you guys had mentioned at one point that this would enable the ability to install legit cia files. how is this done? would you need to be able to run a version of dev menu which in itself isnt a legit cia file. lol im just way too curious about how this is all gna work.
you guys had mentioned at one point that this would enable the ability to install legit cia files. how is this done? wouldn't you need to be able to run a version of dev menu which in itself isnt a legit cia file. lol im just way too curious about how this is all gna work.
Basically what WulfyStylez said, I tried out Big Red Menu just as a test and it could view all the currently installed apps. Didn't install anything because we didn't have emuNAND and it's fairly risky without that, but it's just another service call and as long as the .cia is signed the system will accept it.
I think they already mentioned they would take a look at the possibility to install Homebrew CIAs, since blargSNES and the other emus are homebrew apps.ok i think that kinda makes sense. thanks for explaining guys. shits pretty interesting.
so basically you tell the cfw that it can only install legit cia but then you make exceptions for things like big red menu and savdatafiler? my thought was its an all or nothing kind of deal.
if you are able to make exceptions for certain cia files do you plan on making an exception for the cia version of blargsnes or other homebrew for that matter? that would be nifty,
ok i think that kinda makes sense. thanks for explaining guys. shits pretty interesting.
so basically you tell the cfw that it can only install legit cia but then you make exceptions for things like big red menu and savdatafiler? my thought was its an all or nothing kind of deal.
if you are able to make exceptions for certain cia files do you plan on making an exception for the cia version of blargsnes or other homebrew for that matter? that would be nifty,
I'm gonna take the low road for a second here.I'm being as kind as possible about this.
The developers of this project want to see if they can design a loader for legally owned games.
It's a worthwhile project.
Meanwhile people want to create a quagmire of infighting because they don't agree with the project because it's either too piratey...or not pirate enough... for their liking.
How about we back off and let them see what they're capable of?
They already said they're not blocking Sky.Why would you want to block my Sky3DS!
It takes more programming to block Sky3DS and more programming to enable Gateway.
Why don't you just leave it as a nice clean EmuNAND so we can all play without too much fuss.
Why would you want to block my Sky3DS!
It takes more programming to block Sky3DS and more programming to enable Gateway.
Why don't you just leave it as a nice clean EmuNAND so we can all play without too much fuss.
Why would you want to block my Sky3DS!
It takes more programming to block Sky3DS and more programming to enable Gateway.
Why don't you just leave it as a nice clean EmuNAND so we can all play without too much fuss.
Learn to read...
Sorry Tony didn't mean to piss you off... 1800 posts and I missed one!
I only joined today and this is how you treat people. NICE!