Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter - Official Trailer

Discussion in 'Books, Music, TV & Movies' started by Valwin, Feb 14, 2012.

Feb 14, 2012
  1. Valwin
    OP

    Banned Valwin The Neautral Gamer

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,084
    Location:
    Puertorico
    Country:
    United States


    Fuck yea Lincoln
     


  2. Midna

    Banned Midna Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,336
    Country:
    Albania
    I... want it.
     
  3. mysticwaterfall

    Member mysticwaterfall Streamforce Supreme Commander

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,868
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Country:
    United States
    The whole premise of this movie is too absurd not to give it a look sometime.
     
  4. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Don't be thrown off by Tim Burton's name on it, he's only "producing", which is a huge difference from "directing" since most anything he directs nowadays is utter shit.

    The director didn't do anything too spectacular in recent memory, although Wanted is probably what stands out the most. Can't vouch for it though, I never saw it. Still, it's Abraham Lincoln hunting vampires, sign me up.
     
  5. Valwin
    OP

    Banned Valwin The Neautral Gamer

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,084
    Location:
    Puertorico
    Country:
    United States

    could be another letdown like cowboy vs aliens
     
  6. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Cowboys and Aliens was great, it was just advertised poorly. While it's certainly an action movie, with a name like that, it makes it feel like some B-movie type of over-the-top action flick.

    Although I don't see how people expected something like that. Iron Man was paced in much of the same way and arguably wasn't even that action intensive. There's perhaps 3 major action scenes (the escape from the cave, the fight in the village, and the end fight against Obadiah) while most of it is given to character development. Both had the same director. It's a great film that was enjoyable and had plenty of arcs that came together and paid out in the end.
     
  7. Sicklyboy

    Global Moderator Sicklyboy Resident Mechanical Keyboard Addict

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    5,620
    Location:
    [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]
    Country:
    United States
    What the fuck... am I even watching?

    THIS LOOKS AWESOME.
     
  8. Hyro-Sama

    Member Hyro-Sama I'm from the fucking future.

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,255
    Location:
    After Earth
    Country:
    Japan
    WHAT THE FUCK.
     
  9. Valwin
    OP

    Banned Valwin The Neautral Gamer

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,084
    Location:
    Puertorico
    Country:
    United States

    it felt kind of slow to me
     
  10. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Because it decided to have plot and characters instead of a lot of modern action movies. It's something you have to see knowing it's not gonna be some instant gratification movie like Sucker Punch. People loved Drive for almost the same exact reasons and its much slower than Cowboys and Aliens. Different directors and techniques, yes, but it's still a movie that seems appropriately action but instead focuses on characterization and drama. Not that Cowboys and Aliens was a huge film on characterization, it just had a moderate enough of it to differ it from your typical summer movie schlock.
     
  11. Gahars

    Member Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,254
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Country:
    United States
    History, you've just been beaten.
     
  12. KingdomBlade

    Member KingdomBlade Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,941
    Location:
    In Vulpes' Fur
    Country:
    Philippines
    I found C vs A's plot to be unengaging; shame. It had actual potential too; and nice action scenes. It was moderately enjoyable for what it was though; just not interesting enough.

    Tim Burton not making good films? I certainly think that if you overlook some flaws, Alice was a fairly good film. Sure, the third act was kind of limping, but the first two were good. And it's gorgeous as hell. It's not so much Burton, more of the script assigned to him. And then there's Sweeny Todd, which may be one of his best films yet. Directing is strong, acting is strong, and visual style is strong. Charlie was weaker story-wise, yet utterly delightful.

    As for this movie, it looks interesting. Personally though, I'm a lot more interested for the other Lincoln film coming out this year, the Spielberg directed "Lincoln", a historical drama with Daniel Day-Lewis, which is probably the complete opposite of this film. This one seems like brainless fun; hopefully it doesn't end up disappointing. It's the director of Wanted, so I'm hoping that this will surprise me, much like, say, Pirahna or something.
     
  13. Veho
    This message by Veho has been removed from public view by a moderator, Dec 10, 2016.
    Feb 16, 2012
  14. cosmiccow

    Member cosmiccow Original Hippie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,125
    Country:
    Germany
    Uhm what the duck?

    What does Tim Burton do here? He's neither writer nor director on this. I guess I'll pass.


    And then this unnecessary tree chopping at the end?
     
  15. KingdomBlade

    Member KingdomBlade Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,941
    Location:
    In Vulpes' Fur
    Country:
    Philippines
     
  16. Veho
    This message by Veho has been removed from public view by a moderator, Dec 10, 2016.
    Feb 16, 2012
  17. cosmiccow

    Member cosmiccow Original Hippie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,125
    Country:
    Germany
    Tim Burton is just one of the producers. So how much does he actually influence this movie compared to directors and writers?

    I know who Abraham Lincoln is. I don't think a vampire story about him holds a lot of value besides the inherent absurdity.

    Yeah, maybe it's light hollywood popcorn fun.
     
  18. KingdomBlade

    Member KingdomBlade Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,941
    Location:
    In Vulpes' Fur
    Country:
    Philippines
     
  19. raulpica

    Supervisor raulpica With your drill, thrust to the sky!

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,674
    Location:
    _____________ PowerLevel: 9001
    Country:
    Italy
    Merged threads for GREAT JUSTICE
     
  20. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Good acting? It's just Johnny Depp being wacky Johnny Depp. He often falls into trends like many other actors. Take Robin Williams for example. He either plays "goofy" Robin Williams (Mrs. Doubtfire, Jumanji or however it's spelled) or "inspirational" Robin Williams (Patch Adams, Dead Poets' Society). Johnny Depp is much the same. He either plays "goofy" Johnny Depp (all his Tim Burton rolls, Pirates of the Caribbean, etc) or "serious" Johnny Depp (most recently I think he was in The Tourist?). In the end he's just told to act goofy.

    Gorgeous as hell? Strong visual style? It's the same art style. Trying to be dark enough to appeal to his demographics with a lot of white facepaint. This was the worst with Alice. You can either go for children's appeal (the Disney one) or you can go with the mature appeal (American McGee's Alice). In between is just really shitty.

    Also if you thought Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was good then that's a slap in the face to a classic. That's like praising a Michael Bay remake of the Godfather.

    When he's not busy making same-story movies, he's busy ripping material from others. Then he slaps a coat of white face paint on it, merchandises the crap out of it, and makes big bucks.

    People complain about Michael Bay movies for "appealing to the lowest common denominator" of retarded movie-goers with little care for anything outside of special effects and broken dubstep tunes but Tim Burton is exactly the same, just for a different crowd. He knows anything with his name on it will attract an emo crowd who will covet the movie for its "fantastic art style" and "wonderful interpretation of a classic tale".

    To some extent I'll enjoy a Michael Bay film over a Tim Burton one. And I saw Nightmare Before Christmas and I did not like it.
     
    1 person likes this.
  21. KingdomBlade

    Member KingdomBlade Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,941
    Location:
    In Vulpes' Fur
    Country:
    Philippines
    Every director has individual merits, and each has his/her hits and misses. For Burton's misses, there's Beetlejuice (XD), Planet of the Apes (2001), Alice (Sorta), Mars Attacks! (Bad. Just bad.), and Sleepy Hollow was a half miss. Burton's old work (those without enormous budgets and had original scripts) is by far his best. Try a couple, maybe you might like them. Even Bay had good films, there's The Rock (which I would regard as an excellent action film, perhaps one of that decade) and Transformers (I mean 1.)

    Nightmare Before Christmas, well, I saw it when I was a kid so I loved it. And when I watched it now, I still love it. It's either nostalgia or it's genuinely good. I'm going with both.
     
  22. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Comparing Marilyn Monroe and a modern male actor is like comparing apples and oranges. Marilyn Monroe played a "dumb blonde" because that's what people wanted at the times. She pioneered Playboy and was by far their most iconic model, do you really think she would be like Erin Brokovich on screen? People wanted a ditsy and attractive girl. It was the 50's after all.

    We're at a point where special effects have become level. I saw Last Airbender in theaters and yeah, it's an utterly shit movie, one of the worst I've seen, but the special effects are good. "Good", mind you. Not mindblowing, not spectacular, but "good". Almost everything nowadays with a decent budget has "good" effects or looks "pretty". Also Sucker Punch was a great movie. It was completely ridiculous but that's what made it work. I saw it twice and theaters and loved it twice. If I were to judge films as decent for being "pretty" then I guess Transformers 3 is a pretty alright film. Yeah, sure.

    Charlie was just a mockery of a movie that should have never been touched. It's a classic that Tim Burton got his grimy fat hands on and ruined with his terrible art direction and predictable cliches. If you think Johnny Depp is a suitable successor to Gene Wilder then you shouldn't even be thinking about films.

    It's been years since I've seen Edward Scissorhands and I haven't seen Ed Wood or Big Fish.
     

Share This Page