Also, it's say that if the game has a file over 4 gigs, it can't
rip it. So if somebody rips it onto an internal drive and puts it online, you can download it and put it on your external from your computer.
Not true. The problem is that te FAT filesystem doesn't allow for single files over 4gb (filesize is a 32 bit unsigned int). Thus, you can't store any file larger than 4 gigs. If they get NTFS working (or even better EXT3) then you should be able to store any game.The thing is if it's NTFS read or write support. Read support of a filesystem is much easier than write, and for obvious reasons you never want to release buggy write support, so that may be what's waiting (as they specifically just say "rip", and as I showed read support of NTFS has been stable in the open-source community for a little over ten years now).
Anyways as somebody may have stated, the 4 gig limit is just what microsoft imposes for FAT32 because it's derived from their limited sector/cluster size (can't remember which right now), if you raise the sector/cluster size you can get a larger limit... though this will mean that the "size on disc" for each file under the minimum sector size will increase, so if PS3 games are composed of a -ton- (like hundreds) of small files instead, that may not be a viable solution (which they may or may not have tested). Even if they did test and it works for PS3 games, formatting a partition specifically that way is something they might not feel users want to deal with.
Maz7006 said:
Does anyone know anything about this PS Jailbreak Team and.or who they are affialted or does like and popular DEV know who they are. Im sure they are just using this name as an alias, jsut in case things clean if it gets dirty and they dnt wanna harm their real team name.So the concept of "a new team" doesn't make any sense to you?
There's always groups of people willing to hack at stuff, just check out
http://lifehacker.com/ for plenty of examples. Most people that can hack/code stuff are not part of a team, you know.
QUOTE(dnniwa485 @ Aug 21 2010, 06:59 AM) well.. they manage to disable other OS right? this should be a piece of cake for them... ;D
Except OtherOS was simply a feature in the default firmware and was never a technical requirement.
QUOTE(PagaN @ Aug 21 2010, 07:36 AM)