Hacking SNEEK v2

[gaungagung]

there are now precompiled versions of the armboot and the ES/FS modules(with DI disabled) on the SNEEK site.

still a lot of bug's in the uncompiled versions, I always failed to compile it, btw there is a well understood and compile correctly in version 57, thank you

 

[GolfDude]

what do we do with the es and fs modules from teh site?

 

[betita_elfica]

this are the steps for compiling (for me) but at the moment black screen, i recompilate it now and tonight try.

1- Download to new folder the svn
2- go to my IOS70 downloaded from NUS 0000000100000046v6687/ and copy 000000e.app and 0000001.app to the sneeksvnfolder.
3- rename the decrypted files to 000000e.app -> 000000e and 0000001.app -> 0000001.
4- Do the make in the mini-tree-mod to make the armboot.bin (i have added C:\python26 to the system PATH for no changing the MAKEBIN on makefile everytime)
5- then run build_boot2_di.cmd and makes boot2_sd.bin, boot2_usb.bin and di.bin.
6- copy armboot.bin to sd/bootmii/
7- copy boot2_sd.bin to sd/ and rename to boot2.bin
8-copy di.bin to sd/


I have the 8 folders of my nand on the sd/


Anyone does something different?thnks

 

[longtom1]

If you only want to use the sd card and not use usb you just need to run the build_boot2.bat

you should only need armboot.bin and boot2.bin as the latest rev says you don't need the ppcboot.elf and bootmii.ini

 

[betita_elfica]

Ok its right compiled tonight i try it, yes i dont need di.bin but if i run buid_boo2_di.cmd the only change its the make to di/ and the elfins\elfins fs-usb\iosmodule.elf 00000001 di.bin -d. Its the same no copying di.bin and compiling with build_boot2_di.cmd = compiling build_boot2.cmd

 

[longtom1]

there's something wrong here compared the my compiled versions and the R59 from googlecode page and there's a size difference of about 1kb in both .elf files the ones from the googlecode page will boot of sd card but there's no sd access for homebrew channel

 

[betita_elfica]

mm i see 1kb more.. why? it says r59 but its not really the same i think. Have you tried my compiles?

 

[longtom1]

I don't know why the file sizes are different

tried both batch files and still get no signal

got the elf modules form googlecode and compiled them and they work the wii will boot to emulated nand

 

[betita_elfica]

my compiles dont work and using the es/fs from googlecode works? i try in 10 mintus.

For use the 2 elfs that are in sneek googlecode i put one in es/ and other in fs/, but the build_boot2.cmd goes also to fs-usb :S

elfins\elfins fs\iosmodule.elf 0000000E 0000000E-tmp -s
elfins\elfins es\esmodule.elf 0000000E-tmp boot2_sd.bin
elfins\elfins fs-usb\iosmodule.elf 0000000E 0000000E-tmp -u
elfins\elfins es\esmodule.elf 0000000E-tmp boot2_usb.bin

i need to delete 3rd line?

 

[longtom1]

no just make a folder and put the R59 elf files in there and add the 0000000e.app and elfins.exe from the elfins folder and run this in a batch

elfins.exe fsmodule_r59.elf 0000000E.app 0000000E-tmp -s
elfins.exe esmodule_r59.elf 0000000E-tmp boot2R59.bin
del 0000000E-tmp

and it'll create the boot2_R59.bin and you just rename it boot2.bin and use the armboot.bin from the googlecode downloads and not sure if you need ppcboot.elf or bootmii.ini

 

[Krestent]

Which version is confirmed working with DI?

 

[longtom1]

R45 was the last version that I had working with the DI

 

[Krestent]

I used to be able to checkout SVN fine, now it's giving me a 502 Bad Gateway error

 

[Det1re]

and it'll create the boot2_R59.bin and you just rename it boot2.bin and use the armboot.bin from the googlecode downloads and not sure if you need ppcboot.elf or bootmii.ini
Not needed anymore.

QUOTE(tattar8 @ Mar 19 2010, 08:59 PM) Which version is confirmed working with DI?

Latest should also have the DI working but NOT if you use it as UNEEK.

 

[longtom1]

and it'll create the boot2_R59.bin and you just rename it boot2.bin and use the armboot.bin from the googlecode downloads and not sure if you need ppcboot.elf or bootmii.ini
Not needed anymore.

QUOTE(tattar8 @ Mar 19 2010, 08:59 PM) Which version is confirmed working with DI?

Latest should also have the DI working but NOT if you use it as UNEEK.

have tried compiling multiple times and the elf files output are different to the ones on the googlecode download page there's about a 1kb difference

the ones form the googlecode page work a treat but the compiled ones just give a no signal

@tattar8 same for me just get 504 bad gateway also

 

[betita_elfica]

I think i buy a usb gecko.

 

[betita_elfica]

no just make a folder and put the R59 elf files in there and add the 0000000e.app and elfins.exe from the elfins folder and run this in a batch

elfins.exe fsmodule_r59.elf 0000000E.app 0000000E-tmp -s
elfins.exe esmodule_r59.elf 0000000E-tmp boot2R59.bin
del 0000000E-tmp

and it'll create the boot2_R59.bin and you just rename it boot2.bin and use the armboot.bin from the googlecode downloads and not sure if you need ppcboot.elf or bootmii.ini

ASOMEWONE IT WORKS on my white newest wii

i have only one question why if i do the compile i get es and fs module with 1kb less than the files in google code?

 

[longtom1]

no just make a folder and put the R59 elf files in there and add the 0000000e.app and elfins.exe from the elfins folder and run this in a batch

elfins.exe fsmodule_r59.elf 0000000E.app 0000000E-tmp -s
elfins.exe esmodule_r59.elf 0000000E-tmp boot2R59.bin
del 0000000E-tmp

and it'll create the boot2_R59.bin and you just rename it boot2.bin and use the armboot.bin from the googlecode downloads and not sure if you need ppcboot.elf or bootmii.ini

ASOMEWONE IT WORKS on my white newest wii

i have only one question why if i do the compile i get es and fs module with 1kb less than the files in google code?

nobody knows I think

 

[fogbank]

I got my compiled r59 (no di yet) working by using boot2me.exe the way it used to be required.

I also used the older armboot.bin (before r47) along with ppcboot.elf and bootmii.ini.

- Compile es and fs from r59 source.
- Elfins the modules the old way (fs + e.app --> tmp1 es + tmp1 --> tmp2)
- Boot2me tmp2 --> boot2.bin

I'm not sure why it worked, but without using boot2me I got a black screen. Also with using the new armboot.bin I got no signal.

Same thing above applied to the precompiled esfs_r59 and armboot_r47 for me.

 

[redeyed]

Can someone try the following.

Open devkitpro folder
Rename devkitARM to devkitARM_orig (my original was r28)
Google Search and download "devkitARM_r24win32.exe"
Extract to devkitpro folder creating a new devkitARM
Now try and compile sneek r59

worked for me