• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

A law i'd like to see come back in Quebec (or a variant of it at least)

Noctosphere

Nova's Guardian
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
6,751
Trophies
3
Age
30
Location
Biblically accurate Hell
XP
18,676
Country
Canada
This law was adopted by the liberal government led by Honoré Mercier back in late 1890's
A free land will be given to every father of at least 12 living childrens.
I'd like to see a variant to it coming back to life, and it should also be applied to the whole canada in my opinion.
25k$ of subvention for a house to parrents of at least 4 (could also apply to 3 in this case(see below)) living childrens below 18 of age.

The reason why this was first voted back then was for colonizing the region called Laurentides, which was one of the northest region to be inhabited in the province.
However, if you look at stats online, you'll see that the Canada is one of the most underpopulated country in the world.
To give you an example, usa has 330M habitants, is the 4th largest country and is A BIT underpopulated.
Canada is the 2nd largest country and has about only 31M habitants.
The province of Quebec is trice the size of France, and just the Paris city is half the population of our whole province.

So yea, i'd like to see a variant of this law applied to whole Canada to favorise its increase of population.
Do you think such law should be of interest where you live too?
 

Dark_Phoras

Master of Hounds
Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
359
Trophies
0
XP
782
Country
Portugal
I think families are better with fewer children, they get better education and more dedication from the parents. We also have the issue of overpopulation, I think it's preferable to offset population deficits in some areas with qualified immigration.
 

UltraDolphinRevolution

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
1,806
Trophies
0
XP
2,436
Country
China
Lowering tax burdens are preferable to payments. Lowering tax burdens means the state "steals" less while government payments are essentially redirecting stolen money.

At least from a libertarian (a la Ron Paul) perspective.

May I suggest Hong Kong people who do not consider themselves Chinese.
Beijing gets less resistence and the spread of Chinese culture.
HK gets more space.
Those people will feel free.
Canada will get better food.

A win-win situation.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @OctoAori20, Cool. Same here.