First of all, my post was basically a joke because #1: most famitsu scores are biased and #2: i wanted to see how much pokefans stayed loyal to the pokemons.PharaohsVizier said:Njrg said:He played it before...Zerrix said:psycoblaster said:thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Yes and you can judge this because you have played the Remakes months ago, right?
That was a ridiculous post. How can you judge about a game that you haven't ever played. ?!
Remember? It was called Platinum.
Oh wait! It was Diamond.
Or it could of been Pearl.
Well call it what you want, he definitely played it before if he thinks its overrated.
I don't understand why the hate for Pokemon games.... Seriously Pokemon haters really need to STOP and THINK about what they are saying. Okay, now to explain my logic. Pokemon games have innovated quite a bit over the years, albeit the core game remains the same. The story changes, the graphics definitely get an upgrade, the only thing that remains the same is the gameplay. Okay now let's look at another series... Say Final Fantasy, let's start with the first few, all turn based, practically the same game, world map, yea it gets a story change, updated graphics, but hell ITS THE SAME GAME. LETS ALL GO BASH THE FIRST FEW FINAL FANTASY GAMES! Not a good enough example for you? Howabout Harvest Moon, Warcraft, Super Mario Brothers, hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
psycoblaster said:First of all, my post was basically a joke because #1: most famitsu scores are biased and #2: i wanted to see how much pokefans stayed loyal to the pokemons.PharaohsVizier said:Njrg said:He played it before...Zerrix said:psycoblaster said:thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Yes and you can judge this because you have played the Remakes months ago, right?
That was a ridiculous post. How can you judge about a game that you haven't ever played. ?!
Remember? It was called Platinum.
Oh wait! It was Diamond.
Or it could of been Pearl.
Well call it what you want, he definitely played it before if he thinks its overrated.
I don't understand why the hate for Pokemon games.... Seriously Pokemon haters really need to STOP and THINK about what they are saying. Okay, now to explain my logic. Pokemon games have innovated quite a bit over the years, albeit the core game remains the same. The story changes, the graphics definitely get an upgrade, the only thing that remains the same is the gameplay. Okay now let's look at another series... Say Final Fantasy, let's start with the first few, all turn based, practically the same game, world map, yea it gets a story change, updated graphics, but hell ITS THE SAME GAME. LETS ALL GO BASH THE FIRST FEW FINAL FANTASY GAMES! Not a good enough example for you? Howabout Harvest Moon, Warcraft, Super Mario Brothers, hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
But apart from that, I can't really agree about your thoughts about final fantasy, maybe because you haven't played all of its series. It's true that I didn't play all of them either, but I sure did play all of the DS, PSX, and the SNES final fantasies. (Too bad I couldn't buy a PS2)
Yeah, new story, updated graphics, but the same bahamut, the same fira and cura, the same old save the world, and the same chocobo - what the hell. But at least I like the innovations in the whole system.
all turn based
The older ones were turn based - the newer ones got a system called ATB, which is different when comparing it with an ordinary turn based game. Yeah, even if the earliest games using ATB still felt the same way as turn based, they really put it into great use later, which can especially be seen on the FF4 remake for the DS.
practically the same game
Hmm... yeah well it is practically a series
but hell ITS THE SAME GAME
with a somewhat different gameplay/battle at least. Materia for FF7, Junction for FF8, Job based skills in the older games and FF9, Sphere Grid/Licence Board which helps you "build your own characters", and especially the gambit system in FFXII which makes controlling multiple characters easier. Differing from pokemon, these are systems which makes each and every final fantasies unique gameplay-wise.
This is somewhat incomparable to the same PP/turn based system in pokemon which has NEVER changed throughout the years.
Warcraft
Can't agree to this. You know that from war 2 -> war 3 really changed the game a lot gameplay wise, so this is pretty much wrong.
Super Mario Brothers
Yo SMB is a classic...
hell practically ANY franchise keeps the core game the same and updates around it. Why the hell is Pokemon the only one that gets bashed repeatedly for this?
Probably because of the mass advertising
Early copies.. Typical from Japanese Retail, leads us to early leeks too..Darky said:And yet, this becomes another Pokemon love/hate thread.
On-Topic: Seriously, can they give a proper review when the game has not been released yet?
PharaohsVizier said:I think you guys are not getting the sarcasm part of my post... I would never dream of saying Final Fantasy is the same altogether, I just find it funny that people can rush to the defense of Final Fantasy but not Pokemon. There are similarities between Final Fantasy games just like there are parallels in Pokemon games. TA DA, get the point of my post yet?
Now here is a big point-Guild McCommunist said:PharaohsVizier said:I think you guys are not getting the sarcasm part of my post... I would never dream of saying Final Fantasy is the same altogether, I just find it funny that people can rush to the defense of Final Fantasy but not Pokemon. There are similarities between Final Fantasy games just like there are parallels in Pokemon games. TA DA, get the point of my post yet?
Very sneaky, sis.
It is funny that Final Fantasy kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I don't know, 6 games? Pokemon has had the same battle system for a total of 4 different games (not counting different versions), 5 with HG/SS. The difference is that Pokemon is a "kiddie" game so obviously it needs bashing.
Although 90% of the fuckbags who post hatemail here are probably just dumb trolls trying to start a fire.
Guild McCommunist said:Very sneaky, sis.
It is funny that Final Fantasy kept the same gameplay formula for, oh I don't know, 6 games? Pokemon has had the same battle system for a total of 4 different games (not counting different versions), 5 with HG/SS. The difference is that Pokemon is a "kiddie" game so obviously it needs bashing.
Although 90% of the fuckbags who post hatemail here are probably just dumb trolls trying to start a fire.
Dwight said:Pokemon usually has some pretty radical changes. The only generation that had the least amount of contributions was R/S/E. By your logic, you could say the same thing about Final Fantasy, or even Zelda. My point is that you shouldn't say that a game is overrated before you've actually played it. G/S/C was my (and many other peoples) favorite generation and I am very excited to see it remade with all the new features that were added in D/P/P.Njrg said:Hey bro have you played a pokemon game before?Dwight said:Hey bro have you played it yet?psycoblaster said:thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Yeah I didn't think so.
Its all the same remade-crap from what was a good game in 1998.
Call it Pokemon emerald, Diamond, platinum, gold, whatever precious metal or stone you can think of, its all THE SAME GAME. Even the BGM's have remained the same basic themes after 12 years.
Pokemon has been remade to crap nearly 15 times.
Its worst than Megaman. Atleast with megaman you get neat weapons and catchy background music.
Still sucks. Everything went down hill after 2nd Generation in my opinion.KazoWAR said:Dwight said:Pokemon usually has some pretty radical changes. The only generation that had the least amount of contributions was R/S/E. By your logic, you could say the same thing about Final Fantasy, or even Zelda. My point is that you shouldn't say that a game is overrated before you've actually played it. G/S/C was my (and many other peoples) favorite generation and I am very excited to see it remade with all the new features that were added in D/P/P.Njrg said:Hey bro have you played a pokemon game before?Dwight said:Hey bro have you played it yet?psycoblaster said:thoughts: overrated
comments: overrated
concerns: overrated
Yeah I didn't think so.
Its all the same remade-crap from what was a good game in 1998.
Call it Pokemon emerald, Diamond, platinum, gold, whatever precious metal or stone you can think of, its all THE SAME GAME. Even the BGM's have remained the same basic themes after 12 years.
Pokemon has been remade to crap nearly 15 times.
Its worst than Megaman. Atleast with megaman you get neat weapons and catchy background music.
Are you kidding? R/S/E introduced Abilities, Natures and EVs, all of which are very important factors in the competitive side of the game.
isabelyes said:no matter how many times they release the same game over and over again, there, frankly,
is no denying the depth (and awesomness) of this game
Whoa whoa whoa, what? Wind Waker was better than Twilight Princess in almost every way.Guild McCommunist said:Famitsu does have some shitty ratings. I mean, yet again, this is coming from the eyes of your average American (no pun intended), not some Japanese cosplayer in Shibuya. I mean, they gave Nintendogs a 40/40, they gave Wind Waker a 40/40 (which while good, is no where near as good as Twilight Princess), and they gave Phantom Hourglass a 39/40 (which was basically Zelda with not-nearly-as-good-as-D-Pad controls, a shitty storyline, and the fucking Temple thing you have to go through 4,000 times). I mean, out of their top 10 games of all time, 8 out of the 10 were RPG's, 4 of them were Final Fantasy games, 3 of them were Dragon Quest games, and Ocarina of Time only squeaked in at 10th place. Thanks, Wikipedia.Wuschmaster said:Famitsu ratings suck and don't mean shit.
They even gave Pokemon Battle Revolution a 35/40...
Respective opinion War. He may say its good and better doesn't necessarily mean that it goes for everyone.War said:Whoa whoa whoa, what? Wind Waker was better than Twilight Princess in almost every way.Guild McCommunist said:Famitsu does have some shitty ratings. I mean, yet again, this is coming from the eyes of your average American (no pun intended), not some Japanese cosplayer in Shibuya. I mean, they gave Nintendogs a 40/40, they gave Wind Waker a 40/40 (which while good, is no where near as good as Twilight Princess), and they gave Phantom Hourglass a 39/40 (which was basically Zelda with not-nearly-as-good-as-D-Pad controls, a shitty storyline, and the fucking Temple thing you have to go through 4,000 times). I mean, out of their top 10 games of all time, 8 out of the 10 were RPG's, 4 of them were Final Fantasy games, 3 of them were Dragon Quest games, and Ocarina of Time only squeaked in at 10th place. Thanks, Wikipedia.Wuschmaster said:Famitsu ratings suck and don't mean shit.
They even gave Pokemon Battle Revolution a 35/40...