Are you referring to the inventor or the company?All of you who say bad things about Tesla are idiots. All of you.
Because Nikola Tesla was cool as fuck. If I ever get a time machine I'm definitely going to go hang out with him.
Are you referring to the inventor or the company?All of you who say bad things about Tesla are idiots. All of you.
Are you referring to the inventor or the company?
Because Nikola Tesla was cool as fuck. If I ever get a time machine I'm definitely going to go hang out with him.
you better take some precautions than he is a vampire afterallAre you referring to the inventor or the company?
Because Nikola Tesla was cool as fuck. If I ever get a time machine I'm definitely going to go hang out with him.
you better take some precautions than he is a vampire afterall
Both.
You damn right he was cool as fuck.
Oh no you just didn't go there.Tesla was an eccentric kook. Edison was better.
If people are worried about the environment that much it is easy enough to convert most older cars to run off Hydrogen or use Bio-Diesel anyway.
I much rather put my money into that than a company, on top of the fact you can learn a thing or two from the effort put forth.
Actually it's been happening for about a hundred years. It was just the deal in the States (among others IIRC) that oil is just easier to make a huge profit. Basically the oil industry pumped the senate with funds to make it more profitable to develop oil based transports. If we'd have kept developing EVs from the start of the 20th century, we'd have quite efficient engines and combustion would at tops be powering the generator for creating the electricity for the engine compared to the combustion engines used for creating the movement.
Oh no you just didn't go there.
Edison was a corporate asshole motherfucker who knew how to bribe the White House even then.
Tesla wanted free energy for everybody. And he was far from eccentric. Unlike Edison who was fed with a silver spoon, Tesla worked in construction on minimum wage while being a genius.
Take that.
you better take some precautions than he is a vampire afterall
Tesla was an eccentric kook. Edison was better.
no it was Helen MagnusHe only had one love, and her name was Science.
.
if it is about being cost effective to use with that phrase with Tesla as an example is a bit laughable.Seriously? Electric cars cost almost nothing to run compared to regular cars. It shouldn't really be an environmental question, but a cost effective question.
yeah and what happens when all the fuel runs out huh? the wells are all drying upClearly the future of transportation lies in something viable like fuel cells. We'll all look back at solar panels, wind mills, and electric cars years from now and say that was a big mistake and misallocation of resources
Yeah a fuel cell uses electricity but you don't need 2000 pounds of batteries to make it goFor the record fuel cell =/= fossil fuel powered device. Now they have certainly been fuel for fuel cells made from fossil fuels in the same way plastics are often still made from oil but that is a different discussion and not really that relevant.
Also fuel cells tend to kick out electricity as their primary energy output so you are still making an electric car.
Or did I miss a joke?