Honest question: are you a parent?
No, I'm not, but I don't think that disqualifies my opinion right off the bat. Some things are just common sense.
As someone who is, and who has also been somewhat mischievous as a child I can tell you that some kids will just find a way to do what they want to do. Curiosity drives them it's not difficult to get around parental controls and the like. It's not always about negligence either some people prefer to actually spend quality time with their children when they can,
and let the kids play video games while they're busy doing chores or cooking or whatever. I can partially sympathise: last place you'd expect this kind of thing is on your kid's "game boy". Of course, as a parent I take plenty of preventative measures, but I remember being a child myself and I did plenty of things (not like this, mind you) that my parents would not have been happy about.
In the context of the article we were discussing, what you're saying is that childhood curiosity alone allows a child to rent a room with two middle-ages strangers, but of course I get your point.
This is clearly a criminal case -
a lot has gone wrong, both on the parent's end and on the hotel staff's end
(I mean, two middle-aged guys and a kid renting a room for three? And nobody thought this looks a wee (or "wii" ) bit supicious?), Nintento's service was merely a communication medium.
As for
"getting around parental controls", it's not really that simple these days, not to mention that
"parental control" goes beyond the level of software. Utilizing software alone is, again, treating a machine as a baby sitter - parents should express interest in what their kids are doing online, not just artificially restrict them. Naturally I get your point though - being curios is a big part of being human.
I also haven't seen anybody blaming Nintendo. I think if that were the case, we would have heard about all this before the service was shut down. They took a course of action they deemed appropriate, I don't see any evidence of them being pressured into it. This isn't taking a feature away either, it's retiring a service. Features are implicitly permanent, services are not. Just like how your email provider can shut down at any moment.
Honestly, I think Nintendo was trying to save face before that even happens - it's peer pressure more than anything.
Look at your signature. You and millions of people just list their friend code and add anyone who gives them theirs.
I just wanted to address this part of your post since the rest was addressed by Haggis.
This is exactly why parents should have at least this much
*uses thumb and pointing finger* interest in what their children are doing online, how are they sharing their personal information and with whom. A big part of being a parent is having to
"give a f*ck" about your children.
Perhaps children
shouldn't share
friend codes with people who are not their
friends - I know, the concept is mindblowing.