Homebrew Clarification Thread - What is going on?

[verifyvenuz]

im discus about the haxs whats wrong with doing that

The fact that it contributes nothing at all. I didn't watch the thing myself, but memchunkhax2 and the like were explained, so I assume it's possible.

S T O P.

 

[ketal]

As for ROP, it has to be done for snshax.

I'm trying to figure out some things for memchunkhax2, imho rop is gonna be needed for both

 

[hacksn5s4]

do games with anti piracy check not work with cias

 

[PixelTheKWolf]

Not really, but some pointers have to be modified at a certain time.

im guessing that time has to be Exact, or else the code wont run properly?

 

[Deleted User]

do games with anti piracy check not work with cias

No. CIA versions work.

Geez, that was a simple-ass question once again...

 

[bi388]

do games with anti piracy check not work with cias

Any game works on emunand that works on the normal system and more. So yes they work.

 

[verifyvenuz]

im guessing that time has to be Exact, or else the code wont run properly?

Pretty much.

I'm trying to figure out some things for memchunkhax2, imho rop is gonna be needed for both

Darn, that sucks

 

[TuxSH]

They work.

 

[hacksn5s4]

Pretty much.


Darn, that sucks

does this mean the hax will take more then 1 try to work

 

[ketal]

do games with anti piracy check not work with cias

shutdown -h -force -t 000

I wish that command could work on people

 

[Mrrraou]

im guessing that time has to be Exact, or else the code wont run properly?

Well, I don't think it is, but it has to happen before a certain thing.

 

[TuxSH]

shutdown -h -force -t 000

I wish that command could work on people

sudo killall -9 hype_and_spam

 

[PixelTheKWolf]

Well, I don't think it is, but it has to happen before a certain thing.

well, from what i can tell, i think they are trying to load a page in a chunk, then do something in that page in a certain amount of time?

 

[Garcia98]

shutdown -h -force -t 000

I wish that command could work on people

Well, that command doesn't even work on Linux...

 

[ketal]

Well, that command doesn't even work on Linux...

In fact, that's a Windows command

 

[Mrrraou]

well, from what i can tell, i think they are trying to load a page in a chunk, then do something in that page in a certain amount of time?

They are trying to map a particular memory region to userland memory accessible from the current process.

 

[PixelTheKWolf]

They are trying to map a particular memory region to userland memory accessible from the current process.

oh, so its linking a page (im going to refer to it as a page) of memory in the kernel into the userland area? well, that would explain the kernel access part of it.
Edit: I'm sort of imaging 2 closed boxed, then you attach a line to each of those boxes without opening them, or by very carefully opening them. would that be a good term? as in, one box is kernel, the other is userland, and the line is the "Connection?"

 

[ketal]

oh, so its linking a page (im going to refer to it as a page) of memory in the kernel into the userland area? well, that would explain the kernel access part of it.

At the moment there are problems trying to make the timer work. I wonder if the kernelobj address for that is correct

 

[julian20]

if you want to know how it works, read this OP:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/wip-memchunkhax-2.407006/

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

At the moment there are problems trying to make the timer work. I wonder if the kernelobj address for that is correct

The addresses of these KObjects are correct. They got returned into the stack after calling the svc. We made our own functio in asm which calls the svc and write the returnd location into a paramter.

I, TuxSH and mid-kid found these pointers in the stack. After that Steveice10 joined our group

 

[dankzegriefer]

if you want to know how it works, read this OP:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/wip-memchunkhax-2.407006/

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


The addresses of these KObjects are correct. They got returned into the stack after calling the svc. We made our own functio in asm which calls the svc and write the returnd location into a paramter.

STOP SPEAKING IN COMPUTER!