ThePowerOutage said:Both.jan777 said:
Can't wait till tomorrow and part 2:
Day 4
Room Saal 3
Start time 11:30
Duration 02:15
They could patch it but it would be extremely difficult. Put it this way - it got hacked worse than the Wii if you look at the charts.dekuleon said:Bladexdsl said:lets see sony patch this!
They can?? I wonder?!
Ugh...MW2 was INFESTED with them... T-Tshaunj66 said:Just hope this doesn't mean more cheaters on PSN
It will, it will. Suckers who don't like to lose are everywhere, and with the system hacked so deeply it's only a matter of time before someone creates a Cheat System and failers start creating cheats for online for EVERY GAME OUT THERE.shaunj66 said:Just hope this doesn't mean more cheaters on PSN
shaunj66 said:Just hope this doesn't mean more cheaters on PSN
It will, but I imagine that cheats will be a lot harder to produce for the PS3 than the Wii. Even though the security system fails, the system is extremely complex.shaunj66 said:Just hope this doesn't mean more cheaters on PSN
The whole idea here is that you DON'T need to hack your PS3. With this key, you can sign your program just like it would come from Sony. This means the PS3 will accept it, no hacks required. It doesn't reject Sony code, and for ALL intents and purposes, we can now make "Sony code."jalaneme said:cool stuff but we still have to be cautious about going online with hacked ps3s though.
sony is gonna be shitting bricks when they find out about thisArgentum Vir said:I just shat bricks. By bricks I mean PS3 bricks. inb4peoplewhocan'tfollowinstructions.
What? I am quite confused by this question. If you're asking why Sony's "random" number is always the same, I'm pretty sure no one really knows. Its just Sony's stupidity. Someone asked at the end of the talk "Where does the number come from?" and their response was "We're quite sure, but we think the southern hemisphere"Rydian said:I understand substitute functions to return values when the correct one isn't functional, but shouldn't generating a random value always be functional unless your system is to the point that you're not going to be coding anything at all?
ThePowerOutage said:Both.jan777 said:
Can't wait till tomorrow and part 2:
Day 4
Room Saal 3
Start time 11:30
Duration 02:15
ganons said:What's the topic? Or is it continuation of ps3?
SifJar said:What? I am quite confused by this question. If you're asking why Sony's "random" number is always the same, I'm pretty sure no one really knows. Its just Sony's stupidity. Someone asked at the end of the talk "Where does the number come from?" and their response was "We're quite sure, but we think the southern hemisphere"Rydian said:I understand substitute functions to return values when the correct one isn't functional, but shouldn't generating a random value always be functional unless your system is to the point that you're not going to be coding anything at all?