• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

What Went Down During Trump's Meeting With The Video Game Industry

trump insta.JPG

In case you were not aware, on Thursday President Donald Trump had an hour-long meeting with Congressional leaders and video game industry leaders behind closed doors in the Roosevelt Room at the White House. Attendees included company representatives from Bethesda, Take-Two, Rockstar, and the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), as well as critics of violent media from the Parents Television Council (PTC), Media Research Council (MRC), Representative Vicky Hartzler, a Republican Congresswoman from Missouri, among others. The meeting, which the White House describes as one of many with the game industry and other stakeholders in a national discussion surrounding school shootings, was closed to the press. However, some of the attendees revealed what went down in post-meeting statements and press interviews.

The meeting kicked-off with the screening of the following 88-second video that depicts violent scenes from game franchises like Call of Duty, Sniper Elite, and Fallout:


Unlisted video from The White House’s YouTube channel


Following the footage Rep. Hartzler said that the president would ask, “This is violent isn’t it?”, asking for comments and thoughts among those present.

"I think for many of us there, there was a shocked silence," Melissa Henson, a spokesperson for the PTC, said during a press call following the meeting. "Those from the video game industry were quick to defend [the video games] saying they were meant for a mature audience and that they weren't intended for kids to see."

“I think he’s deeply disturbed by some of the things you see in these video games that are so darn violent, viciously violent, and clearly inappropriate for children, and I think he’s bothered by that,” said Brent Bozell of the MRC.

In a press statement following the meeting, the White House added that “the President acknowledged some studies have indicated there is a correlation between video game violence and real violence. The conversation centered on whether violent video games, including games that graphically simulate killing, desensitize our community to violence.”

It is not the first time that President Trump made a connection between violence in video games and real violence. He has been quite vocal about his thoughts on the matter in the past...


... even if studies showed no correlation between the two, as the ESA pointed out: "We discussed the numerous scientific studies establishing that there is no connection between video games and violence, First Amendment protection of video games, and how our industry’s rating system effectively helps parents make informed entertainment choices."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who was also at the meeting, also acknowledged that there is no evidence linking violent video games to the tragedy in Parkland. But he said he wanted to ensure “parents are aware of the resources available to them to monitor and control the entertainment their children are exposed to.”

"The tone of the meeting was that it was for information gathering, fact finding," the PTC's Melissa Henson said. "I don't believe anyone came in there with a policy outcome in mind. The President was not walking in there with his mind already made up. I am under the impression there will be future conversations, though no next steps were discussed."
___________________________________________​

While nothing consequential went down during this specific meeting, similar ones are bound to happen, especially in the wake of increasing reports of public violence. Decisions might then be made that will have a heavy impact on the video game industry.

Views are highly divided regarding the issue of violence and video games. This will probably remain the case in the foreseeable future until a consensus is met, however unlikely that may be. But what do you think? Is there a correlation? Are there any changes that need to be made within the video game industry that can help to curb real-world violence?

rsz_trump_video_games_meeting.jpg
 

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
31,284
Trophies
2
Age
38
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,969
Country
United States
If parents weren't stupid and didnt let there 8 year old kid play GTA this wouldn't be a problem.

Whether or not parents aren't be responsible, the government has no right (or any government) to parent children for them. It's not their job to control what other people do, it's just an excuse to let people not be responsible.
 

Old

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Messages
346
Trophies
0
Age
49
XP
523
Country
United States
The real answer is bad parenting when it comes to any type of violence being consumed by children. Whether its through video games, movies, TV, internet, etc... If for some reason they censor all of the violence by these media types, what happens? Everyone just behaves and doesn't make poor decisions? The parents should be held accountable along with the children that commit these terrible acts of violence.

Parenting/guidance is the answer. But, nope, we're instead offered brilliant gems of wisdom such as: "B-b-BUt MoR gUNz n skOOl GUD! giEv TAehCRS GNZZ!!!"

Tragically, creatures like the dotard & the G(L)OP are greedy vampiric monsters that exist solely to accumulate $$$ and leech souls. It's only gotten worse post-Nixon, to the point where most of 'em will now FLAGRANTLY boast of their evil acts, publicly. Paul Ryan? The evil tortoise Mitch? 'Pedo Roy' Moore? Guess what, Millennials and Gen Z -- these Putin drones/wicked bastards don't give a SHIT about you. You're merely the next generations of cattle for them to feed on, for as long as they remain in 'power'....
 

RivenMain

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Messages
228
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
1,057
Country
United States
To the people defending the industry, realize that children's minds are not developed. With the development of VR and everything feeling real in our minds like we are inside the game consider the outcome of children that have access to this. Don't think just of your own selves. For me I see it as demented. I remember a few gta kids at my school and they shared anger issues like the world hated them. Us killing in game may dwell the pain of life, but to some it's not enough.
I'm sure a majority of gamers have at some point been effected by a game or tv show. Wanting to be that character or portray them in someway. The same exists in violent games. There's a reason old folks may see shooting games as a incentive for joining the army etc. And there's probably some truth within it.
 

Navonod

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
601
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
1,536
Country
United States
Till the day comes that we get robots that are allowed to shoot bullets
You think our brightest minds would give robots guns? I can see a possible military use but I highly doubt that's something we have to worry about. And even then it's the robot killing with a weapon. Not a gun shooting people on it's own.
 

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
31,284
Trophies
2
Age
38
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,969
Country
United States
No. People kill people. A gun can't get up on it's own and shoot someone. Just like a fork can't get up and make someone overweight.

Guns killing people is the stupidest argument I've ever heard against them. Know what else can be used to kill people? Knifes, improvised explosive devices, C-4, cars, so why don't we ban those next? Or better yet, we can always ban people :lol:
 

Navonod

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
601
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
1,536
Country
United States
Guns killing people is the stupidest argument I've ever heard against them. Know what else can be used to kill people? Knifes, improvised explosive devices, C-4, cars, so why don't we ban those next? Or better yet, we can always ban people :lol:
I know right? People are dumb.
 

Navonod

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
601
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
1,536
Country
United States
To the people defending the industry, realize that children's minds are not developed. With the development of VR and everything feeling real in our minds like we are inside the game consider the outcome of children that have access to this. Don't think just of your own selves. For me I see it as demented. I remember a few gta kids at my school and they shared anger issues like the world hated them. Us killing in game may dwell the pain of life, but to some it's not enough.
I'm sure a majority of gamers have at some point been effected by a game or tv show. Wanting to be that character or portray them in someway. The same exists in violent games. There's a reason old folks may see shooting games as a incentive for joining the army etc. And there's probably some truth within it.
That's why parents shouldn't let their kids play such video games. It's the parents fault for not doing research on a video game like they should.
 

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,569
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,766
Country
United States
whats next? banning Pokemon cause it teaches animal fighting while winning bets (oh wa-.......) (trying to be ironicly funny here not serious)

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

That's why parents shouldn't let their kids play such video games. It's the parents fault for not doing research on a video game like they should.

exactly maybe trump should work on those damn loot crates but he won't cause it geneates money for capitalism :(
 

Navonod

Luigi from Luigi's Mansion
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
601
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
1,536
Country
United States
whats next? banning Pokemon cause it teaches animal fighting while winning bets (oh wa-.......) (trying to be ironicly funny here not serious)
I've always seen Pokemon as a more violent dog fight. But the cartoon down plays it as friendship and happiness in fairy tail land. Great games though. :)
 

jt_1258

Ella
Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
3,053
Trophies
2
Age
24
XP
4,885
Country
United States

RivenMain

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Messages
228
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
1,057
Country
United States
That's why parents shouldn't let their kids play such video games. It's the parents fault for not doing research on a video game like they should.
It's not are they allowed, if you tell a kid not to do something it's just gonna make them curious why not. And like Lion king if it isn't thorough they'll do it. if it's late night x files well your sleeping. Or closing their web browser when you walk into the room. They'll find a way the importance is making it harder for those children to have access in the beginning. Passwords waking a computer, high shelves.

When I learned how to delete my browsing history ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) lol
 
Last edited by RivenMain,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYZD7ykz9aQ