Objectively speaking, the gerbers from OpenMig are actually pretty good. Below is a side-by-side comparison of all 4 layers of the PCB I reverse-engineered on the left and OpenMig's PCB on the right.
The two are very similar, and this was definitely created as a board that they intended on being a proper clone. However, the bottom layer doesn't have pins 1 and 2 separated, so this design will not work with the button as I previously pointed out in
post #1698.
Apart from that though, I don't see anything wrong, and I think their board would work either as a V1 clone or a V2 clone if someone cut the two pins like in the
V1 to V2 conversion guide that MIG linked to.
As for OpenMIG being an arm of UnlockSwitch, why did UnlockSwitch make their own clone flashcart and then also the OpenMIG one? I know you are a bit of an insider with them, so how do you know that the two are the same team?
View attachment 486432
View attachment 486433
View attachment 486434
View attachment 486435
This is 100% it. RE'ing the hardware is challenging, but doable. The software, however, likely requires low-level exploits or physically decapping the chip to extract the binaries on it, all of which is much more involved. They cloned the hardware and transplanted the chips, thought that they only had a few weeks/months of work left to clone the software, and then the project ended there.