If rehab worked 100% then the death penalty could be abolished, but until then people still need capital punishment.
If I`m not mistaken, it sounds like your opinion is that people who are not "cured" should be executed? So that would mean that drug dealers are free to live, as they
can be rehabilitated (despite the potential harm that they can still cause to people), but people with a mental disabilities should be executed, since there`s no hope for them?
I also think that you`ve misunderstood the word "need". We don`t
need capital punishment. The very foundations of our world aren`t falling apart at the
tectonic plates? seams because we don`t have capital punishment.
I`m rather interested as to why you think it`s something we need.
No, you misunderstood me. What I am saying when using a drug dealer as an example (In this case he is addicted to the drugs he sells) that the odds are he will stay off the streets selling drugs because of what he went through in rehab. Also you misunderstand me about the people with pre-existing mental disorders. I myself am Bi-Polar, and have had several bouts of manic episodes, and very nearly killed someone. I was lucky there was someone to prevent me from grabbing the knife. What I said and meant was that you cannot force someone to take their medicine. The only way to do that would be to throw someone in a Mental Institution. This place is worse than jail, not only can the overseers be abusive, but people are actually crazy there. I did not say to kill these unfortunates, because that is a type of thinking similar to Hitler.
We need Capital Punishment for people who just don't get it. People who would leave the world a better place if they were dead. Killer that are still out there, people who roam free and take pleasure in the screams of the people that they kill. This is the very reason why we NEED the death penalty.
Uncle FEFL said:
Sterl500 said:
I support the death penalty with open arms. I just wish that we knew the people who are on death row are 100% guilty. Rehab for drug abuse will work, and if they are a drug dealer then odds are they will not be back on the street if they went to jail. The only thing wrong with rehab is that you cannot rehabilitate someone with an existing mental disorder. Something like Schizophrenia or Bi-Polar. These are out of reach for treatment with the individual, and even then you cannot make them take their meds unless they go to the loonybin. Then that's where the men in white coats say nighty night.
If rehab worked 100% then the death penalty could be abolished, but until then people still need capital punishment.
I still think to cut down costs they should go back to a noose around the gizzard. It is so much more humane than the lethal injections now, and a lot cheaper. When set up properly, the noose tightens around the neck and sharply breaks the spine at a certain point. They drift into unconsciousness immediately and suffocate. Without knowing what is going on. It may looks painful, but when done the right way it is very humane. The things that hurt were the hangings in the old west. There they just suffocate to death, and a gunshot was even a better way to go.
In my mind, if a person is convicted of murder then they should not rot in jail. The life in jail is very cushy, maybe the people aren't friendly but they have shelter, food, water, tv, entertainment, pay, and basic necessities. This is better than someone who premeditated an act against humanity with an intent to kill deserves. The exceptions are the people who drink and drive. These people should be given a second chance. Not only do they not know what they are doing most of the time but they can be rehabilitated.
EDIT: Missed a word.
My $1.50 worth.
It is becoming clear to me that you don't know the true value of a human life. When dealing with capital punishment, remember that a person is being
killed under the name of law, it isn't some nighty-night nap and they go to Heaven/hell or whatever it is they go. That person, regardless of his/her choices, is being murdered.
If you murdered someone, would you want to be put to death, or would you like to live? Regardless of your decision, would you even think it fair that someone gets to be the judge of whether you
live, or die? In my opinion, dealing justice does not include dealing death to those who break the law.
The value of human life means nothing if a person blatantly disregards this. If a person kills in anything other than self defense or war in cold blood, then the value of human life means nothing to this individual. Why give the benefit of a second chance to a person who killed another in cold blood to traffic drugs or for revenge. You must not understand that to killers the life of a human is no more than the dirt beneath your feet. People like this are scourges to humanity, and don't deserve to keep the life that has had the chance to murder innocents.
QUOTE(Sir-Fritz @ Sep 10 2010, 12:37 AM)