Hacking NUSPacker - pack files into installable packages

Sumea

Disco Ninja Frog
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,589
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Turku
XP
946
Country
Finland
Like asked before; is this somehow superior to the SDK method or just the same thing in open source fashion?
I wasted already ton of time repacking a lot of content that in the end did not work, and it made me want to commit sudoku, I would like to know before I dive now.
 

timogus

Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
22
Trophies
0
Age
37
XP
257
Country
United States
Like asked before; is this somehow superior to the SDK method or just the same thing in open source fashion?
I wasted already ton of time repacking a lot of content that in the end did not work, and it made me want to commit sudoku, I would like to know before I dive now.

This tries just to do the same thing the sdk tool is doing.
In allmost all cases the packed data is the problem, not the packer. For example the bootmovie h264 need to be the exact same hash as expected, otherwise the title won't boot
 

Sumea

Disco Ninja Frog
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,589
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Turku
XP
946
Country
Finland
This tries just to do the same thing the sdk tool is doing.
In allmost all cases the packed data is the problem, not the packer. For example the bootmovie h264 need to be the exact same hash as expected, otherwise the title won't boot
I dunno how, The data works as is on Loadiine, or is straight from NUS without any modification, and just repacked for the region or whatever - I thought repacking also rehashes the whole thing, and don't we also have sigpatches? I mean what point is there to have them, if we still have problems that are at least loosely signature related?
 

timogus

Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
22
Trophies
0
Age
37
XP
257
Country
United States
I dunno how, The data works as is on Loadiine, or is straight from NUS without any modification, and just repacked for the region or whatever - I thought repacking also rehashes the whole thing, and don't we also have sigpatches? I mean what point is there to have them, if we still have problems that are at least loosely signature related?
Notice that the code folder dumped with ddd won't work. So almost all "loadiine ready games" won't work. Straight from nus should be fine
 

Zamkad

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Oct 19, 2016
Messages
19
Trophies
0
Age
25
Location
Moscow
Website
vk.com
XP
71
Country
Serbia, Republic of
There is Russian Fan-traslation of Twilight Princess HD and i'll be wery happy, when i can play this game on my HDD, without these deadly lond loadings.
2513007.jpg
 

Sumea

Disco Ninja Frog
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,589
Trophies
1
Age
32
Location
Turku
XP
946
Country
Finland
Notice that the code folder dumped with ddd won't work. So almost all "loadiine ready games" won't work. Straight from nus should be fine
I had repacked a patch straight from nus - which did not work. And I really need to know what is different between CODE folder from DDD, or ripped from WUD, or from NUS - they are just about identical decrypted, do they store some secret meta data to their previous encryption or what is there. Given repacking the contents makes new tickets and everything this is weird. I would love a way to circumvent this since biggest things rednand, at least in my opinion, should offer over the sysnand options is fan patched games, out of region games in home menu, and other such features, currently when I repacked quite a few things with SDK, mostly none of these worked. If we have this limitation and it stays, what good is CFW on Wii U gonna really be? Damn near nothing in my opinion.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnRVIC7kS4s