe! ALL humans on earth are religious
Just because humanity has looked for things to worship, it doesn't mean we are right to do so.[/QUOTE]
Sad thing is people don't realize religion isn't needed to say "Hey I believe in GOD and the bible"
The word religion is used in various ways, but you seem to be nitpicking.
You do realize unicorn isn't really a one horned horse its a extinct kind of rhino
Dictionary and other google searches will pull this up
There are a lot of theories, until we find evidence then that is all it is.. Or we could invent a religion about them and all we'd need is circular reasoning and remove the need evidence.