No it wasn't. They baselessly speculated that the vaccine caused a suicide. In the absence of evidence, that's no better than a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
You can investigate a connection, but it's irrational to suspect a connection in the absence of evidence.
It only provided baseless claims.
The article suggests the vaccines may have caused a suicide, but as I've already said, this is unsubstantiated garbage.
Yes it was.
Limited contextual and observational evidence of psychosis was the same evidence to support febrile delirium. The keyword is "suspected" and the word was selected intentionally. "Connection" also was selected intentionally as to not infer direct cause.
Yep, that's a world wide trend. Flu cases have gone down rapidly since the pandemic. Considering this it's probably not a bad idea to keep precautions when we reach endemic and beyond.
Lack of evidence for one thing is not evidence for another thing. Using words like "suspected" doesn't make a claim any less baseless, irresponsible, or idiotic.
Regardless of what happens to mask-wearing, etc., I hope some things never go back to normal. For example, I never want to shake hands ever again. It was always a stupid and unhygienic custom.
Maybe plastic dividers where they make sense, but I doubt much is going to change even among the people that care, outside something like covid.
Lol I mean, it happens, but not enough for me to get mad/frustrated about it. Maybe you prefer the fist bump, elbow bump or even the foot shake?
I was responding to what you said, weirdo, not what the paper said. Please keep up.
There was no evidence provided that it was febrile delirium, let alone that it could have been febrile delirium.
Asking this question is fine, but paper didn't stop here. It suggested it may have been caused by the vaccine, but it did so without evidence that this happened or was even possible.
Quote it.
"Limited contextual and observational evidence of psychosis was the same evidence to support febrile delirium" means "limited evidence for psychosis is evidence for an alternative explanation." If you meant something else, then you need to do a better job constructing your posts.
~90% of the thousands of Americans dying daily of COVID-19 are unvaccinated, so it's pretty easy to tell where the stupidity lies.
And my point was that it's clear who's right and who's wrong. These are scientifically quantifiable facts we are dealing with, and it would be a mistake to suggest both sides are equally correct or equally wrong. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but they don't have a right to their own facts.
I've already used up my forum patience for the month so am a bit more curt than usual.
I'm well aware of the replication crisis in science. The good news is, with the publicity that COVID-19 has, there is no replication crisis when it comes to repeating experiments relating to COVID-19, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, etc.
2+2=4 period.
You're behind the times. It's actually our blood that is superior to yours and this includes the majority of black people refusing the vaccine. I unapologetically and proudly stand with BLM and my fellow black Purebloods on this particular issue.
