That makes little sense from where I sit. I would still be content to blame the government for triggering article 50 without an agreement as to what was being sought and loads of people having their own ideas (mainly because there was no agreed up setup at the time of the referendum), and proceeding to twiddle their thumbs for the next however long whilst hamstringing what efforts were being made to negotiate. Similarly what would "real brexit" look like? To some I imagine it is WTO agreements, others would probably go for minimal EU oversight but some kind of special relationship owing to the ease of trade and history thereof, others would be content to adopt some of the things the likes of Norway, Switzerland and such have and many remixes of all of those, and some things I likely have not considered. Any of those could justifiably be called "real" and not what another camp in the debate would care for, even if they nominally fall under the leave banner.Honestly, if there is no Brexit, the British people have nobody to blame but themselves. Parliament makes the final decision. If they don't like it, they should not have voted for Labor or May's party. Both of them were against a real Brexit.
It's like the "lesser of two evils" arguments in the USA. Then don't vote for either, you morons!
No offence...
The thing is with Norway, switzerland and so forth that they never have been a part of the EU to begin with and in general always have been on good terms with each other while the UK has been a part of the EU, constantly slandering the EU, working against the EU and they left themselves and are gonna expect the same deal as Norway and Switzerland have ? That is NEVER going to happen. I'm not saying you do but a lot of people in the UK expect a deal like that and constantly bring up switzerland and NorwayThat makes little sense from where I sit. I would still be content to blame the government for triggering article 50 without an agreement as to what was being sought and loads of people having their own ideas (mainly because there was no agreed up setup at the time of the referendum), and proceeding to twiddle their thumbs for the next however long whilst hamstringing what efforts were being made to negotiate. Similarly what would "real brexit" look like? To some I imagine it is WTO agreements, others would probably go for minimal EU oversight but some kind of special relationship owing to the ease of trade and history thereof, others would be content to adopt some of the things the likes of Norway, Switzerland and such have and many remixes of all of those, and some things I likely have not considered. Any of those could justifiably be called "real" and not what another camp in the debate would care for, even if they nominally fall under the leave banner.
The thing is with Norway, switzerland and so forth that they never have been a part of the EU to begin with and in general always have been on good terms with each other while the UK has been a part of the EU, constantly slandering the EU, working against the EU and they left themselves and are gonna expect the same deal as Norway and Switzerland have ? That is NEVER going to happen. I'm not saying you do but a lot of people in the UK expect a deal like that and constantly bring up switzerland and Norway
The thing is with Norway, switzerland and so forth that they never have been a part of the EU to begin with and in general always have been on good terms with each other while the UK has been a part of the EU, constantly slandering the EU, working against the EU and they left themselves and are gonna expect the same deal as Norway and Switzerland have ? That is NEVER going to happen. I'm not saying you do but a lot of people in the UK expect a deal like that and constantly bring up switzerland and Norway
Totally looks like a better version of a dude we "know"right here.
Probably worth mentioning : there has been a huge pro-EU demonstration in London yesterday. Over a million people matched against the 'circus'. The online petition for a second referendum needs 100'000 votes to be heard by parliament but is now at four million signatures.
Almost as bad as the 'leave' crew running a marketing campaign before they had any idea what a deal to leave might actually look like.It's great they managed to organise a march but couldn't organise a march to the ballot box 3 years ago.
Almost as bad as the 'leave' crew running a marketing campaign before they had any idea what a deal to leave might actually look like.
Without a pre-established deal, there is no binary choice. It was more like a false choice, because the 'leave' option didn't really have any substance behind it, and somehow it still doesn't. Personally I think they never should've held the vote at all, it's clear now that people didn't have the information they needed to make an informed decision.But I'll add it makes no difference whatsoever what leave 'looks like' It was a binary choice, in or out.
Without a pre-established deal, there is no binary choice. It was more like a false choice, because the 'leave' option didn't really have any substance behind it, and somehow it still doesn't. Personally I think they never should've held the vote at all, it's clear now that people didn't have the information they needed to make an informed decision.
"Voted for what we voted for." And what did you vote for exactly? You voted 'leave.' What does that entail? Apparently nobody knows since you won't explain it, and neither will the leave campaigners that dipped right the fuck out as soon as the vote passed.It wasn't a false choice, we voted for what we voted for
"Voted for what we voted for." And what did you vote for exactly? You voted 'leave.' What does that entail? Apparently nobody knows since you won't explain it, and neither will the leave campaigners that dipped right the fuck out as soon as the vote passed.
Obviously I don't really have a horse in this race, and Brexiteers are free to shoot themselves in the foot as many times as they'd like. The rest of us are just wondering why.
I asked you to explain what the leave vote actually entails, not why you voted the way you did. Was there a 'leave deal' in the end, or did Britain already leave the EU without any established terms? Or is this entire fiasco still ongoing?Again, I dont need to explain why I voted to you.
No, It's really not worth mentioning. Remoaners doing what they've done for the past 3 years .. moaning. The online petition has had every country in the world sign it! This thread has been hilarious. I'm glad you find it newsworthy that the London elite, which is full of middle to upperclass muppets and every EU national you could imagine, managed to walk out their front doors for a quick stroll around London in their echo chamber yesterday. Still, 5million mostly duplicates/fradulent signatures doesn't quite come close to 17.4m real votes. It's great they managed to organise a march but couldn't organise a march to the ballot box 3 years ago.