Let me burst your bubble.
The issue with SJWs is twofold:
- they advocate for a world, where everything edgy, critical, nasty, is basically shunned into non existance - so everyone can have a nice time, not understanding what makes people tick, ostrasizing everyone that doesnt submit to a certain norm (installing social taboos).
They are under the very problematic believe, that 'what they dont see - doesnt exist', and they will throw a hissy fit - if they are exposed to something they don't like - trying to make society dragging it away for them.
Also they will resort to social media shaming to reach their misguided goals.
As a result people become more ostracized, more divided, more separated in different bubbles, and more unable to deal with adversity. Less likely to be able to bridge ideological gaps. Less likely to deal with criticism.
Second issue -
- because society had become pretty much sufficiently liberal, for any people with large enough support groups to meet their biggest demands, SJWs, seeking out issues to champion so they could feel better about themselves, or look better on social - took up the remaining ones. The issue here is, that the groups of people that fall into those have been so 'nieche' in society overall - that promoting their rights has a larger majority scratching their heads, because they themselves - might not have had direct personal contact with an individual of such a subgroup in their lives (previous efforts of those groups to get wider social recognition failed - arguably - because their reach was so small) - yet see others drawing their self identity from creating rulesets that would apply in such a situation.
The second issue, isnt much of an issue - its just something of a disconnect, if you first come across it. The 'what the heck are you doing here' question might have been in the forefront of many peoples minds, before they recognized, it is a youth trend, so act friendly. What their internal monologue after such an interaction is, you sadly dont control. Furthermore, if it helps smaller subgroups to integrate into society better - so be it. No harm done.
The first issue is a real issue. We dont establish social taboos, just for the fun of it - and then have people play act as if the issues dont exist, if they pressure others into not talking about them.
There is a backlash against this in place that is very deserved.
On the higher education (colleges) level, people spoke out against this practice far too late, because it was a trend, that was used to empower people by adhering to a mainstream social model, while at the same time calling people that wouldnt comply to 'speech regulation' the equivalent of racists who would be committing 'though crime'. ("You cant say that.").
The thing is, that none of what they'd claim being a social standard, was a social standard yet - they had just made it up, and the majority of people didn't just agree with it. They just acted as if they did. Professors often fell in line, because they saw it better for their careers not to be called racists, and all of a sudden - you had social echo chambers at colleges you didn't want.
That stuff, has to stop.
Not talking about the stuff like emotional support animal rooms and social ranking being based on belonging to more oppressed subgroups, that developed out of the more insane part of the SJW movement.
People on video explaining those concepts better than I just did:
(value conservative angle)
edit: Exchanged the second video link for a 'better' one (same interviewee)
