They announced last month that they are working on a warm/coldboot for the new patched switchs
Actually I forgot about that. Will be interesting to see how this pans out!
They announced last month that they are working on a warm/coldboot for the new patched switchs
Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.Blocking or deleting error reports are the reason for bans. So this is definitely not a solution for playing online with cfw.
Not sure what you mean by safer here. If you mean getting bricked, Fusee Gelee utilizes an actual brick with AutoRCM. Outside of that and thanks to RCM, being bricked is pretty easy to fix. With a NAND backup, we can recover from everything except for a payload that fries the battery (which hasn't been created...yet). If you mean safer from a banning perspective, well, the question speaks for itself.I think I used that part of the terminology badly ... What I was trying to suggest was a simpler (and safer tho) method to execute the CFW in Switch as in 3DS was achieved. Anyway, could the sigpatches be injected into the console?
Not sure what you mean by safer here. If you mean getting bricked, Fusee Gelee utilizes an actual brick with AutoRCM. Outside of that and thanks to RCM, being bricked is pretty easy to fix. With a NAND backup, we can recover from everything except for a payload that fries the battery (which hasn't been created...yet). If you mean safer from a banning perspective, well, the question speaks for itself.
Also, we already can inject signature patches into the console and we have been for quite a while now. This needs to be done via a CFW or more specifically a bootloader that is capable of injecting said signature patches. This also blurs the line between bootloader and CFW as the big name CFWs double as bootloaders except for Atmosphere which will be using its own bootloader called Fusee.
They do have unreleased warmboot exploits which accomplish what you are referring to. However, they have not given any clear indication on a release date for said exploits. It is possible they may release some of them alongside these early builds of Atmosphere but only time will tell. Just be aware that such methods exist and are confirmed to work on firmwares 4.1 and below.I was referring to '' sure '' in terms of avoiding modifications that are made via hardware that, some average user could mess with the pins and damage them, either by inserting the clip wrongly or making contact with the clip 4. Although thanks for answering to my question.
To develop on that I think SciresM originally said he would release such exploits for FW up to 3.0.0 along with Atmosphere. Now will he keep them until Atmo 1.0 or will he release them with 0.7, no idea. For FW between 3.0.1 and 4.1 he doesn't have any curent plans I believe.They do have unreleased warmboot exploits which accomplish what you are referring to. However, they have not given any clear indication on a release date for said exploits. It is possible they may release some of them alongside these early builds of Atmosphere but only time will tell. Just be aware that such methods exist and are confirmed to work on firmwares 4.1 and below.
Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Someone was banned because they lacked error reports on this forum. Saw it last night but no idea where the post is. I did a lot of lurking last night and can't recall where I saw it for the life of me.Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Someone was banned because they lacked error reports on this forum. Saw it last night but no idea where the post is. I did a lot of lurking last night and can't recall where I saw it for the life of me.
They called Nintendo about their ban and the representative told them the reason.
This info has also been posted to the pinned ban thread so further discussion should be held there lest posts will be removed here for going off-topic.After an hour long phone call with Nintendo my ban was the result of a clear log after receiving logs on my previous connection with the eshop so clearly your wrong on it not being risky .
Check out the banned thread.Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Not the official version .Will there be signature patches and NSP installing?
Me confirmed from a Nintendo supervisor after an hour phone call .Find me 1 person that was banned because they deleted error reports.
I don't know why so many people are saying this is a thing. Could Nintendo have the ability to see that you have no reports? Maybe but I haven't seen a single person banned that wasn't fucking with CDN, SX OS Online or LayeredFS yet I see a lot of people that are not banned that clear reports daily.
Its against the law for them not to disclose it you just have to argue that clearly first call they said that I tampered with my system the next call i escalated the mater to supervisor he was actually cool about the situation he said even with error reporting off when you connect to eshop logs are sent against your cert after that if there is a mismatch you go on the list then they ban in waves so you will get banned during a wave and not instant .Im surprised they told you the exact reason