It seems that is the get-out-of-jail-free card.your content on the account is safe.
Although, it would be interesting to see a debate between lawyers on the legalities of holding your purchases hostage, purely for academic reasons.
It seems that is the get-out-of-jail-free card.your content on the account is safe.
I was saying if you dont want to get yourself banned and still can sysupdate. (You still get banned from using nsps, but this ban does let you update your firmware.)They're banning those too.
It seems that is the get-out-of-jail-free card.
Although, it would be interesting to see a debate between lawyers on the legalities of holding your purchases hostage, purely for academic reasons.
I got banned a few weeks ago and I can still download stuff from the CDN with my cert fine. I'm guessing there was a point where they just went "fuck it" and started blocking CDNs completely. It doesn't seem to be retroactive.
It seems that is the get-out-of-jail-free card.
Although, it would be interesting to see a debate between lawyers on the legalities of holding your purchases hostage, purely for academic reasons.
The point would be the ability to update despite a banI easily could but what would the point of that be?
Easier just to revoke everything than having to handle tiered bans, and any game that wants it will be carrying the relevant updates for those without internet. No loss for them for blocking updates, and indeed maybe even a few perks.Nintendo is going hard this time around... blocking the access to eshop completely I could understand, but blocking firmware updates?
YesSo just to be clear, this full degree ban from all online services is only if you used your own cert for CDN?
Easier just to revoke everything than having to handle tiered bans, and any game that wants it will be carrying the relevant updates for those without internet. No loss for them for blocking updates, and indeed maybe even a few perks.
Granted every time I have seen this in the past where it is reasonably relevant (so mainly the PS3 and 360) updates could be found and presented by USB or something, that even being an "official" method. I see that more as an amusing quirk though rather than anything troubling.
Was your cert used in CDNSP?Nintendo is starting to ban certs from CDN access. This will make your console useless for downloading games, updates for your games, dlc, and sysupdates. Please be cautious when using anything that access the CDN i.e. FreeShopNX, CDNSP, etc. You've been warned.
Edit: Here is some proof even Sysupdates are blocked: https://streamable.com/k623d
I kind of disagree with almost everything you said there, but unfortunately I have kids screaming at me from all directions so can't commit to a proper response at the moment. To be continued...Your purchases aren't intricately linked to your switch, they are linked to your account. The switch is just the tool you bought to make use of said content.
If said tool is compromised and its connection to the network is no longer secured, of course they can block it. It has no connection to the purchase of your licenses.
They aren't obligated to provide you with the means to make use of the game purchases, it's like buying a blu-ray of Blade Runner and then calling Warner Bros. to ask "Yo, where's the TV i need to watch this?"
Nothing is held hostage, there's nothing to discuss
Atum uses seperate servers for dispatching system updates, game updates, DLC, and games.I can understand that it’s easier for them but it still seems a bit too much for me. Patch the freeshop and leave the firmware updates available for banned consoles would be only logical for me. Imagine some new malware, bug, wtv, manages to screw your switch on 5.1 and 6.0 fixed that issue. Banned people would loose access (directly) to urgent bug fixes
FreeShopNX uses your personal certIs the public cert for CDNSP the same as the one in FreeShopNX?