How can I be biased if I have played Pokemon and enjoy it? In fact wouldn't that lead me to biased in favor of the games? Perhaps you don't understand how biases work.
I'm completely blank on Pokemon. It was part of my childhood but I don't stroke my hard penis over nostalgia. I view it through a completely unfiltered lens. I see it for its strengths and weaknesses, and if you care to research my thoughts on the series, you'll see it acknowledges a lot of pros and cons with it. I'm not biased against the game, my knowledge of narrative tells me that the game has a bad story with bad characters and my knowledge as a gamer tells me that it breaks the flow of the game and is interrupting.
Right now I'm seeing more bias on your end with the "you don't understand" argument seeming like something I've been told by furries, bronies, or insert generic fangroup here of things I don't like. Fact is, for Pokemon especially, I do understand, and I understand it's bad.
I say N is a "dumb character for dumb masses" because he was engineered for target audience appeal. His cornball writing, spiky hairstyle, and demeanor feels like Sonic the Hedgehog mentality. Where all the characters are terrible, cheesy, cardboard cut outs but somehow gain appeal with their fanbase. He's the perfect "make me an avatar/signature" material. In that respect, N is a well designed character. He's designed well at appealing to the fanbase, but the fanbase for Pokemon doesn't strike me as smart or in tune with narrative storytelling or character design.
