Now that's the first truly funny thing you've said. The rest of your post would be absolutely pathetic if I wasn't acutely aware it's meant to be parody.
Yet you cannot prove to me that he has done anything truly racist. Not hidden racism like "infested" or "calling all Mexicans rapist and drug dealers". That's all leftist propaganda. I mean any policies that are against any race (not nationality).
Well done, definitely getting more audible laughs from me now.
Fascism exists on both extremes. You are in denial about that while you subvert real points being made with a condescending attitude.
Authoritarianism perhaps, but fascism is exclusive to the right-wing given that it's a form of nationalism taken to the extreme. Communism is on the far left of the political spectrum, with anarchism being even further to the left of that.
Or perhaps your "real points" are just more of the same right-wing strawmen arguments that are easily dismissed? Neither taxation nor universal healthcare systems require any discernible form of socialism to implement. If you're willing to concede that point, I have no issue continuing our discussion on either topic.
Aww, and you had such a streak going. This isn't funny at all. Go back to the "verifiable facts and documented video evidence are all leftist propaganda" shtick.
and just like with how you say Trump is being a racist, you say things without giving valid examples when the left is both racist and fascist. Wow, and you dare call me a parody.
Oh, the "ignorant to the fact that the parties swapped positions" guy, that one's a classic. The party of Nixon and Trump is also the party of Lincoln, right?
If not for the part about anti-fascists being fascist, you'd have all your subtle humor grouped up nicely here. For anyone who might not get it: Hitler loosened gun laws in order to aide the nationalists and brownshirts. "Straight pride" is connected to the paradox of tolerance, and certainly nobody wants another Charlottesville on their hands. And of course, Facebook/Google are private companies, who are permitted to enforce any TOU/EULA they wish, a concept that Republicans used to be fully in favor of, but now only support when it's convenient.
when did this "switch" happen exactly? After the Civil Rights movement when Lyndon B Johnson said that he'd have all the n-words voting for Democrats for the next 200 years?
Nixon was a rino(or incogdemo-crat). Lincoln and Trump were and is the Greatest presidents we've had so far, respectively.The party of Nixon and Trump is also the party of Lincoln, right?
More leftist propaganda as usual. I forget that Democrats are psychic and can see the future(even though it's really their imagination based on their feelings). No proof that anything bad would happen unless Democratic fascists showed up and tried to stop them with violence. I bet you don't know that the right is a peaceful group that wants fairness in society.
. I wonder if you would say this still if they were ran by conservatives and were censoring Democratic voices.
Oh god please stop. This one has me in tears.
. Oh, another good point I didn't think of. Thanks. Our education system is shitty as all it does is fill our, and our children's, minds with leftist propaganda. I see that it has done wonders for you, (sorry, I meant did a good job on you), though. Like I've said before, hopefully, you can snap out of your leftist mind control and will finally be able to think for yourself to finally see the truth of how you are being used by your Democrat overlords.Oh god please stop. This one has me in tears.
I'm glad I seem to now understand your brand of humor a little better, I'm sure our views on politics are closely aligned. I know our education system is fairly shitty, but nobody is dumb enough to genuinely believe this stuff. Of course it had to be parody.
Israel already has a big beautiful wall, and it works great for them like ours will work for us. You'll see.
Granted, plenty of politicians are liars and in it just for the power. Politicians who genuinely believe in and fight for the right ideals are limited to perhaps three in a lifetime at most.
It simply doesn't get any more capitalist than taxation for the purpose of corporate profit and private healthcare insurance as an entire industry. So we're obviously not going to agree on this point. Your definition of socialism is entirely too broad and strays far from the dictionary's definition.
Socialism as a boogeyman to be feared is a strawman. The same nonsense fear-mongering has been employed since FDR was in office.
Anyone left of center is "crazy," right? Seems impossible for you to ever carry a civil conversation for more than a few replies without resorting to ad hominems. Unfortunate.
If you've misunderstood any of my previous statements as hostile in tone, I apologize, that was not my intention. No need to devolve the conversation further.
I was agreeing with you there and nowhere did I claim that to be a factual statement. There's even a "perhaps" included which should've made that clear. You really just can't stop yourself from being confrontational.
