Additional info regarding the CycloDS iEvolution

[quartercast]

TC +1, Costello -1

however,

TC = -999
Costello = 999

Thankyou.

 

[Oveneise]

... They should really figure out how to play DSiware roms. Otherwise, its just the camera and not many games use DSi ware features. :/

 

[xist]

To be fair, If the TeamCyclops forums were up this probably wouldn't have happened.

 

[Oveneise]

To be fair, If the TeamCyclops forums were up this probably wouldn't have happened.

Yeah whats up with that?! They've been down for like a year. Maybe they are spending too much money on their WOW accounts or something...

 

[Rydian]

Why am I not surprised from this at all? And now, there's no point of it at all because...all it does is give access to the DSi's special stuff. RAM? Not really needed,It's not good to try to talk about programming stuff when you don't.

The difference between 4 megs of RAM and 16 is going to be the difference between gimped features, or fleshed-out features.

and if it's software-enabled, it'll hit the SCDSTWO eventually. The cameras? Come on. Who doesn't have a phone with at least something of a camera?I don't have a DSTwo or a phone. Considering how often homebrew stuff is made so people can use one device for many things (instead of having to buy new stuff all the time), I think you're completely missing the point.

QUOTE(Pliskron @ Dec 20 2010, 05:12 PM)

You know I'm willing to bet that if I went through your posts, at least 75% would be complaints about the DSTwo. Seriously, what's up with that? You whine and bitch more than pokemon fanboys when the game won't run on their cart, and that's saying something! Did your dog choke to death on a DSTwo or something? You just feel the need to express how much you dislike it multiple times a day, to everybody that's already heard it, even in threads that aren't about it.

We're all tired of it.

Yes Plisk, we get it, for like the 80th time, you dislike the DSTwo, you don't need to keep reminding us.

 

[ShadowSoldier]

You know I'm willing to bet that if I went through your posts, at least 75% would be complaints about the DSTwo. Seriously, what's up with that? You whine and bitch more than pokemon fanboys when the game won't run on their cart, and that's saying something! Did your dog choke to death on a DSTwo or something? You just feel the need to express how much you dislike it multiple times a day, to everybody that's already heard it, even in threads that aren't about it.

We're all tired of it.

Yes Plisk, we get it, for like the 80th time, you dislike the DSTwo, you don't need to keep reminding us.

You're forgetting something, he has a DSTWO and likes the Supercard team.. or so he posted before a while back.

 

[Deleted-236924]

The second of those 3 features was announced officially as "coming later": DSi-enhanced rom support. It's those games that already work on the DS but when played on a DSi those should offer additional features and enhancements. But as it turns out: nobody has got anywhere near being able to run those games in DSi mode on the CycloDS iEvolution. Our inside source tells us that the team is just hoping for hackers to find a way to make it work once the card is released, but they haven't been able to go anywhere near it.

That part pisses me off. Why would you advertise that and not be able to show it? Just come out and say "we dont have DSi enhancement yet, but we are working on it."

DS2 announced emulators, which only came out weeks (months, for the SNES emulator) after the cart was released.
CycloDSi announces DSi-enhanced games support, which will come out weeks after the cart is released.

Where's the difference?

 

[Rydian]

You're forgetting something, he has a DSTWO and likes the Supercard team.. or so he posted before a while back.

A black bear can tell me it's fur is white all it wants...

EDIT: Misjudged timings.

 

[Oveneise]

The second of those 3 features was announced officially as "coming later": DSi-enhanced rom support. It's those games that already work on the DS but when played on a DSi those should offer additional features and enhancements. But as it turns out: nobody has got anywhere near being able to run those games in DSi mode on the CycloDS iEvolution. Our inside source tells us that the team is just hoping for hackers to find a way to make it work once the card is released, but they haven't been able to go anywhere near it.

That part pisses me off. Why would you advertise that and not be able to show it? Just come out and say "we dont have DSi enhancement yet, but we are working on it."

DS2 announced emulators, which only came out weeks (months, for the SNES emulator) after the cart was released.
CycloDSi announces DSi-enhanced games support, which will come out weeks after the cart is released.

Where's the difference?

People don't want to spend $50 on a product that may see little support from the team. They want to make sure they aren't buying a piece of junk.

 

[kiafazool]

The second of those 3 features was announced officially as "coming later": DSi-enhanced rom support. It's those games that already work on the DS but when played on a DSi those should offer additional features and enhancements. But as it turns out: nobody has got anywhere near being able to run those games in DSi mode on the CycloDS iEvolution. Our inside source tells us that the team is just hoping for hackers to find a way to make it work once the card is released, but they haven't been able to go anywhere near it.
That part pisses me off. Why would you advertise that and not be able to show it? Just come out and say "we dont have DSi enhancement yet, but we are working on it."


DS2 announced emulators, which only came out weeks (months, for the SNES emulator) after the cart was released.
CycloDSi announces DSi-enhanced games support, which will come out weeks after the cart is released.

Where's the difference?

thats what i dont understand

and now to think this thread is soooo controversial
its wrong on both sides
Costello GBATemp i think shouldn't have had been so harsh on the team
and
TC should've posted all the features and things they can't accomplish right of the bat

but i dont understand what TC are trying to accomplish by saying this statement
from TC website

We hope that in future, review sites will seek clarification from us before posting unconfirmed news, to avoid confusion and to help protect the reputation of their site.

EDIT: look 2 posts below, Costello felt bad so i removed his name - sorry

 

[GH0ST]

People don't want to spend $50 on a product that may see little support from the team. They want to make sure they aren't buying a piece of junk.

Here is the list of the updates for the cycloDS since 2007 (including numerous open beta versions and many GUI improvements taken from users suggestions) :

Firmware v1.60 STABLE/Firmware vB.4 (GUI BETA)/Firmware v1.59 STABLE/Firmware vB.3 (GUI BETA)/Firmware vB.2 (GUI BETA)/Firmware vB.1 (GUI BETA)/Firmware vB.0 (GUI BETA)/Firmware v1.59 BETA 1/Firmware v1.58 STABLE/Firmware v1.58 BETA 2/Firmware v1.58 BETA 1/Firmware v1.57 STABLE/Firmware v1.57 BETA 4/Firmware v1.57 BETA 3/Firmware v1.57 BETA 2/Firmware v1.57 BETA 1/Firmware v1.56 STABLE/Firmware v1.56 BETA 7/Firmware v1.56 BETA 6/Firmware v1.56 BETA 5/Firmware v1.56 BETA 4/Firmware v1.56 BETA 3/Firmware v1.56 BETA 2/Firmware v1.56 BETA 1/Firmware v1.55 STABLE/Firmware v1.55 BETA 5/Firmware v1.55 BETA 4/Firmware v1.55 BETA 3/Firmware v1.55 BETA 2/Firmware v1.55 BETA 1/Firmware v1.54 STABLE/Firmware v1.53 STABLE/Firmware v1.51 STABLE/Firmware v1.50 STABLE/Firmware v1.41 STABLE/Firmware v1.41 BETA_1/Firmware v1.40 STABLE/Firmware v1.4 BETA_4/Firmware v1.4 BETA_3/Firmware v1.4 BETA_2/Firmware v1.4 BETA_1/Firmware v1.31 STABLE/Firmware v1.30 STABLE/Firmware v1.3 BETA_3/Firmware v1.3 BETA_2/Firmware v1.3 BETA_1/Firmware v1.22 patched/Firmware v1.22 STABLE/Firmware v1.21 STABLE/Firmware v1.20 STABLE/Firmware v1.13 STABLE/Firmware v1.12 STABLE/Firmware v1.11 STABLE/Firmware v1.10 STABLE/CycloEvoDLDI_v1.2/CycloEvoDLDI_v1.1/CycloEvoDLDI_v1.0

Stop bitchin' please !

 

[Costello]

why is everyone making this about me? if opium or shaun had posted this you would have made this about him?

i just posted what our insiders told us. i'm going to post the answer now...

 

[kiafazool]

why is everyone making this about me? if opium or shaun had posted this you would have made this about him?

i just posted what our insiders told us. i'm going to post the answer now...

what answer?

and im sorry my post was directed at you
i meant all in one