Gaming So Pokemon HG/SS Got a 37/40 in Famitsu

Status
Not open for further replies.

Esh

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
36
Trophies
0
Age
37
XP
100
Country
United States
People need to stop buying pokemon games so it actually forces nintendo to do something innovative.

Tired of their re-making ways.

WTB new innovative title from nintendo!
 

granville

GBAtemp Goat
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
5,102
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
Orlando, Florida
XP
3,091
Country
United States
The thing about Pokemon is that it is fun. All the games are fun and I play them. No shame either. But you can't deny the changes are so negligible, that very little work goes into creating a new game in the series.

The Final Fantasy argument is completely false. Pretty much every single game in the series is completely different from the other in core gameplay. I can't think of a more ridiculous statement than comparing Pokemon to FF. Every game or two, they fundamentally change the entire gameplay system. FF3 had the job system. FF4 was the first to have real character development and the ATB battles. FF6 expanded the character development as well as reinvented the job system with espers. FF7 brought the series to an entirely different modern style, melding real world with fantasy. So on, so forth. And the Golden Sun bash is equally ridiculous due simply to the fact that there have only been 2 released games in the series and not remakes.

Esh pretty much summed it up. If you are unhappy with the way a series is, simply use common sense and stop buying them. Even if your single act doesn't do anything, you will at least saved yourself the money from having to play the game.

And in regards to remakes, for me it's either, 1- having the ability to play it on a system (assuming I don't have access to the original one), or 2- just seeing how much has improved since the original. I'm not one of the crowd who wants remakes, but I will play them if they are there and will get excited for them. It's better than having to live through Imagine games.
 

psycoblaster

Divine
Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
2,131
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Seoul.. (in Korea)
Website
Visit site
XP
211
Country
PharaohsVizier said:
Njrg said:
Zerrix said:
psycoblaster said:
thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated

Yes and you can judge this because you have played the Remakes months ago, right?
That was a ridiculous post. How can you judge about a game that you haven't ever played. ?!
He played it before...

Remember? It was called Platinum.

Oh wait! It was Diamond.

Or it could of been Pearl.

Well call it what you want, he definitely played it before if he thinks its overrated.

I don't understand why the hate for Pokemon games.... Seriously Pokemon haters really need to STOP and THINK about what they are saying. Okay, now to explain my logic. Pokemon games have innovated quite a bit over the years, albeit the core game remains the same. The story changes, the graphics definitely get an upgrade, the only thing that remains the same is the gameplay. Okay now let's look at another series... Say Final Fantasy, let's start with the first few, all turn based, practically the same game, world map, yea it gets a story change, updated graphics, but hell ITS THE SAME GAME. LETS ALL GO BASH THE FIRST FEW FINAL FANTASY GAMES! Not a good enough example for you? Howabout Harvest Moon, Warcraft, Super Mario Brothers, hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
First of all, my post was basically a joke because #1: most famitsu scores are biased and #2: i wanted to see how much pokefans stayed loyal to the pokemons.

But apart from that, I can't really agree about your thoughts about final fantasy, maybe because you haven't played all of its series. It's true that I didn't play all of them either, but I sure did play all of the DS, PSX, and the SNES final fantasies. (Too bad I couldn't buy a PS2)
Yeah, new story, updated graphics, but the same bahamut, the same fira and cura, the same old save the world, and the same chocobo - what the hell. But at least I like the innovations in the whole system.
all turn based
The older ones were turn based - the newer ones got a system called ATB, which is different when comparing it with an ordinary turn based game. Yeah, even if the earliest games using ATB still felt the same way as turn based, they really put it into great use later, which can especially be seen on the FF4 remake for the DS.
practically the same game
Hmm... yeah well it is practically a series
but hell ITS THE SAME GAME
with a somewhat different gameplay/battle at least. Materia for FF7, Junction for FF8, Job based skills in the older games and FF9, Sphere Grid/Licence Board which helps you "build your own characters", and especially the gambit system in FFXII which makes controlling multiple characters easier. Differing from pokemon, these are systems which makes each and every final fantasies unique gameplay-wise.
This is somewhat incomparable to the same PP/turn based system in pokemon which has NEVER changed throughout the years.
Warcraft
Can't agree to this. You know that from war 2 -> war 3 really changed the game a lot gameplay wise, so this is pretty much wrong.
Super Mario Brothers
Yo SMB is a classic...
hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
Probably because of the mass advertising
 

aaronrandall

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1
Trophies
0
XP
3
Country
United States
psycoblaster said:
PharaohsVizier said:
Njrg said:
Zerrix said:
psycoblaster said:
thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated

Yes and you can judge this because you have played the Remakes months ago, right?
That was a ridiculous post. How can you judge about a game that you haven't ever played. ?!
He played it before...

Remember? It was called Platinum.

Oh wait! It was Diamond.

Or it could of been Pearl.

Well call it what you want, he definitely played it before if he thinks its overrated.

I don't understand why the hate for Pokemon games.... Seriously Pokemon haters really need to STOP and THINK about what they are saying. Okay, now to explain my logic. Pokemon games have innovated quite a bit over the years, albeit the core game remains the same. The story changes, the graphics definitely get an upgrade, the only thing that remains the same is the gameplay. Okay now let's look at another series... Say Final Fantasy, let's start with the first few, all turn based, practically the same game, world map, yea it gets a story change, updated graphics, but hell ITS THE SAME GAME. LETS ALL GO BASH THE FIRST FEW FINAL FANTASY GAMES! Not a good enough example for you? Howabout Harvest Moon, Warcraft, Super Mario Brothers, hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
First of all, my post was basically a joke because #1: most famitsu scores are biased and #2: i wanted to see how much pokefans stayed loyal to the pokemons.

But apart from that, I can't really agree about your thoughts about final fantasy, maybe because you haven't played all of its series. It's true that I didn't play all of them either, but I sure did play all of the DS, PSX, and the SNES final fantasies. (Too bad I couldn't buy a PS2)
Yeah, new story, updated graphics, but the same bahamut, the same fira and cura, the same old save the world, and the same chocobo - what the hell. But at least I like the innovations in the whole system.
all turn based
The older ones were turn based - the newer ones got a system called ATB, which is different when comparing it with an ordinary turn based game. Yeah, even if the earliest games using ATB still felt the same way as turn based, they really put it into great use later, which can especially be seen on the FF4 remake for the DS.
practically the same game
Hmm... yeah well it is practically a series
but hell ITS THE SAME GAME
with a somewhat different gameplay/battle at least. Materia for FF7, Junction for FF8, Job based skills in the older games and FF9, Sphere Grid/Licence Board which helps you "build your own characters", and especially the gambit system in FFXII which makes controlling multiple characters easier. Differing from pokemon, these are systems which makes each and every final fantasies unique gameplay-wise.
This is somewhat incomparable to the same PP/turn based system in pokemon which has NEVER changed throughout the years.
Warcraft
Can't agree to this. You know that from war 2 -> war 3 really changed the game a lot gameplay wise, so this is pretty much wrong.
Super Mario Brothers
Yo SMB is a classic...
hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
Probably because of the mass advertising


Lol whoa whoa there. I am both a pokemon fan and a final fantasy fan, But I'd have to say, you implying that all the final fantasies are "practically" the same game, is utterly ridiculous. All the pokemon games are extremely similar, far more similar then the final fantasies are too eachother

and yes of course there gonna keep chocobos, aeons, and spells, if they changed those, it would'nt be final fantasy
sleep.gif


But im not here saying pokemon is all the same, I personally am more excited for these remakes then I have been for a game in a long time.

but in the end

they're all fun games

people bash them because there popular franchises

if they were some underground indie series that wasn't so vastly popular, no one would complain about it. People just feel the need to "go against the system" etc.
 

.Darky

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
1,320
Trophies
1
XP
1,016
Country
Peru
And yet, this becomes another Pokemon love/hate thread.
dry.gif


On-Topic: Seriously, can they give a proper review when the game has not been released yet?
 

JoyConG

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
507
Trophies
0
XP
267
Country
United States
.Darky said:
And yet, this becomes another Pokemon love/hate thread.
dry.gif


On-Topic: Seriously, can they give a proper review when the game has not been released yet?
Early copies.. Typical from Japanese Retail, leads us to early leeks too.
 
D

Deleted_171835

Guest
Famitsu is always biased. I never trust their reviews. To the above poster, review sites commonly get games early.
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
PharaohsVizier said:
I think you guys are not getting the sarcasm part of my post... I would never dream of saying Final Fantasy is the same altogether, I just find it funny that people can rush to the defense of Final Fantasy but not Pokemon. There are similarities between Final Fantasy games just like there are parallels in Pokemon games. TA DA, get the point of my post yet?

Very sneaky, sis.

It is funny that Final Fantasy kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I don't know, 6 games? Pokemon has had the same battle system for a total of 4 different games (not counting different versions), 5 with HG/SS. The difference is that Pokemon is a "kiddie" game so obviously it needs bashing.

Although 90% of the fuckbags who post hatemail here are probably just dumb trolls trying to start a fire.
 

psycoblaster

Divine
Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
2,131
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Seoul.. (in Korea)
Website
Visit site
XP
211
Country
Guild McCommunist said:
PharaohsVizier said:
I think you guys are not getting the sarcasm part of my post... I would never dream of saying Final Fantasy is the same altogether, I just find it funny that people can rush to the defense of Final Fantasy but not Pokemon. There are similarities between Final Fantasy games just like there are parallels in Pokemon games. TA DA, get the point of my post yet?

Very sneaky, sis.

It is funny that Final Fantasy kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I don't know, 6 games? Pokemon has had the same battle system for a total of 4 different games (not counting different versions), 5 with HG/SS. The difference is that Pokemon is a "kiddie" game so obviously it needs bashing.

Although 90% of the fuckbags who post hatemail here are probably just dumb trolls trying to start a fire.
Now here is a big point-
You are admitting that pokemon has had the same battle system from its start to now.
But you are still saying that final fantasy has changed its gameplay formula after 6 games.
That's the big point that I'm trying to say :\
 

JDandy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
299
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
84
Country
Netherlands
Guild McCommunist said:
Very sneaky, sis.

It is funny that Final Fantasy kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I don't know, 6 games? Pokemon has had the same battle system for a total of 4 different games (not counting different versions), 5 with HG/SS. The difference is that Pokemon is a "kiddie" game so obviously it needs bashing.

Although 90% of the fuckbags who post hatemail here are probably just dumb trolls trying to start a fire.

[5 different games]. I see that you are implying that HG/SS, remakes of G/S count as a different game from G/S, while at the same time not implying that FR/LG are different from R/B/G. The lapse in logic here is mildly offensive.

Technically, FF kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I just know, 1 through 10-2, not counting the miriad of ports and remakes. FF13 will be added to that list of course. It's the same deal as with pokeymons. Core gameplay (ie. turnbased exp/gold grindan) remains while a new gimmick is added (jobs, materia, junctions, dress sphere) and graphics are upgraded. Difference is that FF evolved (oh so fucking slightly) more than Pokemon.

To be honest, FF deserves to be spat upon for still using turn-based combat in a day and age where technology permits so much more, forcing all the lesser competitors/copycats to do the same, effectively locking the JRPG genre in a quagmire of turn-based bullshit from 1995.

Pokemon on the other hand, doesn't deserve to be spat upon. That doesn't take away the fact that it never innovates itself other than adding increasingly bland creatures each generation when Nintendo runs out of games to remake. The simple story and child-friendly setting, while not to my personal taste, are a product of the main target audience of the series; children.

They both need bashing. Deserve it, even. A little truth-facing as to what is stale and stanky in the major franchises of videogaming. Pokemon is just the one that's relevant to this thread, before it got derailed so sweetly.
rolleyes.gif
 

KazoWAR

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
1,952
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
Winter Haven
XP
2,130
Country
United States
Dwight said:
Njrg said:
Dwight said:
psycoblaster said:
thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Hey bro have you played it yet?
Yeah I didn't think so.
Hey bro have you played a pokemon game before?
Its all the same remade-crap from what was a good game in 1998.

Call it Pokemon emerald, Diamond, platinum, gold, whatever precious metal or stone you can think of, its all THE SAME GAME. Even the BGM's have remained the same basic themes after 12 years.

Pokemon has been remade to crap nearly 15 times.

Its worst than Megaman. Atleast with megaman you get neat weapons and catchy background music.
Pokemon usually has some pretty radical changes. The only generation that had the least amount of contributions was R/S/E. By your logic, you could say the same thing about Final Fantasy, or even Zelda. My point is that you shouldn't say that a game is overrated before you've actually played it. G/S/C was my (and many other peoples) favorite generation and I am very excited to see it remade with all the new features that were added in D/P/P.

Are you kidding? R/S/E introduced Abilities, Natures and EVs, all of which are very important factors in the competitive side of the game.
 

Rock Raiyu

Clock Up
OP
Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
5,066
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Walking the path of heaven
XP
2,359
Country
United States
KazoWAR said:
Dwight said:
Njrg said:
Dwight said:
psycoblaster said:
thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Hey bro have you played it yet?
Yeah I didn't think so.
Hey bro have you played a pokemon game before?
Its all the same remade-crap from what was a good game in 1998.

Call it Pokemon emerald, Diamond, platinum, gold, whatever precious metal or stone you can think of, its all THE SAME GAME. Even the BGM's have remained the same basic themes after 12 years.

Pokemon has been remade to crap nearly 15 times.

Its worst than Megaman. Atleast with megaman you get neat weapons and catchy background music.
Pokemon usually has some pretty radical changes. The only generation that had the least amount of contributions was R/S/E. By your logic, you could say the same thing about Final Fantasy, or even Zelda. My point is that you shouldn't say that a game is overrated before you've actually played it. G/S/C was my (and many other peoples) favorite generation and I am very excited to see it remade with all the new features that were added in D/P/P.

Are you kidding? R/S/E introduced Abilities, Natures and EVs, all of which are very important factors in the competitive side of the game.
Still sucks. Everything went down hill after 2nd Generation in my opinion.
 

freshness

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
55
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
NRW
XP
119
Country
Gambia, The
i´m not a hater..but the last pokemon game i played before i tried platinum was gold, and gold was fucking awesome and a huge improvement compared to the classics..so i was a little disappointed that they use the same fucking oldstyle battle system after ten years..still only 4 attacks, no cool specials, or something like that (the double fights don´t count)...i don´t know but the battle system needs a complete new facelift or the pokemon series needs a good spinoff with more interesting fights...thats my opinion and the only reason why i don´t like pokemon games anymore...but they still kick ass....
 

Terenigma

Terenigma everywhere
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,624
Trophies
0
Location
Earth
XP
712
Country
isabelyes said:
no matter how many times they release the same game over and over again, there, frankly,
is no denying the depth (and awesomness) of this game

^ I Agree Entirely
 

War

Take it easy~
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
5,408
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
California
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
1,999
Country
Guild McCommunist said:
Wuschmaster said:
Famitsu ratings suck and don't mean shit.
They even gave Pokemon Battle Revolution a 35/40...
Famitsu does have some shitty ratings. I mean, yet again, this is coming from the eyes of your average American (no pun intended), not some Japanese cosplayer in Shibuya. I mean, they gave Nintendogs a 40/40, they gave Wind Waker a 40/40 (which while good, is no where near as good as Twilight Princess), and they gave Phantom Hourglass a 39/40 (which was basically Zelda with not-nearly-as-good-as-D-Pad controls, a shitty storyline, and the fucking Temple thing you have to go through 4,000 times). I mean, out of their top 10 games of all time, 8 out of the 10 were RPG's, 4 of them were Final Fantasy games, 3 of them were Dragon Quest games, and Ocarina of Time only squeaked in at 10th place. Thanks, Wikipedia.
Whoa whoa whoa, what? Wind Waker was better than Twilight Princess in almost every way.
 

Rock Raiyu

Clock Up
OP
Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
5,066
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Walking the path of heaven
XP
2,359
Country
United States
War said:
Guild McCommunist said:
Wuschmaster said:
Famitsu ratings suck and don't mean shit.
They even gave Pokemon Battle Revolution a 35/40...
Famitsu does have some shitty ratings. I mean, yet again, this is coming from the eyes of your average American (no pun intended), not some Japanese cosplayer in Shibuya. I mean, they gave Nintendogs a 40/40, they gave Wind Waker a 40/40 (which while good, is no where near as good as Twilight Princess), and they gave Phantom Hourglass a 39/40 (which was basically Zelda with not-nearly-as-good-as-D-Pad controls, a shitty storyline, and the fucking Temple thing you have to go through 4,000 times). I mean, out of their top 10 games of all time, 8 out of the 10 were RPG's, 4 of them were Final Fantasy games, 3 of them were Dragon Quest games, and Ocarina of Time only squeaked in at 10th place. Thanks, Wikipedia.
Whoa whoa whoa, what? Wind Waker was better than Twilight Princess in almost every way.
Respective opinion War. He may say its good and better doesn't necessarily mean that it goes for everyone.
 

pokefloote

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
2,669
Trophies
2
XP
1,991
Country
United States
I thought the games just don't feel the same after G/S/C...
I still appreciate the later generations, I just wish they weren't so... bland?

I hope these games set the path for future games.
 

Giga_Gaia

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
1,429
Trophies
1
Age
38
XP
1,226
Country
Canada
The bets are open on when it's gonna leak, wednesday, thursday or friday? Make a bet guys
tongue.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    BigOnYa @ BigOnYa: Sounds good actually.