Hacking New 3DS XL A9LH. ctrtransfer question

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
Hi. I have a new 3DS XL I'm planning to install A9LH on. I'm looking at the 3ds guide and noticed the files all seem to be the same ones as the old 3DS especially the 2.1.0 ctrtransfer. I already seen not to close the lid on 2.1.0 or update it because I'll brick it but I'm just wondering if it's ok to use the 2.1.0 I got from the guide since the file is titled "2.1.0-4E_ctrtransfer_o3ds.zip"

It looks like the file works on all DS according to the guide but just want to be sure so I don't brick it. The title of that file saying o3ds is a bit misleading so you understand my curiosity lol.

Thanks.
 

Quantumcat

Dead and alive
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
15,144
Trophies
0
Location
Canberra, Australia
Website
boot9strap.com
XP
11,094
Country
Australia
Hi. I have a new 3DS XL I'm planning to install A9LH on. I'm looking at the 3ds guide and noticed the files all seem to be the same ones as the old 3DS especially the 2.1.0 ctrtransfer. I already seen not to close the lid on 2.1.0 or update it because I'll brick it but I'm just wondering if it's ok to use the 2.1.0 I got from the guide since the file is titled "2.1.0-4E_ctrtransfer_o3ds.zip"

It looks like the file works on all DS according to the guide but just want to be sure so I don't brick it. The title of that file saying o3ds is a bit misleading so you understand my curiosity lol.

Thanks.
The N3DS never came with 2.1 firmware, so all 2.1 files will be old 3DS ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchoolTech

comput3rus3r

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Messages
3,580
Trophies
1
Age
123
XP
4,921
Country
United States
Yes its fine. Just make sure not to close lid while on 2.1. The reason there's no n3ds file is because 2.1 was only an old3ds firmware. Follow the guide to the T. No chance of bricking as long as you dont do something stupid like doing something the quide repeatedly tells you not to do. Have fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchoolTech

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
Yes its fine. Just make sure not to close lid while on 2.1. The reason there's no n3ds file is because 2.1 was only an old3ds firmware. Follow the guide to the T. No chance of bricking as long as you dont do something stupid like doing something the quide repeatedly tells you not to do. Have fun.

No problem thanks. I'll report back here if I get stuck.
 

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
OK so I ran into another problem here and don't know what to do next. I have everything done and installed an emunand. I formatted the system to unlink the nands but now the emunand hasn't got homebrew. I have soundhax still to get the homebrew launcher and a9lh but when I try to hold start and inject the hs.app again to access fbi it just fails with some can't do this on o3ds<7.x or a9lh. I need to access a cia installer now to get anywhere.

Using FBI.3dsx in homebrew launcher just says kernel exploit needed
 
Last edited by OldSchoolTech,

comput3rus3r

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Messages
3,580
Trophies
1
Age
123
XP
4,921
Country
United States
OK so I ran into another problem here and don't know what to do next. I have everything done and installed an emunand. I formatted the system to unlink the nands but now the emunand hasn't got homebrew. I have soundhax still to get the homebrew launcher and a9lh but when I try to hold start and inject the hs.app again to access fbi it just fails with some can't do this on o3ds<7.x or a9lh. I need to access a cia installer now to get anywhere.

Using FBI.3dsx in homebrew launcher just says kernel exploit needed
I didn't use emunand so I have no clue. Did you already have emunand before you started the guide?
 

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
I had to do a 9.2.0 ctrtransfer then use soundhax again and launch fbi from homebrew launcher and it worked. 11 must be too updated for fbi to have permission. So I cloned my sysnand to emunand again on 9.2.0 and then unlinked the nands only for the same thing to happen (all the homebrew gone from both nands) only this time both my emunand and sysnand are on 9.2.0 and still not linked meaning I can easily fix everything using soundhax and fbi on my emunand then update it. I have all that working now but I don't know whether to update sysnand or leave it on 9.2.0 in case since I'll be using emunand.
 

comput3rus3r

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Messages
3,580
Trophies
1
Age
123
XP
4,921
Country
United States
I had to do a 9.2.0 ctrtransfer then use soundhax again and launch fbi from homebrew launcher and it worked. 11 must be too updated for fbi to have permission. So I cloned my sysnand to emunand again on 9.2.0 and then unlinked the nands only for the same thing to happen (all the homebrew gone from both nands) only this time both my emunand and sysnand are on 9.2.0 and still not linked meaning I can easily fix everything using soundhax and fbi on my emunand then update it. I have all that working now but I don't know whether to update sysnand or leave it on 9.2.0 in case since I'll be using emunand.
You know more than I do. Ive never used emunand. Glad you got it working.
 

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
You know more than I do. Ive never used emunand. Glad you got it working.
Main reason I use an emunand is so if something goes wrong I still have a system nand with no problems. That and the emunand can be on the latest firmware and the system nand can be on another version. My sysnand is 9.2.0-20e and my emunand is fully updated. Since I've figured out homebrew has permission problems now on 11 I might aswell leave my sysnand on 9.2 in case I need access rather than doing another ctrtransfer to fix it.
 

Quantumcat

Dead and alive
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
15,144
Trophies
0
Location
Canberra, Australia
Website
boot9strap.com
XP
11,094
Country
Australia
Main reason I use an emunand is so if something goes wrong I still have a system nand with no problems.
This is not needed anymore. With a9lh both sysNAND and emuNAND are equally recoverable. You don't gain any protection by using emuNAND.
That and the emunand can be on the latest firmware and the system nand can be on another version.
With a9lh, sysNAND can be updated. You don't need an emuNAND for that. That was only required pre-2016.
My sysnand is 9.2.0-20e and my emunand is fully updated. Since I've figured out homebrew has permission problems now on 11 I might aswell leave my sysnand on 9.2 in case I need access rather than doing another ctrtransfer to fix it.
You never need to use any homebrew that can only work on 9.2. All of that homebrew can be accessed using a Luma payload. You're doing things completely different to the standard. Having an emuNAND just creates problems, like
  • Needing to install GBA and DSiWare in both NANDs.
  • Having to go through a complicated process to change SD cards
  • You can lose your whole system if your SD card gets corrupt (having to restore from a backup, or losing all your stuff if you don't have a backup).
  • And lots of other stuff.
There is good reason why nobody uses emuNAND anymore. It is outdated now, except for specific purposes like having two regions on the same console or installing more than 300 titles on one console.
 

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland
This is not needed anymore. With a9lh both sysNAND and emuNAND are equally recoverable. You don't gain any protection by using emuNAND. With a9lh, sysNAND can be updated. You don't need an emuNAND for that. That was only required pre-2016. You never need to use any homebrew that can only work on 9.2. All of that homebrew can be accessed using a Luma payload. You're doing things completely different to the standard. Having an emuNAND just creates problems, like
  • Needing to install GBA and DSiWare in both NANDs.
  • Having to go through a complicated process to change SD cards
  • You can lose your whole system if your SD card gets corrupt (having to restore from a backup, or losing all your stuff if you don't have a backup).
  • And lots of other stuff.
There is good reason why nobody uses emuNAND anymore. It is outdated now, except for specific purposes like having two regions on the same console or installing more than 300 titles on one console.

Yeah actually I suppose once I have a nand backup everything should be ok since I have a9lh with access to all the payloads. Can I transfer all the games I already have installed on my emunand to my sysnand then or would I have to do all the installing and downloading again to switch over?
 
Last edited by OldSchoolTech,

Quantumcat

Dead and alive
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
15,144
Trophies
0
Location
Canberra, Australia
Website
boot9strap.com
XP
11,094
Country
Australia
Yeah actually I suppose once I have a nand backup everything should be ok since I have a9lh with access to all the payloads. Can I transfer all the games I already have installed on my emunand to my sysnand then or would I have to do all the installing and downloading again to switch over?
Yep just follow https://3ds.guide/move-emunand
 

OldSchoolTech

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
196
Trophies
0
XP
278
Country
Ireland

Will do thanks. I didn't know emunands were outdated. I actually only found out about a9lh last week and got the new ds earlier so didn't know too much about it and didn't wanna brick a brand new console.

Edit: I had the old 3ds console on menuhax and an emunand and didn't realise so much had changed.
 
Last edited by OldSchoolTech,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    OctoAori20 @ OctoAori20: Nice nice-