Leave it be natural selection will deal with him eventually.Check your math.
Leave it be natural selection will deal with him eventually.Check your math.
The problem is his choices are unlikely to affect only himself.Leave it be natural selection will deal with him eventually.
Congress did override one of Trumps vetos - for the first time ever, getting this years military budget on track. Trump wanted to stall to retaliate against social media company influence. He wanted them to lose liability protection.I don't want to come off as flustered, so I'll just say to come back when you have a specific and verifiable instance of left-wing bias on Wikipedia..
Respectfully, what does this have to do with anything we were discussing?Congress did override one of Trumps vetos - for the first time ever, getting this years military budget on track. Trump wanted to stall to retaliate against social media company influence. He wanted them to lose liability protection.
Happy?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...-veto-first-time-major-military-bill-n1252652
To understand that fully, the entire business model of social media companies rests on liability protection. They 'have to' protect themselves from legal risk to be able to onboard millions of users on 'free' (ad financed) business models. From that results their 'take it or leave it' nature and 'no base tier', no 'mandatory privacy protection options', ...
He was a threat, you dont like him in silicon valley cycles.Respectfully, what does this have to do with anything we were discussing?
People, you should decide for yourself if the vaccine is right for you when it becomes available. Only you should decide if it is worth the risk taking the vaccine or taking the risk of the virus itself.
You should not let the vaccine pushers force you to take the vaccine. Again you need to decide if it is worth it or not.
Nobody should be forced by law to get vaccinated, but that doesn't mean a person should be free of repercussions when choosing not to be vaccinated. For example, if a person wants to travel on an airplane, they might need to be vaccinated. There are also the obvious repercussions of one's moral conscience, considering it's pretty petulant for someone to willingly not he vaccinated when medically able to do so.People, you should decide for yourself if the vaccine is right for you when it becomes available. Only you should decide if it is worth the risk taking the vaccine or taking the risk of the virus itself.
You should not let the vaccine pushers force you to take the vaccine. Again you need to decide if it is worth it or not.
On that note, you should keep in mind that there are reasons why FDA has not approve the vaccine. Despite some people on here saying that evidence is saying that it is safe. Yes, be that it may, it does not include possible new future evidence that may or may not crop up in the future. Time will tell.
Happy new year to all.
Emergency use authorization is not the same as approval and does not have the same quality control and evidence based medicine requirementsI however think people that refuse to take this vaccine should be pentalized somehow. Getting some of their basic freedoms imped since COVID-19 is a deadly virus. Proven over and over again to be able to kill young as well as old
Also @x65943 isn't it FDA approved? Since it's being distributed in the US therefore in fact it's approved right? Even when they say "emergency".
I guess it takes a lot of time to approve a medicine?Emergency use authorization is not the same as approval and does not have the same quality control and evidence based medicine requirements
If we were not in the middle of a pandemic the vaccines would have never been approved for any use whatsoever so soon
The fact remains that we are taking a calculated risk here
Right, typically they want at least a few years so they can monitor long term side effects and efficacy in different populationsI guess it takes a lot of time to approve a medicine?
Everything you said is technically correct, but emergency use authorization is not to say the safety tests weren't rigorous. As I said in the past, emergency use authorization has less to do with whether or not we know the vaccine is safe and more to do with bureaucratic technicalities. Plenty of countries, particularly in Europe, have approved the vaccine without needing to do it through emergency use.Emergency use authorization is not the same as approval and does not have the same quality control and evidence based medicine requirements
If we were not in the middle of a pandemic the vaccines would have never been approved for any use whatsoever so soon
The fact remains that we are taking a calculated risk here
The FDA has not approve the vacine, I posted a link on this post. As for the penalty, yes, after the vaccine is approve from the FDA, not before.I however think people that refuse to take this vaccine should be pentalized somehow. Getting some of their basic freedoms imped since COVID-19 is a deadly virus. Proven over and over again to be able to kill young as well as old
Also @x65943 isn't it FDA approved? Since it's being distributed in the US therefore in fact it's approved right? Even when they say "emergency".
If people still adhere to the CDC guidelines of wearing mask and social distance, then there shouldn't be much of a repercussions. It's not like they would be spreading the virus on purpose.Nobody should be forced by law to get vaccinated, but that doesn't mean a person should be free of repercussions when choosing not to be vaccinated. For example, if a person wants to travel on an airplane, they might need to be vaccinated. There are also the obvious repercussions of one's moral conscience, considering it's pretty petulant for someone to willingly not he vaccinated when medically able to do so.
The fact remains that the longer people delay getting vaccinated, the longer we will have to continue wearing masks and social distancing, and the more people who are going to get infected and die.The FDA has not approve the vacine, I posted a link on this post. As for the penalty, yes, after the vaccine is approve from the FDA, not before.
If people still adhere to the CDC guidelines of wearing mask and social distance, then there shouldn't be much of a repercussions. It's not like they would be spreading the virus on purpose.
Also what about the people whom is concerned about the vaccine? Again if they follow the existing rules but want to wait for the FDA approval, I see nothing wrong with that. The pushers themselves from what I can see is also lacking in moral conscience themselves. If this isn't true, then they should be able to see both sides of the view.
And as I said before we know it's safe in the short term but at best are making educated guesses about the long termEverything you said is technically correct, but emergency use authorization is not to say the safety tests weren't rigorous. As I said in the past, emergency use authorization has less to do with whether or not we know the vaccine is safe and more to do with bureaucratic technicalities. Plenty of countries, particularly in Europe, have approved the vaccine without needing to do it through emergency use.
Most things in life are calculated risks, but that doesn't mean they aren't demonstrably safe.
Currently the driver is availability.The fact remains that the longer people delay getting vaccinated, the longer we will have to continue wearing masks and social distancing, and the more people who are going to get infected and die.
In the short term, the driver is availability. In the long term, the driver is petulance.Currently the driver is availability.
Even israel is only at 10% of the population vaccinated - currently.
Well people could always wait for the AstraZeneca one. It's made on tradional methods of injecting a protein instead. Or that Russian one... Sputnik VAnd as I said before we know it's safe in the short term but at best are making educated guesses about the long term
Right, however these also could have long ranging side effects we don't know aboutWell people could always wait for the AstraZeneca one. It's made on tradional methods of injecting a protein instead. Or that Russian one... Sputnik V