Hacking Do you think that hackers will ever take full control of the switch?

Do you think that hackers will ever take full control of the switch


  • Total voters
    172

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,643
Trophies
2
XP
5,863
Country
United Kingdom
How is Boot2 more powerful than FuseeGelee?

Because it's permanent, not tethered.

I don’t know much about Wii stuff. Does that exploit get ran before execution is handed over to the OS?

Yes, boot 2 is what loads the OS.

If I remember right, it executes in the last part of the booting process (Boot2) before Nand or any IOS is touched.
(I'm a bit hazy on Wii too though, so someone correct me if I'm wrong).

Well it's loaded from nand, as is boot1 (boot0 is loaded from mask rom).

An untethered coldboot exploit would be worse than our current tethered coldboot exploit because it would require you to be on a certain firmware version.

If we're talking about a hypothetical made up untethered coldboot exploit, then why can't we make one up that runs on all firmwares?
 
Last edited by smf,
  • Like
Reactions: 8BitWonder

Draxzelex

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
19,011
Trophies
2
Age
29
Location
New York City
XP
13,379
Country
United States
If we're talking about a hypothetical made up untethered coldboot exploit, then why can't we make one up that runs on all firmwares?
Because we would need something that we can hijack that is executed before the fuse check of which does not seem like a very extensive list of avenues.
 

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,643
Trophies
2
XP
5,863
Country
United Kingdom
Because we would need something that we can hijack that is executed before the fuse check of which does not seem like a very extensive list of avenues.

It's not an extensive list, currently there are zero entries. So until there are some workable methods, then you can't really say anything about them.
 

Draxzelex

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
19,011
Trophies
2
Age
29
Location
New York City
XP
13,379
Country
United States
It's not an extensive list, currently there are zero entries. So until there are some workable methods, then you can't really say anything about them.
I don't get it, you initially responded with lets make an untethered coldboot exploit and now you're saying there is none. Pick one.
 

Silent_Gunner

Crazy Cool Cyclops
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
2,696
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
4,727
Country
United States
They can modify all system files just fine. The problem is that the firmware will see that the changes haven't been signed by Nintendo, and refuse to boot.

So unless Nintendo's private key gets leaked, or some other bootloader-stage exploit is found, both of which are very unlikely to ever happen, this is as close as we'll get.

And that's fine. If you want a CFW without a jig or payload dongle, go find a switch running 4.1.0. Otherwise, be happy with what we have. Because based on information SciresM has posted, I highly doubt we'll see anything better anytime soon, if at all. But I'd say we have about as much "full control" as we could ever hope for. You can run Linux, you can run Android, you've got 3 good CFWs to pick from (4 if you count Kosmos - I just consider that to be "pre-packaged" Atmosphere though.) In Horizon, we have custom themes, even animated ones. We have all sorts of homebrew, including emulators and ports of PC games. We have system modules that give added functionality like background music and FTP services. We even have cheats and game mods. I'm not sure what more you could hope for, other than booting without RCM payloads.

Would it be possible, theoretically speaking, to downgrade to that OFW via ChouDujourNX and use the method you described for booting into CFW?
 

RHOPKINS13

Geek
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
1,354
Trophies
2
XP
2,623
Country
United States
Would it be possible, theoretically speaking, to downgrade to that OFW via ChouDujourNX and use the method you described for booting into CFW?

No, but only because the Switch uses eFuses. 4.1.0 expects the Switch to have 5 burned eFuses. If it sees that there are more than that, it will refuse to boot. 8.1.0 expects 10, and 9.x expects 11.

You can downgrade to 4.1.0 and use Hekate to bypass the fuse check, but in order to do that you'll need to push a payload, which defeats the purpose of downgrading to 4.1.0.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silent_Gunner

Silent_Gunner

Crazy Cool Cyclops
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
2,696
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
4,727
Country
United States
No, but only because the Switch uses eFuses. 4.1.0 expects the Switch to have 5 burned eFuses. If it sees that there are more than that, it will refuse to boot. 8.1.0 expects 10, and 9.x expects 11.

You can downgrade to 4.1.0 and use Hekate to bypass the fuse check, but in order to do that you'll need to push a payload, which defeats the purpose of downgrading to 4.1.0.

So that's why my Switch would never turn on until I accidentally updated to 9.0 on my hacked Switch...
 

Dax_Fame

Annoying Member
Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
495
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Mom's house
XP
1,275
Country
United States
I feel like I'm not explaining myself properly or not properly understanding people's responses lol...
  • I'm NOT comparing Android running on whatever to Horizon running on the Switch
  • I'm comparing Android running on the Switch to Horizon running on the Switch
  • I'm comparing the performance of the same software (Retroarch) running on the same hardware but on a different OS
I'm wondering why it is that there are more cores and better performance on the exact same hardware. What is the reason for this beyond full access to the hardware, if it's supposedly not the reason?
 

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,643
Trophies
2
XP
5,863
Country
United Kingdom
Fusee is more powerful then :P.

Fusee loses points for being tethered.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I don't get it, you initially responded with lets make an untethered coldboot exploit and now you're saying there is none. Pick one.

No, I said "make one up" as in pretend there is one.

You're pretending there is one with specific limitations. You said that was a problem, so I suggested we could just pretend there was one without those limitations instead.

Problem solved.
 
Last edited by smf,
  • Like
Reactions: Parax342

ZachyCatGames

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
3,398
Trophies
1
Location
Hell
XP
4,209
Country
United States
Ok, then it seems it's equal with Wii, PS3, xbox, DSi then.

There are actually very few exploits less powerful than fusee
It’s not equal to the Wii’s exploit, dunno about the other systems. Fusee is an exploit in the bootrom, which is the first code that’s ran on the bpmp when booting the system, it would be equivalent to a boot0 exploit on Wii if one existed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Resaec and Parax342

DaniPoo

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
925
Trophies
1
Age
35
XP
2,288
Country
That's my understanding, but said key would be highly illegal to distribute even if it did get cracked. And these keys are practically uncrackable - it's more likely that it would be leaked by someone working for Nintendo. And I think it's safe to say Nintendo has probably limited access to all but a very few select employees for this key.

I thought private key's were unique for each system thus being called private? :) No point in "leaking" private keys as noone is going to be able to use them.
Also I though we were able to dump pretty much everything already. I'm also curious whats left.. My guess is the bootloader perhaps?

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

That’s wrong, having exploitless code is possible and has been done.

Now really sure what you are talking about with the exploitless code stuff.. But how is azoreseuropa wrong in his statement?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parax342

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
I thought private key's were unique for each system thus being called private? :) No point in "leaking" private keys as noone is going to be able to use them.
Also I though we were able to dump pretty much everything already. I'm also curious whats left.. My guess is the bootloader perhaps?
Private keys in this case refers to the idea of public-private key cryptography aka asymmetric cryptography. There are things that can be done with system level/user/device level keys.



https://www.khanacademy.org/computi...tro/v/the-internet-encryption-and-public-keys



If you have the private key then you can essentially make whatever code you like appear as though Nintendo gave it their blessing. This is what was generated for the PS3 back when ( https://media.ccc.de/v/27c3-4087-en-console_hacking_2010 ), though not so many things use elliptical based stuff as much as prime numbers (or probably primes numbers as the case may be).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parax342

ZachyCatGames

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
3,398
Trophies
1
Location
Hell
XP
4,209
Country
United States
I'm also curious whats left.. My guess is the bootloader perhaps?

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Now really sure what you are talking about with the exploitless code stuff.. But how is azoreseuropa wrong in his statement?
bootrom, pk1ldr and package1 have been dumped. Everything except some TSEC and Lotus shit has been publicly dumped/dumpable.

They’re saying that everything is exploitable/hackable, which is straight up untrue
 
Last edited by ZachyCatGames,
  • Like
Reactions: TheCyberQuake

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0FyqCEfD0E