Three Glasses-Less 3DTVs Expected by Toshiba Before Year's End

Terminator02

ヽ( 。 ヮ゚)ノ
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,516
Trophies
1
Location
Somewhere near monkat
XP
1,109
Country
United States
340x_glassesless3dtosh.jpg
Before the end of the year, three 3DTVs from Toshiba not requiring cumbersome glasses to get the full effects are expected, after using something similar to Sharp's parallax barrier tech, as seen in the Nintendo 3DS.

The Japanese publication Yomiuri Shimbun is claiming Toshiba will launch three models before Christmas, using a technology they developed which emits light rays at different angles, meaning glasses aren't required.

Toshiba previously spoke of this technology as being 21-inches in size, with the panel not quite full HD, at 1280 x 800 (WXGA) resolution. Back in April they described the technology as the following:


"The integral imaging system offers a significant reduction in eye fatigue during long periods of viewing, and features a multi-parallax[1] design that enables motion parallax, which cannot be achieved by systems using glasses. The multi-parallax approach results in images that change depending on the viewer's position. In addition, the viewing angle is wide, and the resulting stereoscopic image is natural and smooth. In some previous integral imaging implementations, there have been issues raised relating to the loss of effective image resolution. In previous implementations, if the number of pixels in the display is kept constant and not increased, then the multi-parallax approach will reduce the effective resolution of the 3D display in an inverse proportion to the number of parallax positions. We have addressed this problem by applying LTPS (low-temperature poly-silicon) technology to develop an ultra-high-definition LCD module for this newly-introduced high-definition and large-screen 3D display.
This 21-inch auto-stereoscopic high-definition display adopts a lens sheet to control reduction in surface luminance intensity, resulting in brightness comparable to standard 2D displays. The power consumption of the display is relatively low. The new 21-inch display is considered to be environmentally friendly with low power usage. Furthermore, the display can be used in a vertical or horizontal position. When used in the vertical position, the user faces the upright screen from the front as a person would usually use a 2D monitor. However, when used in the horizontal position, the user overlooks the stereoscopic image formed by the display lying face-up, as one would overlook a relief model. Compared with the front view, the 3D images seen face-up from the bird's eye view are more stereoscopic and realistic."


Three glasses-less 3DTVs before the end of the year, eh Toshiba? Guess we'll be seeing some nice announcements from the Japanese company next week at IFA.[/p]
icon11.gif
Source (Gizmodo)


BTW, it won't let me use my GBAtemp uploaded pix because it says they are dynamic
unsure.gif
, weird
 

cris92x

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
419
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
229
Country
United States
I wonder how this will affect sony's 3d tv sales, I mean they are pricy and they rarely get bought yet sony has been pushing 3D like no tomorrow....
 

YayMii

hi
Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
4,916
Trophies
0
Age
28
Location
that place
XP
758
Country
Canada
Hmm... this sounds good, but I have 1 question: How much is the viewing angle?
If there's a really crappy view angle, then there's not really any point in making the tech into a TV.
 

Slyakin

See ya suckers
Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
4,448
Trophies
0
Age
28
Location
Soviet Slyakin
XP
399
Country
United States
YayMii said:
Hmm... this sounds good, but I have 1 question: How much is the viewing angle?
If there's a really crappy view angle, then there's not really any point in making the tech into a TV.
Yeah, that would suck, like if you had to sit 3 feet away from the TV, forever burning out your eyeballs.
 

Terminator02

ヽ( 。 ヮ゚)ノ
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
4,516
Trophies
1
Location
Somewhere near monkat
XP
1,109
Country
United States
YayMii said:
Hmm... this sounds good, but I have 1 question: How much is the viewing angle?
If there's a really crappy view angle, then there's not really any point in making the tech into a TV.
from my post: "The multi-parallax approach results in images that change depending on the viewer's position. In addition, the viewing angle is wide, and the resulting stereoscopic image is natural and smooth."
 
D

Deleted_171835

Guest
Terminator02 said:
BTW, it won't let me use my GBAtemp uploaded pix because it says they are dynamic
unsure.gif
, weird
Save the image to your desktop.
Then upload it using GBAtemp's picture upload.

--
I'm not interested in this until we have true high-definition (1080p) on a glasses-free 3DTV.
 

Joe88

[λ]
Global Moderator
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
12,738
Trophies
2
Age
36
XP
7,449
Country
United States
cris92x said:
I wonder how this will affect sony's 3d tv sales, I mean they are pricy and they rarely get bought yet sony has been pushing 3D like no tomorrow....
a few things

these tv's can only push out 720p, where as the regular 3d tv's can push out 1080p
right now these are 21in, where as regular 3d tv's there doesnt seem a size restriction
we dont know the price on these yet, regular 3d tv's are expensive to say the least; basically add $1000 to price if you want 3d
and finally these tv can be properly viewed from a certain angle to get the 3d experience, move slightly away from the target zone and the 3d effect is lost, where as regular 3d tv's anyone wearing the active shutter glasses can still have 3d and move around ect...

now its not just sony making 3d tv's
theres samsung, panisonic, lg, and a few others

but if you really care that much about their tv's sales then dont worry
http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2...pecial-glasses/
 
D

Deleted_171835

Guest
Joe88 said:
cris92x said:
I wonder how this will affect sony's 3d tv sales, I mean they are pricy and they rarely get bought yet sony has been pushing 3D like no tomorrow....
a few things
these tv's can only push out 720p, where as the regular 3d tv's can push out 1080p
right now these are 21in, where as regular 3d tv's there doesnt seem a size restriction
we dont know the price on these yet, regular 3d tv's are expensive to say the least; basically add $1000 to price if you want 3d
They display in 768p (1280×800), I think.
21 inches is way too small for a main television, IMO. 32 inches is the minimum for me.
 

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
cris92x said:
I wonder how this will affect sony's 3d tv sales, I mean they are pricy and they rarely get bought yet sony has been pushing 3D like no tomorrow....

It was also revelled a few weeks ago by gizmodo: any tv 120mzh and higher can display 3d with those 3d boxes and glasses.

Yet sony's "3d compatible" tv sales remained the same.
 

Hop2089

Cute>Hot
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
3,812
Trophies
1
Age
37
Website
Visit site
XP
806
Country
United States
Issho ni Bathtime in 3D here I come.

I'll buy one of these and I'm glad I didn't invest in one earlier.

I'll watch it in 3D and may get disappointed then switch it back to 2D and wonder why did I watch it in 3D in the first place.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Lol
  • mthrnite tempBOT: @ mthrnite
    smacks Sicklyboy around a bit with a large leech
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Howdy @mthrnite , great to see you :D
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    hola mi hermano
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @Sicklyboy - the comparison would be forgiving all medical debt, not making healthcare illegal!
  • cearp @ cearp:
    Although I still don't agree, medical debt is rarely a choice, whereas enrolling in university is certainly a choice
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    we need more smart cats tho for reals
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    College costs, college loans, book prices, the entire thing is predatory, oft touted as essential to a successful life for my generation and the ones since, and completely unaffordable without putting you through an insane financial hardship for literal decades in many situations.
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Many of the same issues can be seen for the insanely predatory healthcare and health insurance system in the US
    +1
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    ^this
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    It's important for society to be healthy and educated. If those things can't happen because all of the institutions that prop up those industries make it unattainable for all but a small portion of society, then your society is largely going to be disease ridden, dying, and uneducated in very short order.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Issue is it's too rich of a coperation already with bad sugar diets causing diabetes and killing teeth a new set of teeth around 90k
  • cearp @ cearp:
    I agree it's not easy for the average American, let alone the ones below that average. Free / cheaper healthcare is much more important I think than free university education.
    Of course like @mthrnite said, why not both. But I doubt both will get solved at once, and surely healthcare is top priority.
    +1
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    they go hand in hand unless you want a plumber performing your triple bypass
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Everyone should be Medicaid elegable for implants at the most
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    If it's needed to keep you healthy it shouldn't cost you $90k. The fact that it does is an enormous problem
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    but yeah, affordable is all i'm asking for
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    i'd be happy with affordable dentures
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    With my old dentist he even encouraged switching insurance every quarter
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    And if the concern is that "well we can't trust the government to intervene for this because the government can't do anything right and wastes tons of money" then holy shit push for a better government. I'm certainly trying to. Don't throw your hands up and go "we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas"
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Plus technology cost iirc even a water jet drill is 1k per
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @K3Nv2 that's crazily expensive. how long will that take to pay off?

    Although diet is largely education, people don't need to go to university to learn what's healthy and what's not,
    it's the whole country, big corporations and advertising that is to blame for leading most of the population to believe that poptarts and froot loops are healthy to feed a child
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    i would think the population knows better but with food deserts and abject poverty, sometimes a poptart gonna have to do.
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    it's a big ol complicated world innit
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    As someone who went through the grade school system in the US some time within the past 30 or so years, not nearly enough is done to promote and educate on how to eat healthy in a way that is feasible to do on a regular basis and also affordable. Eating healthy is, comparatively, fucking expensive. So is eating unhealthy, but in many cases eating unhealthy is more affordable than eating healthy
    Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy: As someone who went through the grade school system in the US some time within the past 30 or so...