Don't forget Far Cry: Vengence was a Ubisoft Wii Exclusive there's actually quite a bit that Ubisoft does for nintendo
Don't forget Far Cry: Vengence was a Ubisoft Wii Exclusive there's actually quite a bit that Ubisoft does for nintendo
I would like to see that
Doesn't seem to be fake.
A new 3d Rayman game would also be nice, but unlikely to happen.
But they were very good stillI think after traveling through dimensional portals, then fighting pirates and a dark lum rayman's 3D days are over
these don't have a single game on a nintendo console. Rayman has since the N64Now all we need is Crash Bandicoot and Master Chief and we are all set for life.
Huh? I'm talking about trying to get some cheap money back after the investment of the DLC, it doesn't matter where the free DLC development went.It wasn't on the Wii U though, Assassin's Creed Unity has nothing to do with the Wii U console and their relationship with Nintendo.
Well perhaps they both are desperate. All I see from ubisoft is patching up shit games, blaming 95% piracy figures, and keys being stolen and resold. They are constantly whining about something with their not-so-brilliant PR strategy, oftentimes being aggressive towards consumers like people owe them something. Either it's a plan of theirs to make us feel bad about them, or they aren't in the best of positions.Foxi4 said:Out of the two collaborating companies, it's Nintendo who's desperate, not Ubisoft. Ubisoft would continue to exist even if Nintendo closed down tomorrow morning, the Wii U might as well not exist as far as Ubisoft is concerned - they have other more profitable outlets. That's not the case for Nintendo - they have to patch up the sinking ship, so it makes sense to create content like this, it keeps fans excited. My guess is that Ubisoft would merely lend the character for a sizable sum while Nintendo takes the brunt of the development, should this be true.
these don't have a single game on a nintendo console. Rayman has since the N64
Not a fan I'm tired of having non-nintendo characters in Smash it defeats the whole purpose. Why not actually add new Nintendo characters such as new Pokemon characters into the mix we've got 720 Pokemon's so don't tell me Nintendo doesn't have enough characters. At this rate we'll soon have a Dark Magician in our roster... Sigh
Crash belongs to Activision not Sony. They can release a crash game on what ever console they wish. and after some research I have to correct myself Crash has games on Nintendo platforms.I was being sarcastic. XD
If you didn't notice, I mentioned mascots that are exclusive to Sony and Microsoft. XD
Hmm fire emblem characters..Hope this is fake. Just can't see him being a good character. Considering all the shitty characters the game already has, we don't need more.
No more fucking pokemon, half the roster is already pokermans.
Hmm fire emblem characters..
Half the roster is fire emblenHell no , we have a shitload of them as it is, how about more Star Fox characters?
Crash belongs to Activision not Sony. They can release a crash game on what ever console they wish. and after some research I have to correct myself Crash has games on Nintendo platforms.
Half the roster is fire emblen