Consider the cost of R&D, consider the fact that most people already have phones that track their location. There is no reason for the elites to do that, they already have what they want.
Also, as I've brought up elsewhere, vaccines aren't actually profitable. I think a problem that the right has is they've lost the ability to understand other people.
So, basic question. Which of the following would make oodles more money?
a. Treating symptoms instead of tackling illnesses head on, and waiting until demand is super high and there is no other competition to stop you withholding excess, creating demand, and from draining wallets for all time going forward... or
b. Making a one-time cure for an illness that has strict government guidelines for pricing and distribution
If you answered b, you're playing Capitalism wrong and you must turn in your credit cards to your nearest non-comrade. Now, further down the crazy ladder, we can hit up the microchip option. Which of the following makes more sense to the ultra-wealthy?
a. Spying through already existing means on the vast majority of the general public through common luxuries with no need for any additional cost for equipment (i.e. cell phones, personal computers, and even watches and smart televisions) or
b. Injecting ultra high tech and thus likely ludicrously priced transceivers into everybody via the formerly established largely unprofitable vaccines before partying at freddy fazbear's child sacrifice basement of pizza and satan
And lastly, I have one more question directed at an individual. Which of the following is most likely true?
a. certain users of this forum have convinced themselves that there are tiers of society where they reign supreme and lesser tiers are literally lesser lifeforms that should be killed or at least imprisoned and threatened in order to maintain what status quo they feel comfortable with, and they create an echo chamber with which to insulate themselves from the terrible notion that they might actually have been ignorant and cruel and they might be equal to everyone else on some level, or
b. certain users of this forum have mastered 4d chess and as long as they keep talking, future historians will note their genuis in the endless annals of victory their media sources swear will be owed to them for their zealotry regardless of how their sources are lacking in credibility and diversity and their arguments are riddled with logical inconsistencies and infantile insults
At this point, it seems apparent that the "opposition" is only here to squawk loudly and parade their rebellious individuality as an admirable quality... even while sounding exactly the same as their peers.