Switch 2 modding status is closed for now.
I'm not the one out asking questions, I'm patiently waiting and probably will be for years moreJust ask the same question a million more times, and eventually you’ll hear the answer you want.
YES, it’s going really well—June 15 is the day you shall have it all
is this referring to what i think it is????Just ask the same question a million more times, and eventually you’ll hear the answer you want.
YES, it’s going really well—June 15 is the day you shall have it all
It’s mostly a meaningless statement, but people still like hearing it because it gives them some level of happiness.is this referring to what i think it is????
BroIt’s mostly a meaningless statement, but people still like hearing it because it gives them some level of happiness.






Soon™It’s mostly a meaningless statement, but people still like hearing it because it gives them some level of happiness.
Though I don't think this will give you any chance at running CFW.Changes in and surrounding page table logic:
- KPageTableBase::LockForMapDeviceAddressSpace now checks for a new KPageTableBase boolean, m_allowed_exec_device_mapping, and decides between KMemoryPermission_None and KMemoryPermission_UserExecute for the permission mask value if the boolean is, respectively, set or not.
- This prevents mapping any executable memory as device memory.
Physical RAM page
│
├──▶ Virtual mapping A [r-x]/[--x] < executable, not writable (normal user mapping)
│
└──▶ Virtual mapping B [rw-] < writable device mapping --- BUG, shouldn't be allowed when there is already executable mapping used tor the same page
If I am understanding your statement right, it would enable someone to dump out parts of memory, given that the process has access to that part of memory. (hence the whole depends on the process. it could be something pretty useless, or something that is more useful. Otherwise needing another bug to potentially read some other parts of memory that is outside of the process.)How useful it is I have no idea. I guess it depends on which process is making this possible.
... Don't get why you are trying to start a fight.nintendo will block the hackers even if it takes until theres no support being given so why not wait until then? I know hackers will spam the laugh emoji or say "shut up asskisser we do it because we can!"

Do people even know what normal sales figures are for games are? It's like if stuff doesn't sell 10s of millions, it's not selling. People expect too muchMods will come when sales decrease.
At the moment there are two interesting games (DK and Mario Kart). And lets be honest. Those are not really system sellers (as sales figures show currently). So that there is no mod chip or exploit at the moment is not really bothering me as long as there is no new zelda or mario system seller out there.
If sales were OK, Nintendo would not have lowered production and increased prices this week.Do people even know what normal sales figures are for games are? It's like if stuff doesn't sell 10s of millions, it's not selling. People expect too much

Nintendo is lowering production because they overproduced. There were lower than expected sales during the holidays, a 2 month period, and only in the US, the only region in the world with a declining economy because of some lunatic in charge.It has still sold more units than the ps5 within the same launch period, when comparing to ps5 first year, and also PS4 first year, and that's in 9 months of the switch 2.If sales were OK, Nintendo would not have lowered production and increased prices this week.
Not even that.Nintendo is lowering production because they overproduced. There were lower than expected sales during the holidays, a 2 month period, and only in the US, the only region in the world with a declining economy because of some lunatic in charge.It has still sold more units than the ps5 within the same launch period, when comparing to ps5 first year, and also PS4 first year, and that's in 9 months of the switch 2.
Post automatically merged:
The switch 2 had currently matched the switch 1 first year sales, even without the "console sellers" you are so focused on
Nintendo didn't increase prices.If sales were OK, Nintendo would not have lowered production and increased prices this week.