Homebrew Question Mario 64 port?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristianity77
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 152,107
  • Replies Replies 519
  • Likes Likes 1
TitleID - 054507E0B7552000
BuildID - 4a7114c9560237cb
Version is obviously 1.0.0

Patjenova Posted these. Seems to be working great. Now just need to see about other Codes :D
[01# Moonjump]
80000002
04000000 0182AC94 42800000
20000000

[02# Speed x2]
80000001
04000000 0182AC9C 44000000
20000000

[03# Max health]
01000000 0182AD33 00000008

[04# Max Lifes]
01000000 0182AD31 00000009

[05# 99 Coins]
01000000 0182AD2C 00000063
 
We did not build nor do we take ownership of the build of Super Mario 64 for the Switch that was released. No one on our team is responsible for it. We are taking this seriously and are asking people not to spread the build. No one to our knowledge has done a deep analysis of it's code, which could possible contain code to brick consoles. We already know whoever made it is a bad actor for using our name and likeness, and we urge people not to run apps/games from un-trusted sources.
 
This is what Nintendo gets for letting us in the dark
Now we can make our own New Super F-Mother Prime Country - Threeie
I disagree with the first sentence. I love the title New Super F-Mother Prime Country - Threeie.
 
Anyone know if someone is trying to see if a 3DS / N3DS Version can be done? Hell, a Vita Port could be interesting, but would need it to have a TitleID that can work with VitaCheat

Also, for the Switch Build......
[Infinite Hat Usage]
02000000 0182AD3A 00000700

[Inv-Met-Fly Mario]
02000000 0182AC4C 0000011E

[Inv-Fly Mario]
02000000 0182AC4C 0000011A
 
Where is the Reddit thread about this port?
We can't link it here, bud. It's warez and GBAtemp does not condone warez
We did not build nor do we take ownership of the build of Super Mario 64 for the Switch that was released. No one on our team is responsible for it. We are taking this seriously and are asking people not to spread the build. No one to our knowledge has done a deep analysis of it's code, which could possible contain code to brick consoles. We already know whoever made it is a bad actor for using our name and likeness, and we urge people not to run apps/games from un-trusted sources.
Why would someone lie about that?
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum