What happend to science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter antonkan
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 1,711
  • Replies Replies 12
Status
Not open for further replies.

antonkan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
9
Trophies
1
Age
30
Location
Burlington, ON
Website
Visit site
XP
354
Country
Canada
Here's my question about the former staff, science:[*]Why science became a Member group from the Magazine Staff group?[*]Does science doesn't go to GBAtemp anymore? Why?Please don't move and close this topic, staff members of GBAtemp.

Thanks.
 
1. science had balls, massive ones might I add. The GBAtemp staff had a choice: let science become part of the Magizine Staff, or suffer the fate of being crushed by his gigantic balls.

2. He had a sex change, losing his boulders in the process. This rendered him harmless and powerless.
 
Sonicslasher said:
1. science had balls, massive ones might I add. The GBAtemp staff had a choice: let science become part of the Magizine Staff or suffer the fate of being crushed by his gigantic balls.

2. He had a sex change, losing his boulders in the process.

this pretty much sums it up.

though seriously, him (and a lot of other users) simply don't come to this site as frequently anymore.
 
I think it would be a good idea if we could block Antonkan from making topics in the Site discussions section.
 
Sonicslasher said:
1. science had balls, massive ones might I add. The GBAtemp staff had a choice: let science become part of the Magizine Staff, or suffer the fate of being crushed by his gigantic balls.

2. He had a sex change, losing his boulders in the process. This rendered him harmless and powerless.
No, I said why science became a Member group now.
 
antonkan said:
Sonicslasher said:
1. science had balls, massive ones might I add. The GBAtemp staff had a choice: let science become part of the Magazine Staff, or suffer the fate of being crushed by his gigantic balls.

2. He had a sex change, losing his boulders in the process. This rendered him harmless and powerless.
No, I said why science became a Member group now.
Oh sorry. I thought you were asking why science became a part of the Magazine Staff
 
antonkan said:
Please don't move this topic, staff members of GBAtemp.

What would make you assume that this thread would be moved? (and why do you say this frequently?) With all due respect, you pleading with us not to do so will not affect our decision (i.e. if there was a good reason for it to be moved).


antonkan said:
[*]Why science became a Member group from the Magazine Staff group?

Because he resigned - the gist of his reasons being that he's been occupied with other things ILR (or rather, away from the internet) so in doing so was aware that wasn't able to put the time/effort into doing his "job". Which isn't unusual.


QUOTE(antonkan @ Sep 2 2009, 02:46 AM)
[*]Does science doesn't go to GBAtemp anymore? Why?

My last message pretty much answers this, if you want more info I suggest you send him a PM, there was no mention of him leaving the site (permanently).
 
dice said:
antonkan said:
Please don't move this topic, staff members of GBAtemp.

What would make you assume that this thread would be moved? (and why do you say this frequently?) With all due respect, you pleading with us not to do so will not affect our decision (i.e. if there was a good reason for it to be moved).


antonkan said:
[*]Why science became a Member group from the Magazine Staff group?

Because he resigned - the gist of his reasons being that he's been occupied with other things ILR (or rather, away from the internet) so in doing so was aware that wasn't able to put the time/effort into doing his "job". Which isn't unusual.


QUOTE(antonkan @ Sep 2 2009, 02:46 AM)
[*]Does science doesn't go to GBAtemp anymore? Why?

My last message pretty much answers this, if you want more info I suggest you send him a PM, AFAIK he hasn't left the forums (permanently).
Thanks for the info.
 
^ You're right about this site being slow. It lags for me and I have 15M internet. Of course, paying for a faster connection for the server would cost alot.

Sorry if I sound like I'm hijacking the thread.
 
p1ngpong said:
I think it would be a good idea if we could block Antonkan from making topics in the Site discussions section.
+1

The shoutbox is good to get answers without taking forum space.

And now to just place this down...

lock2.gif


And before you make a topic asking why this was closed, your question was answered so the thread was over and done with. The shoutbox is good to get answers without taking forum sapce.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum