Hacking Wii Hard drive iso loader in action

MeowMix

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
47
Trophies
0
XP
-9
Country
Last thing on my mind = Harddrive + 2.0 DRIVERS.

Ideas.

1. Code IOS Patch for driver 2.0
2. Lazyily dump a hospital Wii.


two options
 

Rocco Savadgie

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
154
Trophies
0
XP
288
Country

xergal

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
64
Trophies
0
XP
103
Country
Arakon said:
considering the dev units have an internal HDD, it would cost nintendo very little more to make a bunch more of those with a custom IPL.


Erm....no they don't. I'd like to know where you get your information from:P

The Wii dev units have no optical drive and don't even look like a Wii. They look like an old C.B powerpack, huge and black. THey have three USB 2.0 ports which is used for connecting to the Dev's PC, which in turn allows them to load their "ISO" streamed from their computer.

I can add a pic of an NDEV if you really want, but it'll scar your retina...it's bloody ugly.
 

Arakon

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
447
Trophies
1
XP
1,061
Country
Gambia, The
xergal said:
Arakon said:
considering the dev units have an internal HDD, it would cost nintendo very little more to make a bunch more of those with a custom IPL.


Erm....no they don't. I'd like to know where you get your information from:P

The Wii dev units have no optical drive and don't even look like a Wii. They look like an old C.B powerpack, huge and black. THey have three USB 2.0 ports which is used for connecting to the Dev's PC, which in turn allows them to load their "ISO" streamed from their computer.

I can add a pic of an NDEV if you really want, but it'll scar your retina...it's bloody ugly.

I'm talking about the test units, not the main dev stations.
Which have a USB port too, btw.. for installation to the HDD.
 

Volkov

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
332
Trophies
0
XP
219
Country
Vater Unser said:
menkros said:
Well I've seen it in action. When you turn it on it goes straight to a custom ipod style menu with pics of the full games. It has 20 of them from mario galaxy to mario kart all full games. All I could tell hardware wise was a white hard drive attached to wii usb drive.
here's the info:

$4,250 which includes the cost of the unit, all taxes, shipping and administration, and repair and maintenance for the life of the Fun Center
Four fucking thousand dollars?
blink.gif


Wii: $250
20 Games:
 

doslu

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
30
Trophies
0
XP
34
Country
France
i read that in the readme of new Mplayerv0.06

-v0.06 (10/03/08):
-huge speedup on USB devices (thanks to rodries and Hermes)

very gooooooood
 

Slowking

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
1,403
Trophies
0
XP
260
Country
Germany
elfsander said:
The Wii USB ports ARE 2.0. It's the simple fact that the Wii software doesn't know how to handle USB 2.0 devices yet, which disables us from using USB 2.0 transfer speed. USB 2.0 only devices are working on the Wii, and test the speed of the LAN adapter (on local servers) shows that infact it's using LAN speed. Which is more than USB 1.1.
Sorry but I really can't believe this. As you said yourself, the USB-ports are currently locked at the speed of USB 1.1 through the IOS, wether they are capable of more or not. Can you show me some proof, that you transfered date at 100Mbps from or to the Wii?
And why are you so sure that the hardware can handle 2.0?

Btw. are there even USB 2.0 only devices. I allways thought backwards compatibility is one of the key-features of USB...

QUOTE(doslu @ Oct 4 2008, 04:38 PM) i read that in the readme of new Mplayerv0.06

-v0.06 (10/03/08):
-huge speedup on USB devices (thanks to rodries and Hermes)

very gooooooood
Probably just means that they are now utelizing the full speed of USB 1.1. 16Mbps are more than enough for SD-Movies.
 

Foppzter

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
754
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
114
Country
With todays technology, it would almost cost more to produce USB 1.1 ports than USB 2.0 ports.
So it is probably USB 2.0 ports locked to 1.1 with some firmware somewhere.
 

SpongeFreak52

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
414
Trophies
0
Location
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe
XP
1,027
Country
United States
I can see why they would have done that too. Nintendo probably only meant the USB ports to be used for the LAN adapter. Since the wireless B chip in the Wii can only allow 11 Mbps, there wouldn't be much need for anything faster in the USB ports.

Not sure why they would have capped it at 1.1 speeds though. It's almost as if they knew it would be utilized for ISO loading.
tongue.gif
 

Zerxer

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
110
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
Pennsylvania
Website
www.sitexero.net
XP
92
Country
United States
SpongeFreak52 said:
Not sure why they would have capped it at 1.1 speeds though. It's almost as if they knew it would be utilized for ISO loading.
tongue.gif
Of course. Probably why they also didn't just add in support for SDHC; didn't want us putting full games on an SDHC card and playing through there (if that would even be fast enough?).
 

SpongeFreak52

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
414
Trophies
0
Location
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe
XP
1,027
Country
United States
Haha, very likely, although it is a major pain waiting for your Channels to backup onto the SD card. @_@

Come to think of it, other than it's internals, the Wii is quite the crappy device to be used for anything process intensive. WLAN-B, USB 1.1 speeds, low SD speeds...dang.
 

Foppzter

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
754
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
114
Country
The reason you see low SD writing/reading speeds is because the system encrypts/decrypts the file(s).
Do we know how fast the reader really is?
What game have the biggest unprotected savefile so we can start copying it and see how fast it is.
 

Slowking

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
1,403
Trophies
0
XP
260
Country
Germany
Foppzter said:
With todays technology, it would almost cost more to produce USB 1.1 ports than USB 2.0 ports.
So it is probably USB 2.0 ports locked to 1.1 with some firmware somewhere.
I agree. It's probably 2.0. I'm just saying, that you can't just assume it is. It could very well be 1.1 and everyone would be disappointed....
 

richy

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
97
Trophies
1
XP
225
Country
OK, so maybe there's newer topics about the Starlight than this one but up until yesterday I'd never heard of it. Surely now that we've got a working hard drive loader of our very own we NEED to get a front end like this baby!
smile.gif


Maybe someone who works at a hospital can just "accidentally" dump some files off one or something? Yeah, ok... but I can dream, can't I?
wink.gif
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: https://youtu.be/zzu0VHzy7tU?si=V2sI-JSptJg0SWmC