Napalm had been fully decommissioned by the U.S. Army, the last canister was destroyed in 2001. The use of Agent Orange stopped in the 1970’s. Not sure what you mean by “dirty bombs”, the U.S. never used dirty nukes if that’s what you meant, they can afford real ones. Do you mean depleted uranium shells? Those are not used because they’re radioactive, they’re used for armor penetration.
My browser derped and slashed the post in half. I’ve updated it now. In any case, your concerns seem decades out of date, you’ll have to be more specific.
I don't see what relevance "The army doesn't use this" has to "Deregulation of munitions." Maybe you can elaborate.
When it's littearrly the person right next to them saying that. That's not hearsay. If she heard it from someone else, who heard it. Then it would be. And she does meet the adquate part of that definition to pass, as she was right next to him time and time again. Primarily because it's part of her job
White phosphorus and napalm are not the same, their chemical composition and function are different. Napalm is a mixture of a volatile (petrol or diesel fuel) and a gelling agent, it was deployed by plane to indiscriminately clear out large swathes of land. White phosphorous munitions are, well, white phosphorus. While they *can* be deployed somewhat like napalm, more modern munitions were specifically designed for tactical uses like bunker or tank busting. They’d penetrate otherwise impenetrable armor plating/obstacles and burn the crew. As far as munitions regulation is concerned, I think we both agree that it’s necessary - that sadly means that not everyone will play fair and honourable, but I’d rather be the “good guy” in any conflict, a sentiment not always shared by fellow gun enthusiasts. I simply figured that I’d mention that those weapons aren’t in use, and haven’t been in use for a very long time.
Well, the whole point is that it’s highly flammable and sticky, so yeah, I can see that. Apparently styrene (the base polymer used for styrofoam) polymerises when combined with benzene, resulting in a highly flammable, sticky mess.
Oh, I’m well-aware of the recipe - I’m from the old Internet.
I'm from the Amiga BBS days, back in the dial up days I had a 16 kbps modem and was the envy of many! How times have changed :-). Remember when AOL was a thing - In UK we had currant bun internet in the late 90's, back then it was awesome as it only took about 3 days to download a CD ISO.
Can’t help but think that things were better back then, I miss the old web. In any case, Roe v. Wade, yes? We strayed quite a bit from the topic of the conversation.
They are against people murdering other peoples bodies - the unborn child isn't some inconvenience that needs killed, it's a sentient being that doesn't deserve to be snuffed out before it's even taken it's first breath.
Your comment didn’t answer my question. Why do pro-lifers constantly deflect questions? I have to ask, how do you or anyone else plan on stopping abortions? I’ve said this countless times before, history and current events show that abortions are going to continue to happen, they will just move to dirty motels. So what’s your plan to stop that? Roe v Wade at least moved abortions to cleans and professional settings, which drastically dropped the rate of people dying from abortions or dying from complications that lead up to an abortion. Abortions are still going to happen, so what’s the plan?
You won't be able to stop someone that's intent on going to a dirty motel because people have free will. They will however face the might of the law afterwards if they are found out so if they want to take that chance it's up to them and they have to live with that.
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@
Xdqwerty:
@
Psionic Roshambo:
