The U.S. government is seeking a five-year sentence for Team Xecuter's Gary Bowser

unnamed.jpg

In new court documents released yesterday, the U.S. government discussed its desires for sentencing in the case of Gary Bowser, who was the public face of Team Xecuter. The U.S. is recommending sixty months, or five years, of imprisonment for Bowser, a sentence it admits is "greater than the sentence recommended by the Probation Office," and comes on top of the $4.5 million fine he's already accepted after pleading guilty. (That's only for the criminal case brought against him by the U.S. government; in the civil suit against him filed by Nintendo of America, he was recently ordered to pay $10 million.)

The state feels, however, that this sentence is justified due to the due to Bowser's importance in Team Xecuter, his "history and characteristics," and as a proper deterrent against cybercriminal activities. The state points out that Team Xecuter was a highly sophisticated, multinational business that cost the videogame industry between an estimated $65 million and $150 million in damages, and it could not have operated as effectively without Bowser's marketing. They also claim that he has a history of criminality - citing a charge of forgery and fraud under $5000 from 2004 - and that he has a risk of recidivism, given how long he has worked in the criminal space. "After he is released, the same financial hardships and social isolation that led to his becoming the public voice of the Team Xecuter enterprise will be present when he reenters society after serving his sentence," says one section of the document. Finally, they believe that it is a "just punishment" that will help deter other potential cybercriminals, given how difficult it can be to identify or extradite offenders, citing Bowser's own co-defendants in this case, Max Louarn and Yuanning Chen.

Conversely, the defense is requesting a nineteen month sentence, as they believe the prosecution is exaggerating the importance of his role in Team Xecuter, that his character is defensible and that, as a Canadian citizen, he has been and will be treated worse in the American prison system than an American citizen would.

"Mr. Bowser was used by Max Louarn," states the defense plainly near the beginning of the document. They go on to downplay his role in the organization, citing documents provided in discovery and Bowser's plea deal. Team Xecuter “generated at least tens of millions of dollars of proceeds," according to Bowser; however, he believes millions of it "must" have gone to Louarn and Chen, with "the rest" of it going to unindicted developers, manufacturers and resellers of Team Xecuter products, as Bowser was only paid between $500 and $1000 per month by Louarn. He is estimated to have made $320,000 over the course of his seven years with Team Xecuter, including his pay and ad revenue generated from independent resellers, despite assuming the highest risk by marketing these products. In addition to the pay discrepancy, the defense also asserts that while Bowser's role was important, he was not the leader, and that "without Chen or Louarn, there would be no enterprise. But without Mr. Bowser, Louarn would have found someone else to be 'the face' of this effort." The defense also maintains that the sentence is disproportionately harsh compared to similar offenses, citing United States v. Nomm, a case from 2015 regarding the sale of pirated media. Similar to Bowser's case, it regarded one person being indicted for the actions of a piracy group, wherein the defendant pleaded guilty, had been involved with the group roughly as long as Bowser was involved with Team Xecuter, was estimated to have caused $400 million in damages, and generated $150 million in profit, yet was only sentenced to 366 days in prison.

The defense goes on to discusses Bowser's tumultuous and isolating childhood, which they believe led to his love of computers and eventually his criminality. There are also quotes from several friends of Bowser's who defended his character, describing him as a man who “wanted to please people and be liked,” and said they would help him when he is released back to Canada, to help prevent him returning to criminal activity.

Lastly, the defense asserts that concessions should be made for the conditions in which Bowser has been contained, and the difficulties of being a Canadian citizen in the American prison system. Bowser has been detained since October 2, 2020, as "Bowser is a Canadian citizen with no status in the U.S. and no family resources in Canada, it was impossible to achieve his presumptive pretrial release." By the time of sentencing, Bowser will have been detained for sixteen months. The defense argues that, if their nineteen month sentence is granted, he will essentially be serving a thirty-nine month sentence, with the first sixteen already served. Bowser has also spent this time dealing with medical issues, such as an infection of COVID-19 and elephantiasis, contracted in 2018, that necessitates the use of a wheelchair or cane and has been described as a "permanent deform[ity]" by medical records. Despite this, he did not "sit around feeling sorry for himself," and has spent his time in custody reading self-help books and has lost a hundred pounds. They also believe that he is being treated unfairly as a Canadian citizen, as any American would have been released on appearance bond, rather than spending all this time in prison, and likely would have been redirected to a minimum-security camp. His status as a deportable also prevents his inclusion to several early-release programs, such as the Earned Early Release program that the defense believes he would have qualified for due to his self-improvement, or the RDAP substance abuse program, which would he would have qualified for "based on his long-time abuse of alcohol."

A judge will soon make a decision regarding Bowser's sentencing.

:arrow: Source (Application for Commissioner Order)
:arrow: Source (Defendant's Motion)
 

ShadowOne333

QVID PRO QVO
Editorial Team
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
12,197
Trophies
2
XP
33,815
Country
Mexico
Geez Nintendo, fuck off with that absurd sentence.
It won't serve as a precedent at all, hackers gonna hack, and thankfully the US and Japan are not the only shit places with "capable" people.
I fucking dread the time when the "law" systems from these hell holes becomes a thing worldwide.

Fuck off again, Nintendo, just cause.
 

White_Raven_X

Hack everything, hack the world!
Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
628
Trophies
0
Age
45
XP
1,543
Country
Canada
At the end of it all....how is a "normal citizen" supposed to pay $14.5 million dollars to Nintendo unless they intend to do more criminal acts once out of jail. He's not rich and doesn't have"hidden" money somewhere to pay these fines. It's like not giving him any chance to get "clean" and back on his feet. Fuck the government for not offering a better way to "help" or reform people like this. Maybe if he was offered a position with a challenge that would keep his interest and the pay would go towards the fines.
Way to go Government! *Middle finger*
 

ZipMartin

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
92
Trophies
1
XP
982
Country
Brazil
Aren't type and minimum/maximum time of penalty provided and limited by law in the US? After reading this thread it seems like the prosecutors and judges have the power to get creative and free-style on that matter.
 

cashboxz01

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
155
Trophies
1
XP
1,041
Country
United States
The guy caused 2-3mil in damages max. Lets be real:
  • Most of the people who own an SX chip would not have bought most of the games anyway because no one buys shovelware
  • The games worth buying would mostly be bought on sale, or used.
  • Not that many people even have an SX chip installed in their switch. It was never really easy to find the chip or installer. Also most gamers would rather play online than free games offline.
  • Statute of limitations predating the Switch make the other damages pretty irrelevant in this case, so need to be excluded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanIHazWarez

Kioku

猫。子猫です!
Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
12,007
Trophies
3
Location
In the Murderbox!
Website
www.twitch.tv
XP
16,143
Country
United States
The guy caused 2-3mil in damages max. Lets be real:
  • Most of the people who own an SX chip would not have bought most of the games anyway because no one buys shovelware
  • The games worth buying would mostly be bought on sale, or used.
  • Not that many people even have an SX chip installed in their switch. It was never really easy to find the chip or installer. Also most gamers would rather play online than free games offline.
  • Statute of limitations predating the Switch make the other damages pretty irrelevant in this case, so need to be excluded.
When you refer to the exaggerated monetary value as "damages", it's ignorant. You're implying that someone came in and stole $2-3million of products using the SX.
 

cashboxz01

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
155
Trophies
1
XP
1,041
Country
United States
When you refer to the exaggerated monetary value as "damages", it's ignorant. You're implying that someone came in and stole $2-3million of products using the SX.

Quoted from OP:
The state points out that Team Xecuter was a highly sophisticated, multinational business that cost the videogame industry between an estimated $65 million and $150 million in damages

Not my words.

And I'm saying that even if all the people who used SX products actually bought legit games, had there been no SX chip, Nintendo would make $2-3million worth of revenue based off the games those people collectively would have bought. If someone downloads 20 games off tinfoil every year, that doesn't mean they would have bought 20 games every year at $60/game from Walmart.
 
Last edited by cashboxz01,
  • Like
Reactions: CanIHazWarez

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,561
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,742
Country
United States
shoot. they probably would give more if they could, wtf
unnamed-2.jpg
your math is wrong they honestly went OVER the amount maximum set by law (4.5 mil in the federal criminal case) if gary pointed that stipulation out he could get the whole thing thrown out or at least the fine reduced to the maximum ($250,000)
 

linuxares

The inadequate, autocratic beast!
Global Moderator
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
13,303
Trophies
2
XP
18,152
Country
Sweden
The guy caused 2-3mil in damages max. Lets be real:
  • Most of the people who own an SX chip would not have bought most of the games anyway because no one buys shovelware
  • The games worth buying would mostly be bought on sale, or used.
  • Not that many people even have an SX chip installed in their switch. It was never really easy to find the chip or installer. Also most gamers would rather play online than free games offline.
  • Statute of limitations predating the Switch make the other damages pretty irrelevant in this case, so need to be excluded.
I own a sx dongle and I bought Pokemon Legends. This is more than the modchip
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterJ360

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,561
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,742
Country
United States
what actually happens if you can't pay a legal fine (I doubt all his belongings if sold equal that amount) can they force him to get a job or even more jail? getting a job would be extremely hard once you commited a felony so they set you up for failure from the get go
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZipMartin

TheGodMauro

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
70
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
962
Country
Venezuela
I strongly disagree. Why should other companies waste their time, and money, trying to prevent exploitable hardware if the government is going to bail them out with excessive punishments.

Has there been a Nintendo console that hasn't been exploited within a year?

I'm not a huge fan of tax money being used because Nintendo chooses to half ass their designs and they're exploited within six months. Far better uses of the court.
There are laws in place that say you cannot pirate. Team Xecuter didn't get in trouble for bypassing the security of the switch, but because they advertised themselves and sold devices with the intent of piracy, if they had marketed it as just a modding device, and didn't include the patches, then they would've been just fine. Modding is legal, piracy is not.

Are you that disconnected from reality that the concept of the legal system defending the property of a company (Multiple companies in this case by the way, as they proudly boasted pirating games, that directly correlates to a loss of income from other developers which would also be interested in defending their income) is so hard to understand? Companies are protected by laws, unless you have an argument as to why that's not the case.

I only briefly touched on it in the article, but a significant portion of the defense's argument was just a list of bad things that happened to Gary. Basically his dad traveled a lot so he moved between the U.S. and Canada a lot so he was always moving and did most of his schooling through correspondence courses, so he was a loner and didn't make any friends, his brother died in a plane crash, his mom died when he was young, he became dependent on alcohol at 15, he had no family left when his dad died, he contracted elephantiasis, one girlfriend was murdered, and another was abusive towards him to the point that he was put in the hospital three times. They also say that Gary was the only member of Team Xecuter not involved in Louarn's social life, that they all lived lavish and extravagant lives that he was excluded from, he lived modestly after losing his nest egg, several people described him as wanting to be liked and easily taken advantage of. That's all really sad, but I don't know why they brought it up. I guess the idea is that he's a victim of Louarn's and was manipulated into doing this and should be given a lighter sentence accordingly, but it's not really made explicit. But I'm not a lawyer, so maybe I'm missing the point.
The defense knew he was fucked from the start, and nothing they could've done would've changed the outcome. At that point lawyers try to do everything they can to instead reduce the sentence as much as possible.
 

MasterJ360

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
2,801
Trophies
1
Age
35
XP
3,453
Country
United States
I own a sx dongle and I bought Pokemon Legends. This is more than the modchip
Thank you. I own 2 hacked Switch's one of them being sxos and yet I bought a 3rd Switch (OLED) and the recent games I purchased are Pkmn Pearl, SMTV, and Pkmn Legends. I pirate alot, but Nintendo is still getting my damn money somehow lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanIHazWarez

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
31,284
Trophies
2
Age
38
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,969
Country
United States
Five years for piracy? Aww, poor Nintendo must be absolutely devastated and absolutely hurting financially :rolleyes:



Gonna keep playing ROMs and emulators in ways they never intended, as well as flashcarts on hardware clones. NOA can kiss my ass :creep:
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    OctoAori20 @ OctoAori20: Nice nice-