Should Sega sell their franchises to Nintendo & Sony?

To which company should Sega sell their franchises?

  • Nintendo

    Votes: 30 44.8%
  • Sony

    Votes: 5 7.5%
  • Microsoft

    Votes: 1 1.5%
  • Valve

    Votes: 8 11.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • They shouldn't sell them!

    Votes: 20 29.9%

  • Total voters
    67

Acidflare

HomeBrew Beta Tester
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,106
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
Nether World
XP
268
Country
Canada
oh it's better then awesome it's fantastic the work the community did on this it's better then the work Team Sonic did on SA2:Battle port to X360/PS3/PC
 

RodrigoDavy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,453
Trophies
0
XP
879
Country
Brazil
I never found Sega's franchises all that good. Even at its peak, Sega's games were never on par with games from companies like Capcom, Konami, Nintendo and Square. I would argue that even companies like Rareware and Naughty Dog beat the shit out of Sega in terms of quality back then. I see people complaining that Sega lost its touch, but it was never that great of a company to begin with.

I think we can compare Sega to Namco, both were industry veterans, both got lucky and had unexpected iconic games that made a huge success (Pacman and Sonic) and both still make great games nowadays. The difference between them is that Namco understand that Pacman's time is gone and treat it like a lucrative niche market, meanwhile Sega has yet to figure out how to make Sonic work nowadays and is staining the franchise with each mediocre release. Nobody expect Bandai Namco to release a AAA pacman game because they know pacman doesn't make sense outside of its usual classic maze format

The harsh reality is, Sonic doesn't work outside of the Mega Drive. It was made solely to show the Mega Drive's capabilities and because of that, as soon as the Mega Drive ended, so did Sonic. Sega should focus on their other franchises and release fewer but better titles.
 

RevPokemon

GBATemp's 3rd Favorite Transgirl
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
4,839
Trophies
0
Age
27
Location
Fort Gay, West Virginia
XP
2,300
Country
United States
A journalist has studied journalism. A blogger can be anyone.
I know but what I was meaning was video game journalism is way behind other forms of journalism (general,medical,scientific and what not) and like wise the whole blogging community of gamers isn't as professional as the general blogging community is as a whole.
 

VinsCool

Persona Secretiva Felineus
Global Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
14,600
Trophies
4
Location
Another World
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
25,217
Country
Canada
Nope it is independent but did realse the orginal game with Sega as a deal (also released mad world)

Another Gem! Well maybe you are right. As a nintendo fanboy I have my opinions. I would like to see SEGA merging with nintendo and both having thier best like they had from 90's, but in a team work!
 

netovsk

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
1,026
Trophies
0
XP
736
Country
Brazil
No much point buying a franchise when you can just start over a new one with a much better roi.

At least not the ones sega have.
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,348
Country
United States
For many years now, gaming journalism is a joke and their ratings irrelevant. I believe everyone and their dog know that GTA is overrated by now... Actually, you will find a version of it (or the series as a whole) in most "overrated" lists online.

As for the second part, i agree. Even though i prefer Strategy, RPG, and SRPG games in general, i tend to like new experiences. And i agree about the Wii U, that is why i haven't bought it either. But Nintendo doesn't own only the Wii U...

Your original comment was about "only 4 noteworthy games" per year, which is not true. First you need to define "noteworthy". If by this term you mean 90+ metacritic score games, then direct me to the other consoles' 4 noteworthy games per year. Actually, let's talk about AAA companies, and show me their 4 noteworthy 90+ games per year... Especially 2014...

If you mean avg 70+ score, which means "above average games", then Nintendo has them in spades. You may not like them, and that's ok, but Nintendo does publish enough games each year. I believe they have the most quality exclusives each year by far. E.g. you may not like Mario Golf for the 3DS, but you can't say with a straight face that for those who like golf games, its not a noteworthy game...


You can't deny that a game like GTA is a game made with quality. Maybe it's not up your alley, sure, but it's sharpened to a point. It has large, detailed worlds, lengthy narratives, impressive graphics, a large soundtrack, extensive voice work, and the list goes on. You may not like GTA but to say it's bad when game media (as much of a joke as it is) and users alike have highly praised the game and bought and played it in droves, you can't just push your personal opinion without any factual basis.

My point is that, at least with the Wii U, Nintendo's release schedule is embarrassing. Without third parties, it gets barebone releases every year. The Wii U had maybe, what, 10 games at most that were of importance last year? I mean anything past this is scraping the bottom of the barrel. I'm talking like Mario Kart 8, Super Smash Bros., Bayonetta 2, and was there anything else? The PS4 is at least getting 10 games by the first quarter of worth.

A single company rarely produces 10 noteworthy games a year, but systems are made by a combination of companies. Sony will pump out their own games, sure, but that's not nearly enough. That's why they have third parties to fill in gaps.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nah, a hit gives them mad meth powers, but makes them more difficult to control.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Before a hit they're like zombies, persistent but slow.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's a tradeoff.
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    no i mean, before a hit is after the previous hit
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    if you keep them well enough fed, it's the same thing
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    By the power of Florida Man, I have the power!!! *Lifts up meth pipe* Meth Man!!! lol
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Guys, I just learned my little brother is in the hospital because he had a seizure last night.
  • cearp @ cearp:
    Sorry to hear that BakerMan
    +2
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Just found out he's doing alright, doing a lot of complaining too, rightfully so. Who wouldn't complain after having a seizure and being hospitalized?
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Glad he is OK and complaining is cool :)
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Yeah been there had that no fun
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    They'll give him sleep studies eegs and possibly one week hospital stay
    +1
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    I hope it's not a week.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    It's standard so doctors can get a idea about what's going on
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    understood
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    well, i'm glad he seems to be doing fine, and ig i'm going to start spewing goofy shit again
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Update: Turns out he's epileptic
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Get a 2nd opinion run mris etc they told me that also
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Also a food allergy study would be a good idea
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Turns out you can't sprinkle methamphetamine on McDonald's French fries
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    they wouldn't be called french fries at that point
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    Probably just meth fries
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    White fries hold up
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: White fries hold up