Hardware VGA vs Component cable?

OGTiago

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
244
Trophies
0
Age
112
Location
London, England Rank: Temp God
Website
google.pt
XP
223
Country
Right now I have a component cable, but I didn't notice a big difference from composite, except slightly crisp and defined colours, which just comes out as super jaggies on my HD TV.

Anyone used the two, did you notice a difference?
 

PsyBlade

Snake Charmer
Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
2,204
Trophies
0
Location
Sol III
XP
458
Country
Gambia, The
There are only Composite(1 Channel), SVideo (over Scart)(2C) and Component(3C) Cables for Wii.

in general: more Channels -> better Picture

Everything else just converts one of the above.
 

Raiser

I am mad scientist.
Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,563
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
636
Country
Canada
I think he has his terms mixed up (VGA and Composite).
FYI: VGA is the blue headed cable that a lot of computer monitors use. Composite are the standard red, yellow, and white headed cables that many TV connected electronic devices use.

Composite will have a more dull color and clarity presentation.
Component really shows off the colors and improves the Wii's clarity which is why jagged lines are much more visible.

So with each cable, there's a con. Which one is more suited for you depends on your TV / setup.
 

d820wii

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
2
Trophies
0
XP
5
Country
United States
i can tell a a lil' bit of a diff. another thing that Component (RBG) conn. made my WiiSprtResPAL funcnl and a few other titles that with reg yellRedWt conn will not disp. I think there's an Advantg havn Component.Thanx
 

OGTiago

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
244
Trophies
0
Age
112
Location
London, England Rank: Temp God
Website
google.pt
XP
223
Country
Raiser said:
I think he has his terms mixed up (VGA and Composite).
FYI: VGA is the blue headed cable that a lot of computer monitors use. Composite are the standard red, yellow, and white headed cables that many TV connected electronic devices use.

Composite will have a more dull color and clarity presentation.
Component really shows off the colors and improves the Wii's clarity which is why jagged lines are much more visible.

So with each cable, there's a con. Which one is more suited for you depends on your TV / setup.
No mix up, maybe confusing as I end up talking about composite too, but the question is related to VGA and component.
 

mightymuffy

fatbaldpieeater
Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
1,983
Trophies
3
Age
48
Location
Land o't pies
XP
3,273
Country
United Kingdom
OGTiago said:
No mix up, maybe confusing as I end up talking about composite too, but the question is related to VGA and component.

Right.... I'm guessing you can get a vga cable for the Wii then? .....the picture quality will at best be no better than component: the Wii can't display a higher resolution than 480p...
 

Raiser

I am mad scientist.
Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,563
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
636
Country
Canada
There wouldn't be much difference, if any at all.

There is no direct cable to VGA for the Wii. That's why if you look at the link that Arm73 posted, you'll find a couple items used such as HDBox Pro or Wii2HDMI.

They are cheap converter devices that would allow you to convert a composite / component signal into VGA. Often, there are problems such as color loss, quality loss, sound issues, and many others.

Are you looking to use your Wii on a TV or PC monitor?
 

Edgedancer

Director of Moon based operations
Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
2,633
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
Canberra
Website
Visit site
XP
504
Country
Actually Raiser, there is a VGA cable for the wii. I actually own one but there are issues with it. The monitor only accepts 480p (or which ever one is the higher quality output) and the wii will occassionally output the lower quality signal and this results in a black screen that can last a couple of seconds to well over a minute (in twilight princess at least) which makes some games unplayable. And some games dont work at all, like Madworld. There is also the issue of PAL wii's not be able to make use of the gamecube function with the vga cable and even on NTSC ones, it is still hit'n'miss.
 

OGTiago

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
244
Trophies
0
Age
112
Location
London, England Rank: Temp God
Website
google.pt
XP
223
Country
Raiser said:
There wouldn't be much difference, if any at all.

There is no direct cable to VGA for the Wii. That's why if you look at the link that Arm73 posted, you'll find a couple items used such as HDBox Pro or Wii2HDMI.

They are cheap converter devices that would allow you to convert a composite / component signal into VGA. Often, there are problems such as color loss, quality loss, sound issues, and many others.

Are you looking to use your Wii on a TV or PC monitor?
They call it a TV, but it's just a giant LCD monitor.

Right, so what if the TV was better at displaying VGA? Or wouldn't there be a difference because it's just converting? From what you guys have said it doesn't seem worth getting a VGA cable with all the problems.
 

Raiser

I am mad scientist.
Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,563
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
636
Country
Canada
Edgedancer said:
Actually Raiser, there is a VGA cable for the wii. I actually own one but there are issues with it. The monitor only accepts 480p (or which ever one is the higher quality output) and the wii will occassionally output the lower quality signal and this results in a black screen that can last a couple of seconds to well over a minute (in twilight princess at least) which makes some games unplayable. And some games dont work at all, like Madworld. There is also the issue of PAL wii's not be able to make use of the gamecube function with the vga cable and even on NTSC ones, it is still hit'n'miss.
If you mean those cables with the green video head (that you plug in to a TV for a few second to configure settings), those are just as PsyBlade says- a converter and component cable in one.

QUOTE(OGTiago @ Sep 9 2010, 05:40 AM) They call it a TV, but it's just a giant LCD monitor.

Right, so what if the TV was better at displaying VGA? Or wouldn't there be a difference because it's just converting? From what you guys have said it doesn't seem worth getting a VGA cable with all the problems.
There are no brand name converters (at all) that will allow you to convert your signal to VGA.
You'll most likely find at least a few problems with each converter. So in the end, it'd be better sticking with component (or composite if you prefer it).
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
VGA is miles better. Stick a HDMI converter in the mix and you've got a bomb.
 

Edgedancer

Director of Moon based operations
Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
2,633
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
Canberra
Website
Visit site
XP
504
Country
Sorry about that misinformation guys. It plugs into the monitor so thats good enough for me.
tongue.gif
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: @salazarcosplay, gta v is down since november 2021