[RUMOR] CoD: Black Ops 2 in development

[Guild McCommunist]

I dislike what CoD has become, and I liked the first 4 games but the online is ruined by the community. CoD has such a terrible community backing it that I can't be bothered to play online

>Mute voice chat
>Problem solved

The community is shit but there's no reason why you can't just mute them. I never listen to my teammates in any game online unless they're my friends. Also, I'm not quite sure if I'd want a user base of obnoxious 12 year olds who through around the word "faggot" like the word "the" or a user base of super elitist gamers who basically make getting into any game physically impossible.

 

[Satangel]

I dislike what CoD has become, and I liked the first 4 games but the online is ruined by the community. CoD has such a terrible community backing it that I can't be bothered to play online

Go play MW2 on the PC, via AlterIWNet (Google). They got AlterOps now too btw. The community is tons better on PC, and via that version of MW2 there are mods that disable boosting, grenade launchers, OMA, Danger Close, launchers, ...... Trust me, it's a completely new experience, free.

 

[Deleted User]

The second effort is put into the game, Ill play it.

 

[BORTZ]

Personally I think CoD games are terrible.
BUT
Even most of my CoD adoring friends said that Black Ops wasn't that great. They like WaW and stuff better.
Whatever, I won't be buying/playing this. If I have to play a generic shooter, I'll stick to BF3.

 

[gifi4]

I used to be a CoD fan, period.

Edit: But in all seriousness, I played CoD4 the longest, MW2 for a shorter time, Black ops for a shorter time and MW3 for just over a day of online. If I were to buy the next CoD, it wouldn't last me more than 12 hours before I let it collect dust.

 

[Erdnaxela]

COD is for casual gamerz! (j/k)
Never liked pure FPS, FPS-RPG like borderland is way better.

 

[4-leaf-clover]

Meh i actually like COD but.... It gets repetitive (the same with almost all FPS games)
But sometimes i'm thinking what CAN you change about a game like cod... or just FPS games.
You can't really change much about a game like cod... (except for graphics, killstreaks,weapons Etc.) buuuut that's just my opinion.

 

[Deleted User]

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

 

[Gahars]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The brand new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with memorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a host of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

 

[The Milkman]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The brand new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with memorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a host of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

All of that shit could have just been DLC. They didnt need to make another game for it.

 

[Gahars]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The brand new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with memorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a host of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

All of that shit could have just been DLC. They didnt need to make another game for it.

Spoiler

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/545/OpoQQ.jpg

When any major developer ever releases a full fledged sequel to their one of their games (with all of the features I listed above) as DLC only, let me know.

 

[Hells Malice]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The bland new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with unmemorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a handful of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

I left New game modes alone, but really they haven't done much for that either.
it's the same shit, i'm sorry if you don't notice that.

Graphic update, and roster perk shuffle update is all they really do.

 

[zachtheninja]

I never played Black Ops, so this might be nice...

 

[Deleted User]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The bland new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with unmemorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a handful of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

I left New game modes alone, but really they haven't done much for that either.
it's the same shit, i'm sorry if you don't notice that.

Graphic update, and roster perk shuffle update is all they really do.

It's not even a graphic update, they just change the color scheme around.

 

[Deleted-236924]

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

If you disliked Pokémon Red/Blue, would you dislike Black/White as well?

Spoiler

I used to be a CoD fan

Then you took a bullet to the knee

 

[The Milkman]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The brand new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with memorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a host of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

All of that shit could have just been DLC. They didnt need to make another game for it.

Spoiler

http://i0.kym-cdn.co...5/545/OpoQQ.jpg

When any major developer ever releases a full fledged sequel to their one of their games (with all of the features I listed above) as DLC only, let me know.

Its not a sequel if it can be DLC dumbass.

 

[Deleted User]

The difference between Pokemon Red/Blue and Black/White is like comparing humans that first walked the earth, to humans that travel in space

 

[Gahars]

Revamped

So you don't need to play games anymore to judge them? Huh, I must have missed that development.

There's nothing wrong with disliking a game, but you should play it first instead of dismissing it because, hey, that's the cool thing to do now.

When the game has been the same for the past 5 years, you can judge it without buying it.

Except that really isn't the case, so yeah, this seems like a perfect demonstration of my point.

Except that it always is the same fucking case, whats different between cod games, different weapons, a new gamemode, and some titles.

Call of Duty is madden of shooters.

The brand new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with memorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a host of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

All of that shit could have just been DLC. They didnt need to make another game for it.

Spoiler

http://i0.kym-cdn.co...5/545/OpoQQ.jpg

When any major developer ever releases a full fledged sequel to their one of their games (with all of the features I listed above) as DLC only, let me know.

Its not a sequel if it can be DLC dumbass.

It's almost as if I was saying that they had too much content to be dlc. Fancy that!

The bland new campaigns (Treyarch much more so than IW, but still), filled with unmemorable set pieces, revamped multiplayer, new game modes, and a handful of other adjustments between each new game are pretty hard to miss. Unless, of course, you haven't actually played the games.

Then again, it is pretty easy to lose sight of the facts when you're too busy jumping on a bandwagon.

I left New game modes alone, but really they haven't done much for that either.
it's the same shit, i'm sorry if you don't notice that.

Graphic update, and roster perk shuffle update is all they really do.

If you can't play two of them (How about, say, Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3) and not immediately see the large amount of differences between the two, the problem doesn't lie with the games themselves.

Also, really with the text editing? If you're going to argue through that, fine, but at least put some thought and effort into it.

 

[Hells Malice]

I didn't text edit, i text corrected.
Though hell i coulda just nuked your post and it woulda been just as valid either way.

 

[The Milkman]

Sniped fanboism

I love how you use sarcasm and meme pics to insult me.

What have they REALLY changed other then some stages and gamemodes? TF2 has added new maps and gamemodes and they didn't need more then one game for that. So tell me what truely makes the games different. Its one thing to like a game for all its faults its another thing to come and insult others because they don't.