- Joined
- Sep 23, 2010
- Messages
- 1,827
- Reaction score
- 838
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 37
- Website
- www.lvlupart.com
- XP
- 1,249
- Country



You mean the kickass Zelda who helps slay Ganon? And just because a spiked turtle 3 times your size captures you, that doesn't mean you're "helpless". Pretty sure you couldn't take on Bowser.
Also, Samus anyone?

Meh, just because she's not always successful against someone with overwhelming power doesn't make her helpless. Even if it did, she would still be stronger than everyone (except Link) in all of Hyrule, since she has some success.Zelda also literally became a puppet by Ganon(dorf) in Twilight Princess and she's usually helpless as fuck.
I know you're probably going to dismiss this as a "fanboy's justification", but I didn't find anything wrong with Samus's attitude Other M. It added a "human element" to her. It made perfect sense that she would be terrified at points (you can't tell me you wouldn't be sh*ting your pants), but that never stopped her. The whole point is that she OVERCAME her fear.I'd say Samus... then they wrote Other M and basically ruined any chances of me thinking they were trying for a genuinely strong female protagonist in Samus. Don't say "That was Team Ninja" because it was written by Nintendo.

Meh, just because she's not always successful against someone with overwhelming power doesn't make her helpless. Even if it did, she would still be stronger than everyone (except Link) in all of Hyrule, since she has some success.
I know you're probably going to dismiss this as a "fanboy's justification", but I didn't find anything wrong with Samus's attitude Other M. It added a "human element" to her. It made perfect sense that she would be terrified at points (you can't tell me you wouldn't be sh*ting your pants), but that never stopped her. The whole point is that she OVERCAME her fear.
It made perfect sense that she would be especially scared of Ridley. I'm sure most people haven't read the manga (it's the only manga I've ever read), but it adds a lot of explanation to her reaction. Ridely killed her parents when she was a little girl. That's why it kept showing her as a child, it was PTSD. She finally thought she was safe from him, and he comes back to kill her. She'd have to be an emotionless drone not to be terrified. It's how I always image heroes, male or female, reacting to such things.
That being said, Nintendo was largely to blame. They expected you to know the back story of a Japanese comic, instead of explaining it in the game.

See, that's the point people are missing. Up until MIt makes no sense of her to be scared of Ridley when she fights him in MULTIPLE GAMES BEFORE OTHER M with absolutely zero fucks given.
It makes no sense of her to be scared of Ridley when she fights him in MULTIPLE GAMES BEFORE OTHER M with absolutely zero fucks given.


Uh...yes they are. They are created by Nintendo.Also: The Prime games are NOT canon. So basically she fought him TWICE and only killed him ONCE. Sakamoto stated as much. And as badly written MOM was (and it is a badly written, misogynistic crapfest of a story) Sakamoto at least tried to tighten the Series up.

Uh...yes they are. They are created by Nintendo.
But like I said, the point is she overcame her (logical) fear. That's far more than you could expect from any average person.
And to add to that statement, they don't treat their devteams that nicely either.I really want to like Ubisoft, they make lovely games. It's just their treatment of paying customers I really couldn't care less for.
Plus Other M was meant as a prequel to the whole metroid series.
See, that's the point people are missing. Up until MM, you never knew what her reaction was. It's logical that she would be terrified of him, and that she would suffer from PTSD. Did you think she was emotionless? That would make her a psychopath, not a hero.


There is nothing in there about it not being canon. Being its own series (i.e. not directly connected to the other games) is not the same thing as being non-canon (i.e. fan made). Anything licensed by Nintendo is canon.no they are not, they are created by retro and sakamoto and nintendo stated on many occasions that the prime games are NOT canon but their own series. Much like the ultimate marvel universe is not canon to the classic marvel universe.
Official nintendo press release back when MOM was released:
http://gonintendo.com/?p=134762
I think you missed my previous post (read the second to last paragraph if you don't want to read it all) where I explained that. Nintendo is stupid for assuming everyone would understand it though. Most people didn't get that it was her remembering Ridley murdering her parents when she was a little girl.Except there is no reaction. Samus doesn't freeze. Samus doesn't revert to a scared, helpless little girl (also, what the fuck was up with that?).
I think you missed my previous post (read the second to last paragraph if you don't want to read it all) where I explained that. Nintendo is stupid for assuming everyone would understand it though. Most people didn't get that it was her remembering Ridley murdering her parents when she was a little girl.

ShadowSoldier, keeping it classy on the front page as always.If you honestly believe Nintendo is in serious trouble, the WiiU will fail and Nintendo will go software only, slap yourself in the face with a fish dick


And what if Ubisoft said "We're not developing for the WiiU"?
"So? Assassin's Creed III sucked on the WiiU, and Rayman is a worse platformer than Mario." - Nintendo fans
THIS thread is a clear example of doublethinking (See George Orwell's 1984). What makes Ubisoft more improtant than EA, software-centric or financially? I would argue it's the other way around, yet Nintendo fans are so quick to dismiss EA as worthless for the WiiU.



